Usage Score
14.8
Player Dossier
2019-2023Buffalo
Boobie Curry
WR • 6'2" • 205 lbs • Houston, TX, USA
Reliable chain-moverPossession profile
Boobie Curry reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
66.4
Consistency
42.9
Season Value
56
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by Season Value: 2021 Regular Season · Arizona
1920212223
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 2
- Seasons Tracked
- 5
- Program Path
- Arizona • Buffalo
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Central Michigan
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Boobie Curry, WR. Best season Best season by Season Value: 2021 Regular Season · Arizona. Boobie Curry reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Boobie Curry played WR for Arizona and Buffalo. Across 5 tracked seasons, Boobie Curry recorded 761 receiving yards, 2 tackles, and 4 touchdowns. His top tracked season came in 2023 with Buffalo.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2021 Regular Season
Arizona paired 233 primary output with 71 efficiency.
Supporting note
2023 Regular Season role shape
target-driven usage with 66.4 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value is trending up
2023 Regular Season improved on the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Multi-stop career journey
Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across Arizona, Buffalo.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Central Michigan
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2023 Regular Season · Buffalo
Games
11
Receiving Yards / G
27.5
Efficiency
66.4
Usage
14.8
Consistency
42.9
Best Game by takeover score
Central Michigan
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Game-by-Game Trend
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Wisconsin: 0. Fordham: 23. Liberty: 30. Louisiana: 16. Akron: 13. Central Michigan: 74. Kent State: 17. Toledo: 31. Ohio: 66. Miami (OH): 16. Eastern Michigan: 17
Volume vs Efficiency
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Wisconsin: 3 by 0. Fordham: 4 by 38.3. Liberty: 3 by 66.7. Louisiana: 1 by 100. Akron: 2 by 43.3. Central Michigan: 4 by 100. Kent State: 2 by 56.7. Toledo: 3 by 68.9. Ohio: 4 by 100. Miami (OH): 1 by 100. Eastern Michigan: 2 by 56.7
Split Comparison
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Wins34.7 · Games = 3 · +9.8 vs Losses
Losses24.9 · Games = 8 · -9.8 vs Wins
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
11 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Central Michigan
Best efficiency game
100 vs Miami (OH)
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wed 11/22 | vs Eastern Michigan | L 11-24 | — | 2 | 17 | 8.5 | 8.50 | 0 | 12 |
| Thu 11/16 | @ Miami (OH) | L 10-23 | — | 1 | 16 | 16 | 16 | 0 | 16 |
| Wed 11/8 | vs Ohio | L 10-20 | — | 4 | 66 | 16.5 | 16.50 | 0 | 48 |
| Tue 10/31 | @ Toledo | L 13-31 | — | 3 | 31 | 10.3 | 10.30 | 0 | 15 |
| Sat 10/21 | @ Kent State | W 24-6 | — | 2 | 17 | 8.5 | 8.50 | 0 | 9 |
| Sat 10/7 | vs Central Michigan | W 37-13 | — | 4 | 74 | 18.5 | 18.50 | 0 | 29 |
| Sat 9/30 | @ Akron | W 13-10 | — | 2 | 13 | 6.5 | 6.50 | 1 | 9 |
| Sat 9/23 | @ Louisiana | L 38-45 | — | 1 | 16 | 16 | 16 | 0 | 16 |
| Sat 9/16 | vs Liberty | L 27-55 | — | 3 | 30 | 10 | 10 | 0 | 18 |
| Sat 9/9 | vs Fordham | L 37-40 | — | 4 | 23 | 5.8 | 5.80 | 0 | 9 |
| Sat 9/2 | @ Wisconsin | L 17-38 | — | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Arizona
2019-2021
Opening stop
- 2
Buffalo
2022-2023
Final stop
Season Value Progression
20192020202120222023
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 Regular Season | Arizona | 68 | 66.7 | 5.4 | — |
| 2020 Regular Season | Arizona | 84 | 50.4 | 10.2 | 16 |
| 2021 Regular Season | Arizona | 233 | 71 | 14.5 | 149 |
| 2022 Regular Season | Buffalo | 73 | 74.2 | 8 | -160 |
| 2023 Regular Season | Buffalo | 303 | 66.4 | 14.8 | 230 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Central Michigan
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
74
Primary metric
74 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Ohio
66
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
66 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Northern Arizona
55
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
55 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
Utah
20
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
20 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
Washington
55
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
55 receiving yards with a 91.7 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by Season Value
2021 Regular Season · Arizona
233 primary output · 71 efficiency · 14.5 usage
59.3
#2
2023 Regular Season · Buffalo
56
303 primary · 66.4 efficiency · 14.8 usage
#3
2022 Regular Season · Buffalo
46.1
73 primary · 74.2 efficiency · 8 usage
Milestones
0
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
1
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Career Facts
2
Career teams
5
Seasons tracked
761
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 5 tracked seasons, 31 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Next best actions
Keep exploring Boobie Curry
Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.