Usage Score
20.5
Player Dossier
2021-2022Middle Tennessee
Izaiah Gathings
WR • 6'4" • 222 lbs • Statesville, NC, USA
Reliable chain-moverPossession profile
Izaiah Gathings reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
64.2
Consistency
56.6
Season Value
60.3
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by Season Value: 2022 Postseason · Middle Tennessee
21212222
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 4
- Program Path
- Middle Tennessee
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: East Carolina
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Izaiah Gathings, WR. Best season Best season by Season Value: 2022 Postseason · Middle Tennessee. Izaiah Gathings reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Izaiah Gathings played WR for Middle Tennessee. Across 2 tracked seasons, Izaiah Gathings recorded 861 receiving yards and 3 touchdowns. His top tracked season came in 2022 with Middle Tennessee.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2022 Postseason
Middle Tennessee paired 559 primary output with 64.2 efficiency.
Supporting note
2022 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 64.2 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2022 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: UTSA
Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2022 Postseason · Middle Tennessee
Games
11
Receiving Yards / G
50.8
Efficiency
64.2
Usage
20.5
Consistency
56.6
Best Game by takeover score
UTSA
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Game-by-Game Trend
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. San Diego State: 69. James Madison: 34. Colorado State: 92. Tennessee State: 30. Miami: 19. UTSA: 97. UAB: 38. Western Kentucky: 42. UTEP: 22. Florida Atlantic: 39. Florida International: 77
Volume vs Efficiency
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. San Diego State: 7 by 65.7. James Madison: 6 by 37.8. Colorado State: 11 by 55.8. Tennessee State: 3 by 66.7. Miami: 4 by 31.7. UTSA: 9 by 71.9. UAB: 3 by 84.4. Western Kentucky: 3 by 93.3. UTEP: 2 by 73.3. Florida Atlantic: 5 by 52. Florida International: 7 by 73.3
Split Comparison
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Wins49.7 · Games = 7 · -3.0 vs Losses
Losses52.8 · Games = 4 · +3.0 vs Wins
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
11 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
UTSA
Best efficiency game
93.3 vs Western Kentucky
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sun 12/25 | @ San Diego State | W 25-23 | — | 7 | 69 | 9.9 | 9.90 | 0 | 22 |
| Sat 11/26 | @ Florida International | W 33-28 | — | 7 | 77 | 11 | 11 | 0 | 22 |
| Sat 11/19 | vs Florida Atlantic | W 49-21 | — | 5 | 39 | 7.8 | 7.80 | 1 | 13 |
| Sun 10/30 | @ UTEP | W 24-13 | — | 2 | 22 | 11 | 11 | 0 | 13 |
| Sat 10/15 | vs Western Kentucky | L 17-35 | — | 3 | 42 | 14 | 14 | 1 | 25 |
| Sat 10/8 | @ UAB | L 14-41 | — | 3 | 38 | 12.7 | 12.70 | 0 | 20 |
| Fri 9/30 | vs UTSAHigh volume | L 30-45 | — | 9 | 97 | 10.8 | 10.80 | 0 | 24 |
| Sat 9/24 | @ Miami | W 45-31 | — | 4 | 19 | 4.8 | 4.80 | 0 | 7 |
| Sat 9/17 | vs Tennessee State | W 49-6 | — | 3 | 30 | 10 | 10 | 0 | 21 |
| Sat 9/10 | @ Colorado StateHigh volume | W 34-19 | — | 11 | 92 | 8.4 | 8.40 | 0 | 26 |
| Sat 9/3 | @ James Madison | L 7-44 | — | 6 | 34 | 5.7 | 5.70 | 0 | 11 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Middle Tennessee
2021-2022
Opening stop
Season Value Progression
2021202120222022
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 Postseason | Middle Tennessee | 302 | 77 | 10.9 | — |
| 2021 Regular Season | Middle Tennessee | 302 | 77 | 10.9 | 0 |
| 2022 Postseason | Middle Tennessee | 559 | 64.2 | 20.5 | 257 |
| 2022 Regular Season | Middle Tennessee | 559 | 64.2 | 20.5 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
East Carolina
Game with an explosive receiving profile.
83
Primary metric
83 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
UTSA
65
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
65 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
App State
7
Primary metric
Game with an explosive receiving profile.
7 receiving yards with a 46.7 efficiency score.
#4
Charlotte
38
Primary metric
Game with an explosive receiving profile.
38 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
UTSA
97
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
97 receiving yards with a 71.9 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by Season Value
2022 Postseason · Middle Tennessee
559 primary output · 64.2 efficiency · 20.5 usage
60.3
#2
2022 Regular Season · Middle Tennessee
60.3
559 primary · 64.2 efficiency · 20.5 usage
#3
2021 Postseason · Middle Tennessee
48.4
302 primary · 77 efficiency · 10.9 usage
Milestones
0
100+ receiving yards
2
8+ catch outings
0
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Career Facts
1
Career teams
4
Seasons tracked
861
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 4 tracked seasons, 24 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Next best actions
Keep exploring Izaiah Gathings
Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.