Usage Score
12.9
Player Dossier
2018-2022Louisville
Yasir Abdullah
LB • 6'1" • 242 lbs • Miramar, FL, USA
Ball-hunting defenderSplash play profile
Yasir Abdullah shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 40.8 disruption score.
Efficiency
40.8
Consistency
54.6
Season Value
40
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2021 Postseason · Louisville
1819192021212222
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 8
- Program Path
- Louisville
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Pittsburgh
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Yasir Abdullah, LB. Best season Best season by value score: 2021 Postseason · Louisville. Yasir Abdullah shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 40.8 disruption score.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2021 Postseason
Louisville paired 30.5 primary output with 42.6 efficiency.
Supporting note
2022 Postseason role shape
impact-led usage with 40.8 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2022 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Pittsburgh
Win with 6 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2022 Postseason · Louisville
Games
13
Havoc Plays / G
2.3
Efficiency
40.8
Usage
12.9
Consistency
54.6
Best Game by takeover score
Cincinnati
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
12345678910111213
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Cincinnati: 3. Syracuse: 1. UCF: 1. Florida State: 4.5. South Florida: 3. Boston College: 0. Virginia: 2. Pittsburgh: 6. Wake Forest: 2. James Madison: 0. Clemson: 2. NC State: 5.5. Kentucky: 0
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Cincinnati: 2 by 38.3. Syracuse: 2 by 18.3. UCF: 4 by 26.7. Florida State: 8 by 78.3. South Florida: 5 by 50.8. Boston College: 2 by 8.3. Virginia: 1 by 24.2. Pittsburgh: 7 by 79.2. Wake Forest: 7 by 49.2. James Madison: 4 by 16.7. Clemson: 6 by 45. NC State: 7 by 79.2. Kentucky: 4 by 16.7
Split Comparison
Wins2.8 · n=8 · +1.3 vs Losses
Losses1.5 · n=5 · -1.3 vs Wins
First Half2.1 · n=7 · -0.5 vs Second Half
Second Half2.6 · n=6 · +0.5 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
13 games
Featured metric
Havoc Plays
Top game by takeover score
Pittsburgh
Best efficiency game
79.2 vs NC State
| Result | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 12/17 | vs Cincinnati | W 24-7 | 2 | 1 | — | 1.50 | 1.50 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/26 | @ Kentucky | L 13-26 | 4 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/19 | vs NC State2+ sacks · Splash game | W 25-10 | 7 | 3 | — | 3 | 2.50 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/12 | @ Clemson | L 16-31 | 6 | 4 | — | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/5 | vs James Madison | W 34-10 | 4 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/29 | vs Wake Forest | W 48-21 | 7 | 6 | — | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sun 10/23 | vs PittsburghSplash game | W 24-10 | 7 | 4 | — | 2 | 1 | 1 | 2 | — | — |
| Sat 10/8 | @ Virginia | W 34-17 | 1 | 1 | — | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/1 | @ Boston College | L 33-34 | 2 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/24 | vs South Florida | W 41-3 | 5 | 2 | — | 1 | 1 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Fri 9/16 | vs Florida StateSplash game | L 31-35 | 8 | 3 | — | 2 | 0.50 | 1 | 1 | — | — |
| Fri 9/9 | @ UCF | W 20-14 | 4 | 3 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sun 9/4 | @ Syracuse | L 7-31 | 2 | 2 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Louisville
2018-2022
Opening stop
Season Progression
20182019201920202021202120222022
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2018 Regular Season | Louisville | 1 | 7.2 | 0.9 | — |
| 2019 Postseason | Louisville | 6 | 20.6 | 6.5 | 5 |
| 2019 Regular Season | Louisville | 6 | 20.6 | 6.5 | 0 |
| 2020 Regular Season | Louisville | 10 | 29.7 | 10.8 | 4 |
| 2021 Postseason | Louisville | 30.5 | 42.6 | 15.1 | 20.5 |
| 2021 Regular Season | Louisville | 30.5 | 42.6 | 15.1 | 0 |
| 2022 Postseason | Louisville | 30 | 40.8 | 12.9 | -0.5 |
| 2022 Regular Season | Louisville | 30 | 40.8 | 12.9 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Pittsburgh
Win with 6 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
6
Primary metric
6 disruption/tackle impact with 69.9 takeover score.
#2
Florida State
5.5
Primary metric
Win with backfield disruption leading the way.
5.5 disruption/tackle impact with 68.4 takeover score.
#3
NC State
5.5
Primary metric
Win with backfield disruption leading the way.
5.5 disruption/tackle impact with 67 takeover score.
#4
Air Force
4
Primary metric
Loss with 4 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
4 disruption/tackle impact with 63.5 takeover score.
#5
Syracuse
4.5
Primary metric
Win with backfield disruption leading the way.
4.5 disruption/tackle impact with 62.8 takeover score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2021 Postseason · Louisville
30.5 primary output · 42.6 efficiency · 15.1 usage
42.8
#2
2021 Regular Season · Louisville
42.8
30.5 primary · 42.6 efficiency · 15.1 usage
#3
2022 Postseason · Louisville
40
30 primary · 40.8 efficiency · 12.9 usage
Milestones
5
Impact games
11
Splash games
1
10+ tackle games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
3★
Class 2018 · Rating 0.8602
Miami Carol City · Opa Locka, FL
- Committed To
- Louisville
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2018
Career Facts
1
Career teams
8
Seasons tracked
206
Career Tackles
Data Context
Coverage spans 8 tracked seasons, 52 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.