Usage Score
10.3
Player Dossier
2018-2023Central Michigan
Thomas Pannunzio
WR • 5'8" • 180 lbs • Pueblo, CO, USA
Reliable chain-moverPossession profile
Thomas Pannunzio reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
42.9
Consistency
29.3
Season Value
45.6
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by Season Value: 2018 Regular Season · Colorado State
181920212223
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 2
- Seasons Tracked
- 6
- Program Path
- Colorado State • Central Michigan
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Toledo
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Thomas Pannunzio, WR. Best season Best season by Season Value: 2018 Regular Season · Colorado State. Thomas Pannunzio reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Thomas Pannunzio played WR for Colorado State and Central Michigan. Across 6 tracked seasons, Thomas Pannunzio recorded 25 rushing yards, 99 receiving yards, and 38 tackles. His top tracked season came in 2023 with Central Michigan.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2018 Regular Season
Colorado State paired 0 primary output with — efficiency.
Supporting note
2023 Regular Season role shape
target-driven usage with 42.9 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value cooled off
2023 Regular Season fell back from the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Multi-stop career journey
Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across Colorado State, Central Michigan.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Toledo
Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2023 Regular Season · Central Michigan
Games
9
Receiving Yards / G
11
Efficiency
42.9
Usage
10.3
Consistency
29.3
Best Game by takeover score
Toledo
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Game-by-Game Trend
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. South Alabama: 6. Eastern Michigan: 0. Buffalo: 11. Akron: 7. Ball State: 5. Northern Illinois: 0. Western Michigan: 20. Ohio: -10. Toledo: 60
Volume vs Efficiency
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. South Alabama: 1 by 40. Buffalo: 2 by 36.7. Akron: 2 by 23.3. Ball State: 1 by 33.3. Western Michigan: 2 by 66.7. Ohio: 1 by 0. Toledo: 3 by 100
Split Comparison
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Wins3.3 · Games = 4 · -13.9 vs Losses
Losses17.2 · Games = 5 · +13.9 vs Wins
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
9 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Toledo
Best efficiency game
100 vs Toledo
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fri 11/24 | vs Toledo | L 17-32 | — | 3 | 60 | 20 | 20 | 1 | 49 |
| Thu 11/16 | @ Ohio | L 20-34 | — | 1 | -10 | -10 | -10 | 0 | -10 |
| Wed 11/8 | @ Western Michigan | L 28-38 | — | 2 | 20 | 10 | 10 | 0 | 13 |
| Tue 10/31 | vs Northern Illinois | W 37-31 | — | — | — | 1 | — | — | — |
| Sat 10/21 | @ Ball State | L 17-24 | — | 1 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 0 | 5 |
| Sat 10/14 | vs Akron | W 17-10 | — | 2 | 7 | 3.5 | 3.50 | 0 | 6 |
| Sat 10/7 | @ Buffalo | L 13-37 | — | 2 | 11 | 5.5 | 5.50 | 0 | 6 |
| Sat 9/30 | vs Eastern Michigan | W 26-23 | — | — | — | 14.5 | — | — | — |
| Sat 9/23 | @ South Alabama | W 34-30 | — | 1 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 0 | 6 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Colorado State
2018-2022
Opening stop
- 2
Central Michigan
2023
Final stop
Season Value Progression
201820192020202120222023
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2018 Regular Season | Colorado State | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2019 Regular Season | Colorado State | 0 | — | — | 0 |
| 2020 Regular Season | Colorado State | 0 | — | 0 | 0 |
| 2021 Regular Season | Colorado State | 0 | — | 0 | 0 |
| 2022 Regular Season | Colorado State | 0 | — | — | 0 |
| 2023 Regular Season | Central Michigan | 99 | 42.9 | 10.3 | 99 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Toledo
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
60
Primary metric
60 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Western Michigan
20
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
20 receiving yards with a 66.7 efficiency score.
#3
Buffalo
11
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
11 receiving yards with a 36.7 efficiency score.
#4
South Alabama
6
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
6 receiving yards with a 40 efficiency score.
#5
Ball State
5
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
5 receiving yards with a 33.3 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by Season Value
2018 Regular Season · Colorado State
0 primary output · — efficiency · — usage
100
#2
2019 Regular Season · Colorado State
100
0 primary · — efficiency · — usage
#3
2022 Regular Season · Colorado State
100
0 primary · — efficiency · — usage
Milestones
0
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
0
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Career Facts
2
Career teams
6
Seasons tracked
99
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 6 tracked seasons, 31 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Next best actions
Keep exploring Thomas Pannunzio
Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.