Player Dossier

2019-2023

Tulsa

Ben Kopenski

DL • 6'1" • 255 lbs • Mckinney, TX, USA

Ball-hunting defenderSplash play profile

Ben Kopenski shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 41.1 disruption score.

Usage Score

13.4

Efficiency

41.1

Consistency

46.5

Season Value

50.2

Career Arc

Value trend by season

Best season by Season Value: 2023 Regular Season · Tulsa

1920212223

Snapshot

Career Teams
2
Seasons Tracked
5
Program Path
Oklahoma State • Tulsa
Peak Game
Peak game by takeover score: North Texas

Scouting Read

Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.

Ben Kopenski, DL. Best season Best season by Season Value: 2023 Regular Season · Tulsa. Ben Kopenski shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 41.1 disruption score.

Ben Kopenski played DL for Oklahoma State and Tulsa. Across 5 tracked seasons, Ben Kopenski recorded -6 rushing yards and 66 tackles. His top tracked season came in 2023 with Tulsa.

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2023 Regular Season

Tulsa paired 26 primary output with 41.1 efficiency.

Supporting note

2023 Regular Season role shape

impact-led usage with 41.1 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value is trending up

2023 Regular Season improved on the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Multi-stop career journey

Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across Oklahoma State, Tulsa.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: North Texas

Loss with backfield disruption leading the way. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2023 Regular Season · Tulsa

Games

11

Havoc Plays / G

2.4

Efficiency

41.1

Usage

13.4

Consistency

46.5

Best Game by takeover score

North Texas

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

1234567891011

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Arkansas-Pine Bluff: 5.5. Oklahoma: 0. Northern Illinois: 0. Temple: 2.5. Florida Atlantic: 4. Rice: 1. SMU: 0. Charlotte: 4. Tulane: 2. North Texas: 7. East Carolina: 0

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Arkansas-Pine Bluff: 10 by 91.7. Oklahoma: 2 by 8.3. Northern Illinois: 3 by 12.5. Temple: 3 by 37.5. Florida Atlantic: 4 by 56.7. Rice: 3 by 22.5. SMU: 4 by 16.7. Charlotte: 9 by 77.5. Tulane: 5 by 40.8. North Texas: 7 by 79.2. East Carolina: 2 by 8.3

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins2 · Games = 4 · -0.6 vs Losses
Losses2.6 · Games = 7 · +0.6 vs Wins

Game Log

Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.

11 games

Featured metric

Havoc Plays

Top game by takeover score

North Texas

Best efficiency game

91.7 vs Arkansas-Pine Bluff

Result
Sat 11/25@ East CarolinaW 29-2721000
Sat 11/18vs North Texas2+ sacks · Splash gameL 28-3576430
Sat 11/11@ TulaneSplash gameL 22-2454100
Sat 11/4vs CharlotteSplash gameL 26-3395310
Sat 10/28@ SMUL 10-6943000
Thu 10/19vs RiceL 10-4232000
Sat 10/7@ Florida Atlantic2+ sacks · Splash gameL 17-2043220
Thu 9/28vs TempleSplash gameW 48-263010.500
Sat 9/23@ Northern IllinoisW 22-1433000
Sat 9/16vs OklahomaL 17-6621000
Fri 9/1vs Arkansas-Pine Bluff10+ tackles · 2+ sacksW 42-71022.5020

Career Arc

Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.

  1. 1

    Oklahoma State

    2019-2022

    Opening stop

  2. 2

    Tulsa

    2023

    Final stop

Season Value Progression

20192020202120222023
SeasonTeamPrimaryEfficiencyUsageDelta
2019 Regular SeasonOklahoma State0
2020 Regular SeasonOklahoma State00
2021 Regular SeasonOklahoma State314.25.23
2022 Regular SeasonOklahoma State16316.513
2023 Regular SeasonTulsa2641.113.410

Signature Performances

Top Games

#1 Featured game

North Texas

Loss with backfield disruption leading the way.

7

Primary metric

7 disruption/tackle impact with 69.6 takeover score.

#2

Arkansas-Pine Bluff

5.5

Primary metric

Win with backfield disruption leading the way.

5.5 disruption/tackle impact with 64.2 takeover score.

#3

Arkansas-Pine Bluff

6

Primary metric

Win with backfield disruption leading the way.

6 disruption/tackle impact with 60.6 takeover score.

#4

Texas Tech

6

Primary metric

Win with 6 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.

6 disruption/tackle impact with 57.5 takeover score.

#5

Charlotte

4

Primary metric

Loss with 4 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.

4 disruption/tackle impact with 52.6 takeover score.

Top Seasons

#1 Season by Season Value

2023 Regular Season · Tulsa

26 primary output · 41.1 efficiency · 13.4 usage

50.2

#2

2022 Regular Season · Oklahoma State

35.5

16 primary · 31 efficiency · 6.5 usage

#3

2021 Regular Season · Oklahoma State

23.2

3 primary · 14.2 efficiency · 5.2 usage

Milestones

3

Impact games

10

Splash games

1

10+ tackle games

Bio, Recruit, and Data Context

Recruit context is not available for this player in the current dataset.

Career Facts

2

Career teams

5

Seasons tracked

66

Career Tackles

Data Context

Coverage spans 5 tracked seasons, 20 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.