Usage Score
18.8
Player Dossier
2017-2019UAB
WR • 5'10" • 175 lbs • Hattiesburg, MS, USA
Kendall Parham reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Usage Score
18.8
Efficiency
83.4
Consistency
60.8
Season Value
65.8
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by Season Value: 2019 Regular Season · UAB
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Kendall Parham, WR. Best season Best season by Season Value: 2019 Regular Season · UAB. Kendall Parham reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Kendall Parham played WR for UAB. Across 3 tracked seasons, Kendall Parham recorded 81 rushing yards, 805 receiving yards, and 3 tackles. His top tracked season came in 2019 with UAB.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2019 Regular Season
UAB paired 608 primary output with 83.4 efficiency.
Supporting note
2019 Regular Season role shape
target-driven usage with 83.4 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value is trending up
2019 Regular Season improved on the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Rice
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
11
Receiving Yards / G
55.3
Efficiency
83.4
Usage
18.8
Consistency
60.8
Best Game by takeover score
Rice
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Alabama State: 23. Akron: 94. South Alabama: 107. Western Kentucky: 21. Rice: 109. UTSA: 82. Old Dominion: 82. Tennessee: 30. Southern Miss: -4. Louisiana Tech: 4. North Texas: 60
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Alabama State: 1 by 100. Akron: 4 by 100. South Alabama: 3 by 100. Western Kentucky: 1 by 100. Rice: 3 by 100. UTSA: 6 by 91.1. Old Dominion: 5 by 100. Tennessee: 2 by 100. Southern Miss: 1 by 0. Louisiana Tech: 1 by 26.7. North Texas: 2 by 100
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
11 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Rice
Best efficiency game
100 vs North Texas
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 11/30 | @ North Texas | W 26-21 | — | 2 | 60 | 23.7 | 30 | 0 | 36 |
| Sat 11/23 | vs Louisiana Tech | W 20-14 | — | 1 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 0 | 4 |
| Sat 11/9 | @ Southern Miss | L 2-37 | — | 1 | -4 | -4 | -4 | 0 | 0 |
| Sat 11/2 | @ Tennessee | L 7-30 | — | 2 | 30 | 15 | 15 | 0 | 21 |
| Sat 10/19 | vs Old Dominion | W 38-14 | — | 5 | 82 | 16.4 | 16.40 | 1 | 32 |
| Sat 10/12 | @ UTSA | W 33-14 | — | 6 | 82 | 13.7 | 13.70 | 0 | 19 |
| Sat 10/5 | vs Rice100 receiving yards · 2+ TD | W 35-20 | — | 3 | 109 | 36.3 | 36.30 | 2 | 57 |
| Sat 9/28 | @ Western Kentucky | L 13-20 | — | 1 | 21 | 21 | 21 | 0 | 21 |
| Sat 9/21 | vs South Alabama100 receiving yards | W 35-3 | — | 3 | 107 | 35.7 | 35.70 | 1 | 67 |
| Sat 9/7 | @ Akron | W 31-20 | — | 4 | 94 | 23.5 | 23.50 | 1 | 49 |
| Fri 8/30 | vs Alabama State | W 24-19 | — | 1 | 23 | 23 | 23 | 1 | 23 |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
UAB
2017-2019
Opening stop
Season Value Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2017 Regular Season | UAB | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2018 Postseason | UAB | 197 | 74.8 | 16.1 | 197 |
| 2018 Regular Season | UAB | 197 | 74.8 | 16.1 | 0 |
| 2019 Regular Season | UAB | 608 | 83.4 | 18.8 | 411 |
#1 Featured game
Coastal Carolina
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
65
Primary metric
65 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Rice
109
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
109 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Akron
94
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
94 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
South Alabama
107
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
107 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
Old Dominion
82
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
82 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#1 Season by Season Value
2019 Regular Season · UAB
608 primary output · 83.4 efficiency · 18.8 usage
65.8
#2
2018 Postseason · UAB
40.9
197 primary · 74.8 efficiency · 16.1 usage
#3
2018 Regular Season · UAB
40.9
197 primary · 74.8 efficiency · 16.1 usage
2
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
1
2+ TD games
Career Facts
1
Career teams
4
Seasons tracked
805
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 4 tracked seasons, 21 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Next best actions
Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.