Usage Score
5.7
Player Dossier
2018-2023North Texas
Larry Nixon III
LB • 6'1" • 231 lbs • North Richland Hills, TX, USA
Ball-hunting defenderSplash play profile
Larry Nixon III shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 21.2 disruption score.
Efficiency
21.2
Consistency
9.1
Season Value
9.7
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2018 Regular Season · North Texas
181920202121222323
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 2
- Seasons Tracked
- 9
- Program Path
- North Texas • Auburn
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: SMU
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Larry Nixon III, LB. Best season Best season by value score: 2018 Regular Season · North Texas. Larry Nixon III shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 21.2 disruption score.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2018 Regular Season
North Texas paired 0 primary output with 0 efficiency.
Supporting note
2023 Postseason role shape
impact-led usage with 21.2 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2023 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Multi-stop career journey
Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across North Texas, Auburn.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: California
Win with 1 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2023 Postseason · Auburn
Games
11
Havoc Plays / G
0.2
Efficiency
21.2
Usage
5.7
Consistency
9.1
Best Game by takeover score
Maryland
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
1234567891011
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Maryland: 0. California: 1. Unknown: 0. Texas A&M: 0. Georgia: 0.5. LSU: 0. Ole Miss: 0. Mississippi State: 0. Arkansas: 0. New Mexico State: 1. Alabama: 0
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Maryland: 2 by 8.3. California: 5 by 30.8. Unknown: 5 by 20.8. Texas A&M: 5 by 20.8. Georgia: 8 by 38.3. LSU: 5 by 20.8. Ole Miss: 8 by 33.3. Mississippi State: 3 by 12.5. Arkansas: 2 by 8.3. New Mexico State: 2 by 18.3. Alabama: 5 by 20.8
Split Comparison
Wins0.3 · n=3 · +0.1 vs Losses
Losses0.2 · n=7 · -0.1 vs Wins
First Half0.3 · n=6 · +0.0 vs Second Half
Second Half0.2 · n=5 · -0.0 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
11 games
Featured metric
Havoc Plays
Top game by takeover score
California
Best efficiency game
38.3 vs Georgia
| Result | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 12/30 | @ Maryland | L 13-31 | 2 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/25 | vs Alabama | L 24-27 | 5 | 4 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/18 | vs New Mexico State | L 10-31 | 2 | 2 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/11 | @ Arkansas | W 48-10 | 2 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/28 | vs Mississippi State | W 27-13 | 3 | 3 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/21 | vs Ole Miss | L 21-28 | 8 | 4 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/14 | @ LSU | L 18-48 | 5 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/30 | vs Georgia | L 20-27 | 8 | 5 | — | 0.50 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/23 | @ Texas A&M | L 10-27 | 5 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/16 | vs Unknown | — | 5 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sun 9/10 | @ California | W 14-10 | 5 | 4 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
North Texas
2018-2022
Opening stop
- 2
Auburn
2023
Final stop
Season Progression
201820192020202020212021202220232023
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2018 Regular Season | North Texas | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 2019 Regular Season | North Texas | 1 | 11.6 | 1.8 | 1 |
| 2020 Postseason | North Texas | 9.5 | 35.1 | 13 | 8.5 |
| 2020 Regular Season | North Texas | 9.5 | 35.1 | 13 | 0 |
| 2021 Postseason | North Texas | 5 | 31 | 6.2 | -4.5 |
| 2021 Regular Season | North Texas | 5 | 31 | 6.2 | 0 |
| 2022 Regular Season | North Texas | 2 | 30.5 | 5.9 | -3 |
| 2023 Postseason | Auburn | 2.5 | 21.2 | 5.7 | 0.5 |
| 2023 Regular Season | Auburn | 2.5 | 21.2 | 5.7 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
SMU
Loss with 3 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
3
Primary metric
3 disruption/tackle impact with 60 takeover score.
#2
Unknown
1
Primary metric
Game with 1 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
1 disruption/tackle impact with 58.8 takeover score.
#3
Florida International
2
Primary metric
Win with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 55 takeover score.
#4
Liberty
2
Primary metric
Loss with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 51.1 takeover score.
#5
Middle Tennessee
2
Primary metric
Win with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 47.6 takeover score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2018 Regular Season · North Texas
0 primary output · 0 efficiency · 0 usage
33.3
#2
2020 Postseason · North Texas
22.9
9.5 primary · 35.1 efficiency · 13 usage
#3
2020 Regular Season · North Texas
22.9
9.5 primary · 35.1 efficiency · 13 usage
Milestones
1
Impact games
1
Splash games
7
10+ tackle games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
2★
Class 2018 · Rating 0.7964
Richland · North Richland Hills, TX
- Committed To
- North Texas
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2018
Career Facts
2
Career teams
9
Seasons tracked
277
Career Tackles
Data Context
Coverage spans 9 tracked seasons, 51 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.