Usage Score
22.5
Player Dossier
2018-2022UTSA
RB • 5'11" • 215 lbs • Cibolo, TX, USA
Brenden Brady leans balanced backfield option traits and 48.7 efficiency.
Usage Score
22.5
Efficiency
48.7
Consistency
69.4
Season Value
58.9
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2022 Regular Season · UTSA
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Brenden Brady, RB. Best season Best season by value score: 2022 Regular Season · UTSA. Brenden Brady leans balanced backfield option traits and 48.7 efficiency.
Brenden Brady played RB for UTSA. Across 5 tracked seasons, Brenden Brady recorded 67 passing yards, 1,738 rushing yards, and 434 receiving yards. His top tracked season came in 2022 with UTSA.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2022 Regular Season
UTSA paired 889 primary output with 48.7 efficiency.
Supporting note
2022 Regular Season role shape
backfield-heavy usage with 48.7 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value is trending up
2022 Regular Season improved on the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Middle Tennessee
Win with 135 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
12
Scrimmage Yards / G
74.1
Efficiency
48.7
Usage
22.5
Consistency
69.4
Best Game by takeover score
UTEP
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Houston: 27. Army: 78. Texas: 85. Unknown: 64. Middle Tennessee: 135. Western Kentucky: 133. Florida International: 58. North Texas: 112. UAB: 53. Louisiana Tech: 68. Rice: 67. UTEP: 9
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Houston: 8 by 25.5. Army: 20 by 41.3. Texas: 23 by 36.2. Unknown: 16 by 38.5. Middle Tennessee: 22 by 57.8. Western Kentucky: 23 by 51.1. Florida International: 9 by 43.8. North Texas: 19 by 61.4. UAB: 14 by 39.4. Louisiana Tech: 10 by 69.7. Rice: 6 by 96.5. UTEP: 4 by 23.4
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
12 games
Featured metric
Scrimmage Yards
Top game by takeover score
Middle Tennessee
Best efficiency game
96.5 vs Rice
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 11/26 | vs UTEP | W 34-31 | 4 | 9 | 2.30 | 0 | — | — | 2.3 |
| Sat 11/19 | @ Rice | W 41-7 | 6 | 67 | 11.20 | 0 | — | — | 11.2 |
| Sat 11/12 | vs Louisiana Tech2+ TD | W 51-7 | 8 | 53 | 6.60 | 2 | 2 | 15 | 6.8 |
| Sat 11/5 | @ UAB | W 44-38 | 14 | 53 | 3.80 | 0 | — | — | 3.8 |
| Sat 10/22 | vs North Texas100 rush yards · 2+ TD | W 31-27 | 19 | 112 | 5.90 | 2 | — | — | 5.9 |
| Sat 10/15 | @ Florida International | W 30-10 | 7 | 19 | 2.70 | 0 | 2 | 39 | 6.4 |
| Sat 10/8 | vs Western Kentucky | W 31-28 | 19 | 82 | 4.30 | 1 | 4 | 51 | 5.8 |
| Fri 9/30 | @ Middle Tennessee | W 45-30 | 19 | 98 | 5.20 | 1 | 3 | 37 | 6.1 |
| Sat 9/24 | vs Unknown | — | 14 | 49 | 3.50 | 0 | 2 | 15 | 4 |
| Sun 9/18 | @ Texas | L 20-41 | 21 | 70 | 3.30 | 1 | 2 | 15 | 3.7 |
| Sat 9/10 | @ Army2+ TD | W 41-38 | 19 | 76 | 4 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 3.9 |
| Sat 9/3 | vs Houston | L 35-37 | 6 | 11 | 1.80 | 0 | 2 | 16 | 3.4 |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
UTSA
2018-2022
Opening stop
Season Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2018 Regular Season | UTSA | 265 | 42.6 | 16.6 | — |
| 2019 Regular Season | UTSA | 386 | 42.6 | 11.5 | 121 |
| 2020 Regular Season | UTSA | 287 | 41.8 | 14.4 | -99 |
| 2021 Postseason | UTSA | 345 | 48.1 | 14.2 | 58 |
| 2021 Regular Season | UTSA | 345 | 48.1 | 14.2 | 0 |
| 2022 Regular Season | UTSA | 889 | 48.7 | 22.5 | 544 |
#1 Featured game
North Texas
Loss with 97 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
97
Primary metric
97 scrimmage yards and 24 usage.
#2
North Texas
71
Primary metric
Loss with 71 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
71 scrimmage yards and 10.6 usage.
#3
UTEP
150
Primary metric
Win driven by a workhorse rushing load.
150 scrimmage yards and 41.8 usage.
#4
Middle Tennessee
135
Primary metric
Win with 135 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
135 scrimmage yards and 30.1 usage.
#5
Florida Atlantic
89
Primary metric
Loss with 89 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
89 scrimmage yards and 28.6 usage.
#1 Season by value score
2022 Regular Season · UTSA
889 primary output · 48.7 efficiency · 22.5 usage
58.9
#2
2021 Postseason · UTSA
39
345 primary · 48.1 efficiency · 14.2 usage
#3
2021 Regular Season · UTSA
39
345 primary · 48.1 efficiency · 14.2 usage
4
100+ rush yards
1
150+ scrimmage yards
4
2+ TD games
Recruit Profile
Class 2018 · Rating 0.8376
Steele · Cibolo, TX
Career Facts
1
Career teams
6
Seasons tracked
2,172
Career Scrimmage Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 6 tracked seasons, 46 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.