Usage Score
7.5
Player Dossier
2019-2024Arizona State
DeCarlos Brooks
RB • 5'11" • 210 lbs • Chandler, AZ, USA
Balanced backfield optionSteady chain mover
DeCarlos Brooks leans balanced backfield option traits and 43.5 efficiency.
Efficiency
43.5
Consistency
46.8
Season Value
37.1
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by Season Value: 2023 Regular Season · Arizona State
192021222324
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 2
- Seasons Tracked
- 6
- Program Path
- California • Arizona State
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Nevada
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
DeCarlos Brooks, RB. Best season Best season by Season Value: 2023 Regular Season · Arizona State. DeCarlos Brooks leans balanced backfield option traits and 43.5 efficiency.
DeCarlos Brooks played RB for California and Arizona State. Across 6 tracked seasons, DeCarlos Brooks recorded 753 rushing yards, 79 receiving yards, and 5 tackles. His top tracked season came in 2023 with Arizona State.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2023 Regular Season
Arizona State paired 306 primary output with 57.4 efficiency.
Supporting note
2024 Regular Season role shape
backfield-heavy usage with 43.5 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value cooled off
2024 Regular Season fell back from the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Multi-stop career journey
Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across California, Arizona State.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Wyoming
Win with 47 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2024 Regular Season · Arizona State
Games
9
Scrimmage Yards / G
17.2
Efficiency
43.5
Usage
7.5
Consistency
46.8
Best Game by takeover score
Wyoming
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Game-by-Game Trend
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Wyoming: 47. Mississippi State: 24. Kansas: 8. Utah: 22. Cincinnati: 22. Oklahoma State: 5. UCF: 4. Arizona: 11. Iowa State: 12
Volume vs Efficiency
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Wyoming: 6 by 81.6. Mississippi State: 8 by 31.3. Kansas: 1 by 83.3. Utah: 4 by 54.2. Cincinnati: 6 by 38.2. Oklahoma State: 2 by 26. UCF: 3 by 13.9. Arizona: 3 by 38.2. Iowa State: 5 by 25
Split Comparison
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Wins16.6 · Games = 8 · -5.4 vs Losses
Losses22 · Games = 1 · +5.4 vs Wins
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
9 games
Featured metric
Scrimmage Yards
Top game by takeover score
Wyoming
Best efficiency game
83.3 vs Kansas
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 12/7 | vs Iowa State | W 45-19 | 5 | 12 | 2.40 | 0 | — | — | 2.4 |
| Sat 11/30 | @ Arizona | W 49-7 | 3 | 11 | 3.70 | 0 | — | — | 3.7 |
| Sun 11/10 | vs UCF | W 35-31 | 3 | 4 | 1.30 | 0 | — | — | 1.3 |
| Sat 11/2 | @ Oklahoma State | W 42-21 | 2 | 5 | 2.50 | 0 | — | — | 2.5 |
| Sat 10/19 | @ Cincinnati | L 14-24 | 6 | 22 | 3.70 | 0 | — | — | 3.7 |
| Sat 10/12 | vs Utah | W 27-19 | 3 | 15 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 7 | 5.5 |
| Sun 10/6 | vs Kansas | W 35-31 | 1 | 8 | 8 | 0 | — | — | 8 |
| Sun 9/8 | vs Mississippi State | W 30-23 | 8 | 24 | 3 | 0 | — | — | 3 |
| Sun 9/1 | vs Wyoming | W 48-7 | 6 | 47 | 7.80 | 1 | — | — | 7.8 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
California
2019-2022
Opening stop
- 2
Arizona State
2023-2024
Final stop
Season Value Progression
201920202021202220232024
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 Regular Season | California | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2020 Regular Season | California | 0 | — | — | 0 |
| 2021 Regular Season | California | 103 | 59.2 | 4.5 | 103 |
| 2022 Regular Season | California | 268 | 46.2 | 10.5 | 165 |
| 2023 Regular Season | Arizona State | 306 | 57.4 | 20.4 | 38 |
| 2024 Regular Season | Arizona State | 155 | 43.5 | 7.5 | -151 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Nevada
Loss with 46 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
46
Primary metric
46 scrimmage yards and 3.8 usage.
#2
Notre Dame
43
Primary metric
Loss with 43 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
43 scrimmage yards and 10.6 usage.
#3
Wyoming
47
Primary metric
Win with 47 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
47 scrimmage yards and 9.5 usage.
#4
Washington State
79
Primary metric
Win with 79 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
79 scrimmage yards and 22.4 usage.
#5
Sacramento State
39
Primary metric
Win with 39 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
39 scrimmage yards and 9.1 usage.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by Season Value
2023 Regular Season · Arizona State
306 primary output · 57.4 efficiency · 20.4 usage
65.5
#2
2022 Regular Season · California
51.6
268 primary · 46.2 efficiency · 10.5 usage
#3
2024 Regular Season · Arizona State
37.1
155 primary · 43.5 efficiency · 7.5 usage
Milestones
0
100+ rush yards
0
150+ scrimmage yards
1
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Career Facts
2
Career teams
6
Seasons tracked
832
Career Scrimmage Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 6 tracked seasons, 31 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Next best actions
Keep exploring DeCarlos Brooks
Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.