Usage Score
6.2
Player Dossier
2018-2023Duke
Jeremiah Lewis
S • 5'11" • 197 lbs • Plano, TX, USA
Ball-hunting defenderSplash play profile
Jeremiah Lewis shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 30.1 disruption score.
Efficiency
30.1
Consistency
52.2
Season Value
25.7
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2018 Postseason · Duke
18192021222323
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 2
- Seasons Tracked
- 7
- Program Path
- Duke • Northwestern
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Virginia Tech
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Jeremiah Lewis, S. Best season Best season by value score: 2018 Postseason · Duke. Jeremiah Lewis shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 30.1 disruption score.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2018 Postseason
Duke paired 0 primary output with 4.2 efficiency.
Supporting note
2023 Postseason role shape
impact-led usage with 30.1 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2023 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Multi-stop career journey
Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across Duke, Northwestern.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Pittsburgh
Win with 4 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2023 Postseason · Duke
Games
9
Havoc Plays / G
1.1
Efficiency
30.1
Usage
6.2
Consistency
52.2
Best Game by takeover score
Troy
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Game-by-Game Trend
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Troy: 1. Clemson: 1. Northwestern: 0. Notre Dame: 1. Florida State: 0. Louisville: 0. North Carolina: 1. Virginia: 2. Pittsburgh: 4
Volume vs Efficiency
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Troy: 2 by 18.3. Clemson: 0 by 10. Northwestern: 1 by 4.2. Notre Dame: 10 by 51.7. Florida State: 3 by 12.5. Louisville: 2 by 8.3. North Carolina: 7 by 39.2. Virginia: 10 by 61.7. Pittsburgh: 6 by 65
Split Comparison
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Wins1.5 · Games = 4 · +0.7 vs Losses
Losses0.8 · Games = 5 · -0.7 vs Wins
First Half0.6 · Games = 5 · -1.1 vs Second Half
Second Half1.8 · Games = 4 · +1.1 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
9 games
Featured metric
Havoc Plays
Top game by takeover score
Pittsburgh
Best efficiency game
65 vs Pittsburgh
| Result | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 12/23 | vs Troy | W 17-10 | 2 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/25 | vs PittsburghSplash game | W 30-19 | 6 | 2 | — | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | — | — |
| Sat 11/18 | @ Virginia10+ tackles · Splash game | L 27-30 | 10 | 6 | — | 2 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sun 11/12 | @ North Carolina | L 45-47 | 7 | 4 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/28 | @ Louisville | L 0-23 | 2 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/21 | @ Florida State | L 20-38 | 3 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/30 | vs Notre Dame10+ tackles | L 14-21 | 10 | 3 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 9/16 | vs Northwestern | W 38-14 | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Tue 9/5 | vs Clemson | W 28-7 | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Duke
2018-2023
Opening stop
- 2
Northwestern
2022
Final stop
Season Progression
2018201920202021202220232023
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2018 Postseason | Duke | 0 | 4.2 | 0.7 | — |
| 2019 Regular Season | Duke | 1 | 9.8 | 1.2 | 1 |
| 2020 Regular Season | Duke | 12.5 | 30.8 | 6.4 | 11.5 |
| 2021 Regular Season | Duke | 4 | 16.5 | 4.3 | -8.5 |
| 2022 Regular Season | Northwestern | 7 | 30.1 | 5.9 | 3 |
| 2023 Postseason | Duke | 10 | 30.1 | 6.2 | 3 |
| 2023 Regular Season | Duke | 10 | 30.1 | 6.2 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Virginia Tech
Loss with 3.5 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
3.5
Primary metric
3.5 disruption/tackle impact with 59.4 takeover score.
#2
Pittsburgh
4
Primary metric
Win with 4 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
4 disruption/tackle impact with 58.6 takeover score.
#3
Duke
2
Primary metric
Loss with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 51.8 takeover score.
#4
Iowa
1.5
Primary metric
Loss with 1.5 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
1.5 disruption/tackle impact with 46.7 takeover score.
#5
Northwestern
2
Primary metric
Win with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 43.5 takeover score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2018 Postseason · Duke
0 primary output · 4.2 efficiency · 0.7 usage
35
#2
2020 Regular Season · Duke
26.7
12.5 primary · 30.8 efficiency · 6.4 usage
#3
2023 Postseason · Duke
25.7
10 primary · 30.1 efficiency · 6.2 usage
Milestones
0
Impact games
2
Splash games
2
10+ tackle games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
3★
Class 2018 · Rating 0.8558
Prestonwood Christian · Plano, TX
- Committed To
- Duke
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2018
Career Facts
2
Career teams
7
Seasons tracked
193
Career Tackles
Data Context
Coverage spans 7 tracked seasons, 46 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.