Usage Score
12.2
Player Dossier
2017-2018UAB
LB • 6'3" • 235 lbs • Houston, TX, USA
Tre' Crawford shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 33.8 disruption score.
Usage Score
12.2
Efficiency
33.8
Consistency
39.3
Season Value
46.3
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by Season Value: 2018 Postseason · UAB
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Tre' Crawford, LB. Best season Best season by Season Value: 2018 Postseason · UAB. Tre' Crawford shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 33.8 disruption score.
Tre' Crawford played LB for UAB. Across 2 tracked seasons, Tre' Crawford recorded 47 tackles. His top tracked season came in 2018 with UAB.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2018 Postseason
UAB paired 26.5 primary output with 33.8 efficiency.
Supporting note
2018 Postseason role shape
impact-led usage with 33.8 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2018 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Southern Miss
Win with backfield disruption leading the way. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
12
Havoc Plays / G
2.2
Efficiency
33.8
Usage
12.2
Consistency
39.3
Best Game by takeover score
Southern Miss
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Northern Illinois: 0.5. Savannah St: 1. Coastal Carolina: 0. Tulane: 1. Charlotte: 3. Louisiana Tech: 2. Rice: 4. UTSA: 0. Southern Miss: 8.5. Texas A&M: 0. Middle Tennessee: 3. Middle Tennessee: 3.5
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Northern Illinois: 4 by 21.7. Savannah St: 3 by 22.5. Coastal Carolina: 2 by 8.3. Tulane: 1 by 14.2. Charlotte: 3 by 42.5. Louisiana Tech: 7 by 49.2. Rice: 3 by 52.5. UTSA: 1 by 4.2. Southern Miss: 4 by 66.7. Texas A&M: 4 by 16.7. Middle Tennessee: 5 by 50.8. Middle Tennessee: 5 by 55.8
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
12 games
Featured metric
Havoc Plays
Top game by takeover score
Southern Miss
Best efficiency game
66.7 vs Southern Miss
| Result | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wed 12/19 | @ Northern Illinois | W 37-13 | 4 | 2 | — | 0.50 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 12/1 | @ Middle TennesseeSplash game | W 27-25 | 5 | 4 | — | 1.50 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/24 | @ Middle TennesseeSplash game | L 3-27 | 5 | 4 | — | 2 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sun 11/18 | @ Texas A&M | L 20-41 | 4 | 3 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sun 11/11 | vs Southern Miss2+ sacks · Splash game | W 26-23 | 4 | 3 | — | 3.50 | 3 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/3 | vs UTSA | W 52-3 | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/13 | @ RiceSplash game | W 42-0 | 3 | 3 | — | 2 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/6 | @ Louisiana TechSplash game | W 28-7 | 7 | 6 | — | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/29 | vs CharlotteSplash game | W 28-7 | 3 | 3 | — | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/15 | vs Tulane | W 31-24 | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/8 | @ Coastal Carolina | L 24-47 | 2 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Fri 8/31 | vs Savannah St | W 52-0 | 3 | 2 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
UAB
2017-2018
Opening stop
Season Value Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2017 Regular Season | UAB | 0 | 5.2 | 0.9 | — |
| 2018 Postseason | UAB | 26.5 | 33.8 | 12.2 | 26.5 |
| 2018 Regular Season | UAB | 26.5 | 33.8 | 12.2 | 0 |
#1 Featured game
Southern Miss
Win with backfield disruption leading the way.
8.5
Primary metric
8.5 disruption/tackle impact with 61.8 takeover score.
#2
Rice
4
Primary metric
Win with 4 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
4 disruption/tackle impact with 38.9 takeover score.
#3
Middle Tennessee
3.5
Primary metric
Win with 3.5 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
3.5 disruption/tackle impact with 38.6 takeover score.
#4
Middle Tennessee
3
Primary metric
Loss with 3 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
3 disruption/tackle impact with 35.2 takeover score.
#5
Charlotte
3
Primary metric
Win with 3 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
3 disruption/tackle impact with 30.8 takeover score.
#1 Season by Season Value
2018 Postseason · UAB
26.5 primary output · 33.8 efficiency · 12.2 usage
46.3
#2
2018 Regular Season · UAB
46.3
26.5 primary · 33.8 efficiency · 12.2 usage
#3
2017 Regular Season · UAB
35.4
0 primary · 5.2 efficiency · 0.9 usage
1
Impact games
6
Splash games
0
10+ tackle games
Career Facts
1
Career teams
3
Seasons tracked
47
Career Tackles
Data Context
Coverage spans 3 tracked seasons, 16 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Next best actions
Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.