Usage Score
12.7
Player Dossier
2018-2021UCLA
Delon Hurt
WR • 6'0" • 201 lbs • Ontario, CA, USA
Reliable chain-moverPossession profile
Delon Hurt reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
98.5
Consistency
73.8
Season Value
70.9
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2020 Regular Season · UCLA
18192021
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 4
- Program Path
- UCLA
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Arizona State
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Delon Hurt, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2020 Regular Season · UCLA. Delon Hurt reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2020 Regular Season
UCLA paired 122 primary output with 98.5 efficiency.
Supporting note
2020 Regular Season role shape
target-driven usage with 98.5 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value cooled off
2021 Regular Season fell back from the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Arizona State
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2020 Regular Season · UCLA
Games
3
Receiving Yards / G
40.7
Efficiency
98.5
Usage
12.7
Consistency
73.8
Best Game by takeover score
Stanford
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
123
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Arizona State: 62. USC: 43. Stanford: 17
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Arizona State: 4 by 100. USC: 3 by 95.6. Stanford: 1 by 100
Split Comparison
Losses30 · n=2
First Half52.5 · n=2
All Games40.7 · n=3
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
3 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Arizona State
Best efficiency game
100 vs Stanford
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
UCLA
2018-2021
Opening stop
Season Progression
2018201920202021
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2018 Regular Season | UCLA | 15 | 100 | 4.2 | — |
| 2019 Regular Season | UCLA | 5 | 33.3 | 3.2 | -10 |
| 2020 Regular Season | UCLA | 122 | 98.5 | 12.7 | 117 |
| 2021 Regular Season | UCLA | 0 | — | — | -122 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Arizona State
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
62
Primary metric
62 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Oregon
15
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
15 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
USC
43
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
43 receiving yards with a 95.6 efficiency score.
#4
California
5
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
5 receiving yards with a 33.3 efficiency score.
#5
Stanford
17
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
17 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2020 Regular Season · UCLA
122 primary output · 98.5 efficiency · 12.7 usage
70.9
#2
2019 Regular Season · UCLA
35.1
5 primary · 33.3 efficiency · 3.2 usage
#3
2018 Regular Season · UCLA
31.1
15 primary · 100 efficiency · 4.2 usage
Milestones
0
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
0
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
3★
Class 2018 · Rating 0.8809
Servite · Anaheim, CA
- Committed To
- UCLA
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2018
Career Facts
1
Career teams
4
Seasons tracked
142
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 4 tracked seasons, 8 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.