Player Dossier

2017-2020

Ohio State

Justin Fields

QB • 6'3" • 228 lbs • Kennesaw, GA, USA

Balanced quarterback profileEfficient finisher

Justin Fields is a balanced quarterback profile with 23.1 usage in the latest tracked season.

Usage Score

23.1

Efficiency

70.4

Consistency

87.6

Season Value

61.8

Career Arc

Value trend by season

Best season by Season Value: 2019 Postseason · Ohio State

171819192020

Snapshot

Career Teams
2
Seasons Tracked
6
Program Path
Georgia • Ohio State
Peak Game
Peak game by takeover score: Massachusetts

Scouting Read

Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.

Justin Fields, QB. Best season Best season by Season Value: 2019 Postseason · Ohio State. Justin Fields is a balanced quarterback profile with 23.1 usage in the latest tracked season.

Justin Fields played QB for Georgia and Ohio State. Across 4 tracked seasons, Justin Fields recorded 5,701 passing yards, 1,133 rushing yards, and -10 receiving yards. His top tracked season came in 2019 with Ohio State.

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2019 Postseason

Ohio State paired 3,757 primary output with 70.4 efficiency.

Supporting note

2020 Postseason role shape

pass-led usage with 70.4 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value stayed steady

2020 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Multi-stop career journey

Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across Georgia, Ohio State.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: Clemson

Win with 427 yards of offense and 79.2 efficiency. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2020 Postseason · Ohio State

Games

8

Primary Metric / G

310.4

Efficiency

70.4

Usage

23.1

Consistency

87.6

Best Game by takeover score

Clemson

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

12345678

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Alabama: 261. Clemson: 427. Nebraska: 330. Penn State: 314. Rutgers: 321. Indiana: 378. Michigan State: 303. Northwestern: 149

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Alabama: 39 by 75.1. Clemson: 36 by 79.2. Nebraska: 36 by 82.8. Penn State: 40 by 65.1. Rutgers: 34 by 72.7. Indiana: 45 by 63.8. Michigan State: 37 by 80. Northwestern: 39 by 44.8

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins317.4 · Games = 7 · +56.4 vs Losses
Losses261 · Games = 1 · -56.4 vs Wins

Game Log

Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.

8 games

Featured metric

Total Offense

Top game by takeover score

Clemson

Best efficiency game

82.8 vs Nebraska

Result
Tue 1/12@ AlabamaDual-threatL 24-52173319451.51075.166711.20033
Sat 1/2@ Clemson300-yard game · 3+ TDW 49-28222838578.66179.28425.30017
Sat 12/19vs NorthwesternW 22-10122711444.40244.812352.90024
Sat 12/5@ Michigan State3+ TD · Dual-threatW 52-12172419970.82080131048244
Sat 11/21vs Indiana300-yard game · 3+ TDW 42-35183030060.02363.815785.20130
Sun 11/8vs Rutgers300-yard game · 3+ TDW 49-27242831485.75072.7671.2019
Sat 10/31@ Penn State300-yard game · 3+ TDW 38-25283431882.44065.16-4-0.7006
Sat 10/24vs Nebraska3+ TD · Dual-threatW 52-17202127695.22082.815543.60117

Career Arc

Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.

  1. 1

    Georgia

    2017-2018

    Opening stop

  2. 2

    Ohio State

    2019-2020

    Final stop

Season Value Progression

201720182019201920202020
SeasonTeamPrimaryEfficiencyUsageDelta
2017 Regular SeasonGeorgia0
2018 Regular SeasonGeorgia59460.68.4594
2019 PostseasonOhio State3,75770.420.53,163
2019 Regular SeasonOhio State3,75770.420.50
2020 PostseasonOhio State2,48370.423.1-1,274
2020 Regular SeasonOhio State2,48370.423.10

Signature Performances

Top Games

#1 Featured game

Massachusetts

Win with balanced pass-rush production and strong creator value.

221

Primary metric

221 total offense with 90.6 efficiency.

#2

Rutgers

335

Primary metric

Win with 335 yards of offense and 94.7 efficiency.

335 total offense with 94.7 efficiency.

#3

Clemson

427

Primary metric

Win with 427 yards of offense and 79.2 efficiency.

427 total offense with 79.2 efficiency.

#4

Nebraska

330

Primary metric

Win with balanced pass-rush production and strong creator value.

330 total offense with 82.8 efficiency.

#5

Clemson

333

Primary metric

Loss shaped by high passing volume and turnover pressure.

333 total offense with 53.8 efficiency.

Top Seasons

#1 Season by Season Value

2019 Postseason · Ohio State

3,757 primary output · 70.4 efficiency · 20.5 usage

69.5

#2

2019 Regular Season · Ohio State

69.5

3,757 primary · 70.4 efficiency · 20.5 usage

#3

2020 Postseason · Ohio State

61.8

2,483 primary · 70.4 efficiency · 23.1 usage

Milestones

9

250+ passing yards

10

300+ total offense

19

3+ TD games

26

Above avg efficiency

Bio, Recruit, and Data Context

Recruit context is not available for this player in the current dataset.

Career Facts

2

Career teams

6

Seasons tracked

6,834

Career Total Offense

Data Context

Coverage spans 6 tracked seasons, 34 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.