Usage Score
12
Player Dossier
2017-2022Ball State
Amir Abdur-Rahman
WR • 6'3" • 225 lbs • Atlanta, GA, USA
Reliable chain-moverPossession profile
Amir Abdur-Rahman reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
56.7
Consistency
39
Season Value
41.2
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by Season Value: 2020 Regular Season · Vanderbilt
17181819202122
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 2
- Seasons Tracked
- 7
- Program Path
- Vanderbilt • Ball State
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Kentucky
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Amir Abdur-Rahman, WR. Best season Best season by Season Value: 2020 Regular Season · Vanderbilt. Amir Abdur-Rahman reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Amir Abdur-Rahman played WR for Vanderbilt and Ball State. Across 6 tracked seasons, Amir Abdur-Rahman recorded 858 receiving yards, 2 tackles, and 4 touchdowns. His top tracked season came in 2020 with Vanderbilt.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2020 Regular Season
Vanderbilt paired 402 primary output with 94.4 efficiency.
Supporting note
2022 Regular Season role shape
target-driven usage with 56.7 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value is trending up
2022 Regular Season improved on the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Multi-stop career journey
Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across Vanderbilt, Ball State.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Western Michigan
Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2022 Regular Season · Ball State
Games
8
Receiving Yards / G
28.8
Efficiency
56.7
Usage
12
Consistency
39
Best Game by takeover score
Western Michigan
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Game-by-Game Trend
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Tennessee: 42. Western Michigan: 90. Murray State: 4. Georgia Southern: 47. UConn: 24. Eastern Michigan: 13. Kent State: 3. Miami (OH): 7
Volume vs Efficiency
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Tennessee: 5 by 56. Western Michigan: 7 by 85.7. Murray State: 1 by 26.7. Georgia Southern: 4 by 78.3. UConn: 3 by 53.3. Eastern Michigan: 1 by 86.7. Kent State: 1 by 20. Miami (OH): 1 by 46.7
Split Comparison
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Wins10.3 · Games = 3 · -29.5 vs Losses
Losses39.8 · Games = 5 · +29.5 vs Wins
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
8 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Western Michigan
Best efficiency game
86.7 vs Eastern Michigan
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wed 11/23 | @ Miami (OH) | L 17-18 | — | 1 | 7 | 7 | 7 | 0 | 7 |
| Tue 11/1 | @ Kent State | W 27-20 | — | 1 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 3 |
| Sat 10/22 | vs Eastern Michigan | L 16-20 | — | 1 | 13 | 13 | 13 | 0 | 13 |
| Sat 10/15 | vs UConn | W 25-21 | — | 3 | 24 | 8 | 8 | 0 | 12 |
| Sat 9/24 | @ Georgia Southern | L 23-34 | — | 4 | 47 | 11.8 | 11.80 | 0 | 17 |
| Sat 9/17 | vs Murray State | W 31-0 | — | 1 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 0 | 4 |
| Sat 9/10 | vs Western Michigan | L 30-37 | — | 7 | 90 | 12.9 | 12.90 | 1 | 39 |
| Thu 9/1 | @ Tennessee | L 10-59 | — | 5 | 42 | 8.4 | 8.40 | 0 | 16 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Vanderbilt
2017-2021
Opening stop
- 2
Ball State
2022
Final stop
Season Value Progression
2017201820182019202020212022
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2017 Regular Season | Vanderbilt | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2018 Postseason | Vanderbilt | 108 | 100 | 5.5 | 108 |
| 2018 Regular Season | Vanderbilt | 108 | 100 | 5.5 | 0 |
| 2019 Regular Season | Vanderbilt | 0 | — | — | -108 |
| 2020 Regular Season | Vanderbilt | 402 | 94.4 | 17.3 | 402 |
| 2021 Regular Season | Vanderbilt | 118 | 50.2 | 13.7 | -284 |
| 2022 Regular Season | Ball State | 230 | 56.7 | 12 | 112 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Kentucky
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
89
Primary metric
89 receiving yards with a 84.8 efficiency score.
#2
Western Michigan
90
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
90 receiving yards with a 85.7 efficiency score.
#3
Baylor
52
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
52 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
Texas A&M
72
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
72 receiving yards with a 96 efficiency score.
#5
Kentucky
65
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
65 receiving yards with a 61.9 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by Season Value
2020 Regular Season · Vanderbilt
402 primary output · 94.4 efficiency · 17.3 usage
73.7
#2
2018 Postseason · Vanderbilt
51.7
108 primary · 100 efficiency · 5.5 usage
#3
2018 Regular Season · Vanderbilt
51.7
108 primary · 100 efficiency · 5.5 usage
Milestones
0
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
0
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Career Facts
2
Career teams
7
Seasons tracked
858
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 7 tracked seasons, 24 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Next best actions
Keep exploring Amir Abdur-Rahman
Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.