Usage Score
25.4
Player Dossier
2019-2022Fresno State
WR • 6'0" • 180 lbs • Parlier, CA, USA
Jalen Moreno-Cropper reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Usage Score
25.4
Efficiency
76.7
Consistency
61.1
Season Value
65.8
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by Season Value: 2022 Postseason · Fresno State
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Jalen Moreno-Cropper, WR. Best season Best season by Season Value: 2022 Postseason · Fresno State. Jalen Moreno-Cropper reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Jalen Moreno-Cropper played WR for Fresno State. Across 4 tracked seasons, Jalen Moreno-Cropper recorded 87 passing yards, 468 rushing yards, and 2,615 receiving yards. His top tracked season came in 2022 with Fresno State.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2022 Postseason
Fresno State paired 1,000 primary output with 76.7 efficiency.
Supporting note
2022 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 76.7 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2022 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: New Mexico
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 92.3th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
13
Receiving Yards / G
76.9
Efficiency
76.7
Usage
25.4
Consistency
61.1
Best Game by takeover score
New Mexico
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Washington State: 42. Cal Poly: 63. USC: 62. UConn: 76. Boise State: 23. San José State: 36. New Mexico: 158. San Diego State: 67. Hawai'i: 93. UNLV: 164. Nevada: 136. Wyoming: 20. Boise State: 60
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Washington State: 4 by 70. Cal Poly: 7 by 60. USC: 8 by 51.7. UConn: 5 by 100. Boise State: 2 by 76.7. San José State: 6 by 40. New Mexico: 9 by 100. San Diego State: 6 by 74.4. Hawai'i: 5 by 100. UNLV: 8 by 100. Nevada: 7 by 100. Wyoming: 3 by 44.4. Boise State: 5 by 80
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
13 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
New Mexico
Best efficiency game
100 vs Nevada
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 12/17 | vs Washington State | W 29-6 | — | 4 | 42 | 10.5 | 10.50 | 0 | 13 |
| Sat 12/3 | @ Boise State | W 28-16 | — | 5 | 60 | 12 | 12 | 0 | 20 |
| Sat 11/26 | vs Wyoming | W 30-0 | — | 3 | 20 | 6.7 | 6.70 | 0 | 9 |
| Sun 11/20 | @ Nevada100 receiving yards | W 41-14 | — | 7 | 136 | 17.3 | 19.40 | 0 | 45 |
| Sat 11/12 | @ UNLV100 receiving yards · High volume | W 37-30 | — | 8 | 164 | 20.5 | 20.50 | 2 | 65 |
| Sun 11/6 | vs Hawai'i2+ TD | W 55-13 | — | 5 | 93 | 18.6 | 18.60 | 2 | 59 |
| Sun 10/30 | vs San Diego State | W 32-28 | — | 6 | 67 | 11.2 | 11.20 | 0 | 29 |
| Sat 10/22 | @ New Mexico100 receiving yards · High volume | W 41-9 | — | 9 | 158 | 17.6 | 17.60 | 1 | 75 |
| Sun 10/16 | vs San José State | W 17-10 | — | 6 | 36 | 5.7 | 6 | 0 | 17 |
| Sun 10/9 | @ Boise State | L 20-40 | — | 2 | 23 | 11.5 | 11.50 | 0 | 16 |
| Sat 10/1 | @ UConn | L 14-19 | — | 5 | 76 | 10.6 | 15.20 | 0 | 32 |
| Sun 9/18 | @ USCHigh volume | L 17-45 | — | 8 | 62 | 8 | 7.80 | 0 | 14 |
| Fri 9/2 | vs Cal Poly | W 35-7 | — | 7 | 63 | 9 | 9 | 0 | 28 |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Fresno State
2019-2022
Opening stop
Season Value Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 Regular Season | Fresno State | 196 | 58.8 | 11.1 | — |
| 2020 Regular Season | Fresno State | 520 | 76.9 | 22.8 | 324 |
| 2021 Postseason | Fresno State | 899 | 70.2 | 24.2 | 379 |
| 2021 Regular Season | Fresno State | 899 | 70.2 | 24.2 | 0 |
| 2022 Postseason | Fresno State | 1,000 | 76.7 | 25.4 | 101 |
| 2022 Regular Season | Fresno State | 1,000 | 76.7 | 25.4 | 0 |
#1 Featured game
New Mexico
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
158
Primary metric
158 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Utah State
202
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
202 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
UNLV
164
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
164 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
Utah State
87
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
87 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
Nevada
136
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
136 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#1 Season by Season Value
2022 Postseason · Fresno State
1,000 primary output · 76.7 efficiency · 25.4 usage
65.8
#2
2022 Regular Season · Fresno State
65.8
1,000 primary · 76.7 efficiency · 25.4 usage
#3
2021 Postseason · Fresno State
64.1
899 primary · 70.2 efficiency · 24.2 usage
8
100+ receiving yards
8
8+ catch outings
4
2+ TD games
Career Facts
1
Career teams
6
Seasons tracked
2,615
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 6 tracked seasons, 41 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Next best actions
Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.