Usage Score
22.5
Player Profile
Brenden Brady
RB • 5'11" • 215 lbs • Cibolo, TX, USA
Balanced backfield optionSteady chain mover
Brenden Brady leans balanced backfield option traits and 48.7 efficiency.
Efficiency
48.7
Consistency
69.4
Season Value
58.9
Career Arc
Season-by-season value trend
Best season by value score: 2022 Regular Season · UTSA
181920212122
Quick Facts
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 6
- Primary stop by seasons
- UTSA
- Best season by value score
- Best season by value score: 2022 Regular Season · UTSA
- Peak game by takeover score
- Peak game by takeover score: North Texas
Brenden Brady, RB. Best season Best season by value score: 2022 Regular Season · UTSA. Brenden Brady leans balanced backfield option traits and 48.7 efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2022 Regular Season
UTSA paired 889 primary output with 48.7 efficiency.
Supporting note
2022 Regular Season role shape
backfield-heavy usage with 48.7 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value is trending up
2022 Regular Season improved on the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Middle Tennessee
Win with 135 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2022 Regular Season · UTSA
Games
12
Scrimmage Yards / G
74.1
Efficiency
48.7
Usage
22.5
Consistency
69.4
Best Game by takeover score
UTEP
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
123456789101112
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Houston: 27. Army: 78. Texas: 85. Unknown: 64. Middle Tennessee: 135. Western Kentucky: 133. Florida International: 58. North Texas: 112. UAB: 53. Louisiana Tech: 68. Rice: 67. UTEP: 9
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Houston: 8 by 25.5. Army: 20 by 41.3. Texas: 23 by 36.2. Unknown: 16 by 38.5. Middle Tennessee: 22 by 57.8. Western Kentucky: 23 by 51.1. Florida International: 9 by 43.8. North Texas: 19 by 61.4. UAB: 14 by 39.4. Louisiana Tech: 10 by 69.7. Rice: 6 by 96.5. UTEP: 4 by 23.4
Split Comparison
Wins79.2 · n=9 · +23.2 vs Losses
Losses56 · n=2 · -23.2 vs Wins
First Half87 · n=6 · +25.8 vs Second Half
Second Half61.2 · n=6 · -25.8 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
12 games
Featured metric
Scrimmage Yards
Top game by takeover score
Middle Tennessee
Best efficiency game
96.5 vs Rice
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 11/26 | vs UTEP | W 34-31 | 4 | 9 | 2.30 | 0 | — | — | 2.3 |
| Sat 11/19 | @ Rice | W 41-7 | 6 | 67 | 11.20 | 0 | — | — | 11.2 |
| Sat 11/12 | vs Louisiana Tech2+ TD | W 51-7 | 8 | 53 | 6.60 | 2 | 2 | 15 | 6.8 |
| Sat 11/5 | @ UAB | W 44-38 | 14 | 53 | 3.80 | 0 | — | — | 3.8 |
| Sat 10/22 | vs North Texas100 rush yards · 2+ TD | W 31-27 | 19 | 112 | 5.90 | 2 | — | — | 5.9 |
| Sat 10/15 | @ Florida International | W 30-10 | 7 | 19 | 2.70 | 0 | 2 | 39 | 6.4 |
| Sat 10/8 | vs Western Kentucky | W 31-28 | 19 | 82 | 4.30 | 1 | 4 | 51 | 5.8 |
| Fri 9/30 | @ Middle Tennessee | W 45-30 | 19 | 98 | 5.20 | 1 | 3 | 37 | 6.1 |
| Sat 9/24 | vs Unknown | — | 14 | 49 | 3.50 | 0 | 2 | 15 | 4 |
| Sun 9/18 | @ Texas | L 20-41 | 21 | 70 | 3.30 | 1 | 2 | 15 | 3.7 |
| Sat 9/10 | @ Army2+ TD | W 41-38 | 19 | 76 | 4 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 3.9 |
| Sat 9/3 | vs Houston | L 35-37 | 6 | 11 | 1.80 | 0 | 2 | 16 | 3.4 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
UTSA
2018-2022
Opening stop
Season Progression
201820192020202120212022
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2018 Regular Season | UTSA | 265 | 42.6 | 16.6 | — |
| 2019 Regular Season | UTSA | 386 | 42.6 | 11.5 | 121 |
| 2020 Regular Season | UTSA | 287 | 41.8 | 14.4 | -99 |
| 2021 Postseason | UTSA | 345 | 48.1 | 14.2 | 58 |
| 2021 Regular Season | UTSA | 345 | 48.1 | 14.2 | 0 |
| 2022 Regular Season | UTSA | 889 | 48.7 | 22.5 | 544 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
North Texas
Loss with 97 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
97
Primary metric
97 scrimmage yards and 24 usage.
#2
North Texas
71
Primary metric
Loss with 71 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
71 scrimmage yards and 10.6 usage.
#3
UTEP
150
Primary metric
Win driven by a workhorse rushing load.
150 scrimmage yards and 41.8 usage.
#4
Middle Tennessee
135
Primary metric
Win with 135 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
135 scrimmage yards and 30.1 usage.
#5
Florida Atlantic
89
Primary metric
Loss with 89 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
89 scrimmage yards and 28.6 usage.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2022 Regular Season · UTSA
889 primary output · 48.7 efficiency · 22.5 usage
58.9
#2
2021 Postseason · UTSA
39
345 primary · 48.1 efficiency · 14.2 usage
#3
2021 Regular Season · UTSA
39
345 primary · 48.1 efficiency · 14.2 usage
Milestones
4
100+ rush yards
1
150+ scrimmage yards
4
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
3★
Class 2018 · Rating 0.8376
Steele · Cibolo, TX
- Committed To
- UTSA
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2018
Career Facts
1
Career teams
6
Seasons tracked
2,172
Career Scrimmage Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 6 tracked seasons, 46 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Career Metric Focus
Switch the career lens without tearing down the page.