Usage Score
11.6
Player Dossier
2018-2023Arizona
LB • 6'5" • 270 lbs • Bradenton, FL, USA
Taylor Upshaw shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 26.1 disruption score.
Usage Score
11.6
Efficiency
26.1
Consistency
60.9
Season Value
41.6
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2023 Postseason · Arizona
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Taylor Upshaw, LB. Best season Best season by value score: 2023 Postseason · Arizona. Taylor Upshaw shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 26.1 disruption score.
Taylor Upshaw played LB for Michigan and Arizona. Across 6 tracked seasons, Taylor Upshaw recorded 68 tackles. His top tracked season came in 2023 with Arizona.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2023 Postseason
Arizona paired 21 primary output with 26.1 efficiency.
Supporting note
2023 Postseason role shape
impact-led usage with 26.1 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2023 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Multi-stop career journey
Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across Michigan, Arizona.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Stanford
Win with backfield disruption leading the way. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
13
Havoc Plays / G
1.6
Efficiency
26.1
Usage
11.6
Consistency
60.9
Best Game by takeover score
Oklahoma
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Oklahoma: 0. Unknown: 2. Mississippi State: 0. UTEP: 2. Stanford: 4. Washington: 2. USC: 0. Washington State: 2. Oregon State: 2. UCLA: 3. Colorado: 0. Utah: 3. Arizona State: 1
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Oklahoma: 1 by 4.2. Unknown: 3 by 32.5. Mississippi State: 1 by 4.2. UTEP: 1 by 24.2. Stanford: 2 by 48.3. Washington: 2 by 28.3. USC: 1 by 4.2. Washington State: 2 by 28.3. Oregon State: 3 by 32.5. UCLA: 2 by 38.3. Colorado: 3 by 12.5. Utah: 7 by 59.2. Arizona State: 3 by 22.5
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
13 games
Featured metric
Havoc Plays
Top game by takeover score
Stanford
Best efficiency game
59.2 vs Utah
| Result | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fri 12/29 | @ Oklahoma | W 38-24 | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/25 | @ Arizona State | W 59-23 | 3 | 3 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/18 | vs UtahSplash game | W 42-18 | 7 | 4 | — | 2 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/11 | @ Colorado | W 34-31 | 3 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sun 11/5 | vs UCLA | W 27-10 | 2 | 1 | — | 1 | 1 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sun 10/29 | vs Oregon State | W 27-24 | 3 | 1 | — | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/14 | @ Washington State | W 44-6 | 2 | 1 | — | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sun 10/8 | @ USC | L 41-43 | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sun 10/1 | vs Washington | L 24-31 | 2 | 1 | — | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/23 | @ Stanford2+ sacks · Splash game | W 21-20 | 2 | 2 | — | 2 | 2 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sun 9/17 | vs UTEP | W 31-10 | 1 | 1 | — | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/9 | @ Mississippi State | L 24-31 | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sun 9/3 | vs Unknown | — | 3 | 1 | — | 1.50 | 0.50 | — | 0 | — | — |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Michigan
2018-2022
Opening stop
Arizona
2023
Final stop
Season Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2018 Regular Season | Michigan | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2019 Regular Season | Michigan | 0 | 4.2 | 0.9 | 0 |
| 2020 Regular Season | Michigan | 3 | 19.3 | 12.2 | 3 |
| 2021 Regular Season | Michigan | 6 | 22.3 | 12 | 3 |
| 2022 Regular Season | Michigan | 7.5 | 11.4 | 8.2 | 1.5 |
| 2023 Postseason | Arizona | 21 | 26.1 | 11.6 | 13.5 |
| 2023 Regular Season | Arizona | 21 | 26.1 | 11.6 | 0 |
#1 Featured game
Indiana
Win with 3 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
3
Primary metric
3 disruption/tackle impact with 58.3 takeover score.
#2
Penn State
2
Primary metric
Loss with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 55.9 takeover score.
#3
Stanford
4
Primary metric
Win with backfield disruption leading the way.
4 disruption/tackle impact with 54.2 takeover score.
#4
Utah
3
Primary metric
Win with 3 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
3 disruption/tackle impact with 51.2 takeover score.
#5
Iowa
2
Primary metric
Win with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 46.7 takeover score.
#1 Season by value score
2023 Postseason · Arizona
21 primary output · 26.1 efficiency · 11.6 usage
41.6
#2
2023 Regular Season · Arizona
41.6
21 primary · 26.1 efficiency · 11.6 usage
#3
2019 Regular Season · Michigan
35
0 primary · 4.2 efficiency · 0.9 usage
0
Impact games
3
Splash games
0
10+ tackle games
Recruit Profile
Class 2018 · Rating 0.8742
Braden River · Bradenton, FL
Career Facts
2
Career teams
7
Seasons tracked
68
Career Tackles
Data Context
Coverage spans 7 tracked seasons, 35 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.