Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2023 Postseason
Arizona paired 24 primary output with 28.4 efficiency.
Player Stats
Taylor Upshaw College Stats
Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.
Stat Footprint
Career production snapshot
- Tackles
- 68
- TFL
- 21.5
- Sacks
- 14
- QB hurries
- 9
- Passes defended
- 1
Season Ledger
Crawlable season-by-season stats
| Season | Team | Games | Tackles | TFL | Sacks | QB Hur | PD | TD | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2018 Regular Season | Michigan | 0 | 0 | - | 0 | - | - | 0 | - |
| 2019 Regular Season | Michigan | 2 | 2 | - | 0 | - | - | 0 | 37.2 |
| 2020 Regular Season | Michigan | 5 | 16 | 2 | 1 | 2 | - | 0 | 34.2 |
| 2021 Regular Season | Michigan | 4 | 7 | 3.5 | 2.5 | 3 | - | 0 | 53.8 |
| 2022 Regular Season | Michigan | 11 | 12 | 4.5 | 2 | 1 | - | 0 | 39.4 |
| 2023 Postseason | Arizona | 13 | 1 | - | 0 | 1 | - | 0 | 68.4 |
| 2023 Regular Season | Arizona | 13 | 30 | 11.5 | 8.5 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 68.4 |
Player insights
Supporting note
2023 Postseason role shape
impact-led usage with 28.4 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2023 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Multi-stop career journey
Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across Michigan, Arizona.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Stanford
Win with backfield disruption leading the way. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2023 Postseason · Arizona
Games
13
Havoc Plays / G
1.8
Efficiency
28.4
Usage
9.5
Consistency
66.1
Best Game by takeover score
Stanford
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Game-by-Game Trend
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Oklahoma: 1. Northern Arizona: 2. Mississippi State: 0. UTEP: 2. Stanford: 4. Washington: 3. USC: 1. Washington State: 2. Oregon State: 2. UCLA: 3. Colorado: 0. Utah: 3. Arizona State: 1
Volume vs Efficiency
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Oklahoma: 1 by 14.2. Northern Arizona: 3 by 32.5. Mississippi State: 1 by 4.2. UTEP: 1 by 24.2. Stanford: 2 by 48.3. Washington: 2 by 38.3. USC: 1 by 14.2. Washington State: 2 by 28.3. Oregon State: 3 by 32.5. UCLA: 2 by 38.3. Colorado: 3 by 12.5. Utah: 7 by 59.2. Arizona State: 3 by 22.5
Split Comparison
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Wins2 · Games = 10 · +0.7 vs Losses
Losses1.3 · Games = 3 · -0.7 vs Wins
Next best actions
Keep exploring Taylor Upshaw
Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.