Usage Score
24.1
Player Dossier
2016-2021Washington State
WR • 5'10" • 196 lbs • Pompano Beach, FL, USA
Calvin Jackson Jr. reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Usage Score
24.1
Efficiency
82.5
Consistency
73.5
Season Value
70
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by Season Value: 2021 Postseason · Washington State
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Calvin Jackson Jr., WR. Best season Best season by Season Value: 2021 Postseason · Washington State. Calvin Jackson Jr. reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Calvin Jackson Jr. played WR for Washington State. Across 6 tracked seasons, Calvin Jackson Jr. recorded 3 rushing yards, 1,403 receiving yards, and 2 tackles. His top tracked season came in 2021 with Washington State.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2021 Postseason
Washington State paired 987 primary output with 82.5 efficiency.
Supporting note
2021 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 82.5 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2021 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Arizona State
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
13
Receiving Yards / G
75.9
Efficiency
82.5
Usage
24.1
Consistency
73.5
Best Game by takeover score
Arizona State
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Central Michigan: 32. Utah State: 91. Portland State: 77. USC: 94. Utah: 19. California: 53. Oregon State: 70. Stanford: 72. BYU: 52. Arizona State: 139. Oregon: 87. Arizona: 133. Washington: 68
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Central Michigan: 3 by 71.1. Utah State: 7 by 86.7. Portland State: 3 by 100. USC: 8 by 78.3. Utah: 2 by 63.3. California: 6 by 58.9. Oregon State: 9 by 51.9. Stanford: 2 by 100. BYU: 4 by 86.7. Arizona State: 8 by 100. Oregon: 4 by 100. Arizona: 4 by 100. Washington: 6 by 75.6
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
13 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Arizona State
Best efficiency game
100 vs Arizona
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fri 12/31 | @ Central Michigan | L 21-24 | — | 3 | 32 | 10.7 | 10.70 | 0 | 32 |
| Sat 11/27 | @ Washington | W 40-13 | — | 6 | 68 | 11.3 | 11.30 | 0 | 27 |
| Sat 11/20 | vs Arizona100 receiving yards · 2+ TD | W 44-18 | — | 4 | 133 | 33.3 | 33.30 | 2 | 78 |
| Sun 11/14 | @ Oregon | L 24-38 | — | 4 | 87 | 21.8 | 21.80 | 0 | 70 |
| Sat 10/30 | @ Arizona State100 receiving yards · High volume | W 34-21 | — | 8 | 139 | 15.8 | 17.40 | 1 | 45 |
| Sat 10/23 | vs BYU | L 19-21 | — | 4 | 52 | 13 | 13 | 0 | 22 |
| Sat 10/16 | vs Stanford | W 34-31 | — | 2 | 72 | 36 | 36 | 1 | 41 |
| Sat 10/9 | vs Oregon StateHigh volume | W 31-24 | — | 9 | 70 | 7.8 | 7.80 | 0 | 17 |
| Sat 10/2 | @ California2+ TD | W 21-6 | — | 6 | 53 | 8.8 | 8.80 | 2 | 22 |
| Sat 9/25 | @ Utah | L 13-24 | — | 2 | 19 | 9.5 | 9.50 | 0 | 12 |
| Sat 9/18 | vs USCHigh volume | L 14-45 | — | 8 | 94 | 11.8 | 11.80 | 0 | 29 |
| Sat 9/11 | vs Portland State | W 44-24 | — | 3 | 77 | 25.7 | 25.70 | 1 | 37 |
| Sun 9/5 | vs Utah State | L 23-26 | — | 7 | 91 | 13 | 13 | 0 | 32 |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Washington State
2016-2021
Opening stop
Season Value Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2016 Regular Season | Washington State | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2017 Regular Season | Washington State | 0 | — | — | 0 |
| 2018 Postseason | Washington State | 287 | 67.3 | 7.9 | 287 |
| 2018 Regular Season | Washington State | 287 | 67.3 | 7.9 | 0 |
| 2019 Regular Season | Washington State | 117 | 62.2 | 7.2 | -170 |
| 2020 Regular Season | Washington State | 12 | 40 | 11.1 | -105 |
| 2021 Postseason | Washington State | 987 | 82.5 | 24.1 | 975 |
| 2021 Regular Season | Washington State | 987 | 82.5 | 24.1 | 0 |
#1 Featured game
Arizona State
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
139
Primary metric
139 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Arizona
133
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
133 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Arizona
85
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
85 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
Oregon State
76
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
76 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
Utah State
91
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
91 receiving yards with a 86.7 efficiency score.
#1 Season by Season Value
2021 Postseason · Washington State
987 primary output · 82.5 efficiency · 24.1 usage
70
#2
2021 Regular Season · Washington State
70
987 primary · 82.5 efficiency · 24.1 usage
#3
2018 Postseason · Washington State
38.7
287 primary · 67.3 efficiency · 7.9 usage
2
100+ receiving yards
3
8+ catch outings
3
2+ TD games
Career Facts
1
Career teams
8
Seasons tracked
1,403
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 8 tracked seasons, 26 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Next best actions
Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.