Usage Score
20.6
Player Dossier
2017-2021Missouri
Alec Pierce
WR • 6'3" • 213 lbs • Visalia, CA, USA
Vertical playmakerExplosive finisher
Alec Pierce reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
88.8
Consistency
48.1
Season Value
64.4
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2018 Postseason · Cincinnati
171818191920202121
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 2
- Seasons Tracked
- 9
- Program Path
- Missouri • Cincinnati
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: East Carolina
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Alec Pierce, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2018 Postseason · Cincinnati. Alec Pierce reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2018 Postseason
Cincinnati paired 0 primary output with — efficiency.
Supporting note
2021 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 88.8 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2021 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Multi-stop career journey
Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across Missouri, Cincinnati.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: East Carolina
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 92.9th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2021 Postseason · Cincinnati
Games
14
Receiving Yards / G
63.1
Efficiency
88.8
Usage
20.6
Consistency
48.1
Best Game by takeover score
Alabama
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
1234567891011121314
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Alabama: 17. Miami (OH): 29. Unknown: 35. Indiana: 86. Notre Dame: 144. Temple: 93. UCF: 19. Navy: 37. Tulane: 47. Tulsa: 113. South Florida: 24. SMU: 39. East Carolina: 136. Houston: 65
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Alabama: 2 by 56.7. Miami (OH): 2 by 96.7. Unknown: 2 by 100. Indiana: 5 by 100. Notre Dame: 6 by 100. Temple: 6 by 100. UCF: 1 by 100. Navy: 5 by 49.3. Tulane: 2 by 100. Tulsa: 5 by 100. South Florida: 3 by 53.3. SMU: 3 by 86.7. East Carolina: 8 by 100. Houston: 2 by 100
Split Comparison
Wins69.3 · n=12
First Half60.4 · n=7 · -5.4 vs Second Half
Second Half65.9 · n=7 · +5.4 vs First Half
All Games63.1 · n=14
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
14 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
East Carolina
Best efficiency game
100 vs Houston
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fri 12/31 | @ Alabama | L 6-27 | — | 2 | 17 | 8.5 | 8.50 | 0 | 12 |
| Sat 12/4 | vs Houston | W 35-20 | — | 2 | 65 | 32.5 | 32.50 | 1 | 44 |
| Fri 11/26 | @ East Carolina100 receiving yards · High volume | W 35-13 | — | 8 | 136 | 17 | 17 | 1 | 53 |
| Sat 11/20 | vs SMU2+ TD | W 48-14 | — | 3 | 39 | 13 | 13 | 2 | 17 |
| Fri 11/12 | @ South Florida | W 45-28 | — | 3 | 24 | 8 | 8 | 0 | 12 |
| Sat 11/6 | vs Tulsa100 receiving yards | W 28-20 | — | 5 | 113 | 22.6 | 22.60 | 1 | 40 |
| Sat 10/30 | @ Tulane | W 31-12 | — | 2 | 47 | 23.5 | 23.50 | 0 | 38 |
| Sat 10/23 | @ Navy | W 27-20 | — | 5 | 37 | 7.4 | 7.40 | 0 | 11 |
| Sat 10/16 | vs UCF | W 56-21 | — | 1 | 19 | 19 | 19 | 1 | 19 |
| Fri 10/8 | vs Temple | W 52-3 | — | 6 | 93 | 15.5 | 15.50 | 1 | 33 |
| Sat 10/2 | @ Notre Dame100 receiving yards | W 24-13 | — | 6 | 144 | 24 | 24 | 0 | 45 |
| Sat 9/18 | @ Indiana | W 38-24 | — | 5 | 86 | 17.2 | 17.20 | 1 | 28 |
| Sat 9/11 | vs Unknown | — | — | 2 | 35 | 17.5 | 17.50 | 0 | 19 |
| Sat 9/4 | vs Miami (OH) | W 49-14 | — | 2 | 29 | 14.5 | 14.50 | 0 | 19 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Missouri
2017
Opening stop
- 2
Cincinnati
2018-2021
Final stop
Season Progression
201720182018201920192020202020212021
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2017 Regular Season | Missouri | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2018 Postseason | Cincinnati | 0 | — | — | 0 |
| 2018 Regular Season | Cincinnati | 0 | — | — | 0 |
| 2019 Postseason | Cincinnati | 652 | 85.1 | 20.5 | 652 |
| 2019 Regular Season | Cincinnati | 652 | 85.1 | 20.5 | 0 |
| 2020 Postseason | Cincinnati | 315 | 78.5 | 14.9 | -337 |
| 2020 Regular Season | Cincinnati | 315 | 78.5 | 14.9 | 0 |
| 2021 Postseason | Cincinnati | 884 | 88.8 | 20.6 | 569 |
| 2021 Regular Season | Cincinnati | 884 | 88.8 | 20.6 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
East Carolina
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
136
Primary metric
136 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Notre Dame
144
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
144 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Marshall
108
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
108 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
Tulsa
146
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
146 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
Ohio State
93
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
93 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2018 Postseason · Cincinnati
0 primary output · — efficiency · — usage
100
#2
2018 Regular Season · Cincinnati
100
0 primary · — efficiency · — usage
#3
2021 Postseason · Cincinnati
64.4
884 primary · 88.8 efficiency · 20.6 usage
Milestones
5
100+ receiving yards
1
8+ catch outings
1
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
3★
Class 2018 · Rating 0.8466
Glenbard West · Glen Ellyn, IL
- Committed To
- Cincinnati
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2018
Career Facts
2
Career teams
9
Seasons tracked
1,851
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 9 tracked seasons, 36 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.