Player Dossier

2019-2023

East Carolina

Jaylen Johnson

WR • 6'2" • 194 lbs • Duluth, GA, USA

Reliable chain-moverPossession profile

Jaylen Johnson reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.

Usage Score

22.1

Efficiency

65

Consistency

57.5

Season Value

61.2

Career Arc

Value trend by season

Best season by Season Value: 2020 Regular Season · Georgia

192021222223

Snapshot

Career Teams
2
Seasons Tracked
6
Program Path
Georgia • East Carolina
Peak Game
Peak game by takeover score: UTSA

Scouting Read

Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.

Jaylen Johnson, WR. Best season Best season by Season Value: 2020 Regular Season · Georgia. Jaylen Johnson reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.

Jaylen Johnson played WR for Georgia and East Carolina. Across 5 tracked seasons, Jaylen Johnson recorded 6 rushing yards, 855 receiving yards, and 6 tackles. His top tracked season came in 2023 with East Carolina.

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2020 Regular Season

Georgia paired 0 primary output with — efficiency.

Supporting note

2023 Regular Season role shape

target-driven usage with 65 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value stayed steady

2023 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Multi-stop career journey

Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across Georgia, East Carolina.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: UTSA

Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2023 Regular Season · East Carolina

Games

12

Receiving Yards / G

38.8

Efficiency

65

Usage

22.1

Consistency

57.5

Best Game by takeover score

UTSA

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

123456789101112

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Michigan: 30. Marshall: 37. App State: 41. Gardner-Webb: 70. Rice: 28. SMU: 7. Charlotte: 23. UTSA: 105. Tulane: 40. Florida Atlantic: 40. Navy: 26. Tulsa: 19

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Michigan: 3 by 66.7. Marshall: 4 by 61.7. App State: 3 by 91.1. Gardner-Webb: 6 by 77.8. Rice: 4 by 46.7. SMU: 2 by 23.3. Charlotte: 3 by 51.1. UTSA: 8 by 87.5. Tulane: 3 by 88.9. Florida Atlantic: 2 by 100. Navy: 4 by 43.3. Tulsa: 3 by 42.2

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins55 · Games = 2 · +19.4 vs Losses
Losses35.6 · Games = 10 · -19.4 vs Wins

Game Log

Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.

12 games

Featured metric

Receiving Yards

Top game by takeover score

UTSA

Best efficiency game

100 vs Florida Atlantic

Result
Sat 11/25vs TulsaL 27-293196.36.30111
Sat 11/18@ NavyL 0-104266.56.50011
Sat 11/11@ Florida AtlanticW 22-72402020032
Sat 11/4vs TulaneL 10-1334013.313.30032
Sat 10/28@ UTSA100 receiving yards · High volumeL 27-41810513.113.10129
Sat 10/21vs CharlotteL 7-103237.77.70014
Thu 10/12vs SMUL 10-31273.53.5005
Sat 9/30@ RiceL 17-2442877011
Sat 9/23vs Gardner-WebbW 44-067011.711.70034
Sat 9/16@ App StateL 28-4334113.713.70039
Sat 9/9vs MarshallL 13-314379.39.30014
Sat 9/2@ MichiganL 3-303301010013

Career Arc

Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.

  1. 1

    Georgia

    2019-2021

    Opening stop

  2. 2

    East Carolina

    2022-2023

    Final stop

Season Value Progression

201920202021202220222023
SeasonTeamPrimaryEfficiencyUsageDelta
2019 Regular SeasonGeorgia2066.77.7
2020 Regular SeasonGeorgia0-20
2021 Regular SeasonGeorgia29605.529
2022 PostseasonEast Carolina34085.211.6311
2022 Regular SeasonEast Carolina34085.211.60
2023 Regular SeasonEast Carolina4666522.1126

Signature Performances

Top Games

#1 Featured game

UTSA

Loss with an explosive receiving profile.

105

Primary metric

105 receiving yards with a 87.5 efficiency score.

#2

Old Dominion

93

Primary metric

Win with an explosive receiving profile.

93 receiving yards with a 68.9 efficiency score.

#3

Clemson

21

Primary metric

Win with an explosive receiving profile.

21 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.

#4

Gardner-Webb

70

Primary metric

Win with an explosive receiving profile.

70 receiving yards with a 77.8 efficiency score.

#5

Coastal Carolina

66

Primary metric

Win with an explosive receiving profile.

66 receiving yards with a 88 efficiency score.

Top Seasons

#1 Season by Season Value

2020 Regular Season · Georgia

0 primary output · efficiency · usage

100

#2

2023 Regular Season · East Carolina

61.2

466 primary · 65 efficiency · 22.1 usage

#3

2022 Postseason · East Carolina

56.7

340 primary · 85.2 efficiency · 11.6 usage

Milestones

1

100+ receiving yards

2

8+ catch outings

0

2+ TD games

Bio, Recruit, and Data Context

Recruit context is not available for this player in the current dataset.

Career Facts

2

Career teams

6

Seasons tracked

855

Career Receiving Yards

Data Context

Coverage spans 6 tracked seasons, 27 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.