Usage Score
12.6
Player Dossier
2018-2022Purdue
QB • 6'3" • 210 lbs • Lincolnshire, IL, USA
Aidan O'Connell is a balanced quarterback profile with 12.6 usage in the latest tracked season.
Usage Score
12.6
Efficiency
60.4
Consistency
78.7
Season Value
61.6
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by Season Value: 2022 Regular Season · Purdue
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Aidan O'Connell, QB. Best season Best season by Season Value: 2022 Regular Season · Purdue. Aidan O'Connell is a balanced quarterback profile with 12.6 usage in the latest tracked season.
Aidan O'Connell played QB for Purdue. Across 5 tracked seasons, Aidan O'Connell recorded 9,208 passing yards, -274 rushing yards, and 1 tackles. His top tracked season came in 2022 with Purdue.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2022 Regular Season
Purdue paired 3,400 primary output with 60.4 efficiency.
Supporting note
2022 Regular Season role shape
pass-led usage with 60.4 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2022 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Indiana State
Win with 211 yards of offense and 94 efficiency. It landed in the 33.3th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
12
Primary Metric / G
283.3
Efficiency
60.4
Usage
12.6
Consistency
78.7
Best Game by takeover score
Indiana State
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Penn State: 339. Indiana State: 211. Syracuse: 431. Minnesota: 209. Maryland: 335. Nebraska: 394. Wisconsin: 300. Iowa: 142. Illinois: 270. Northwestern: 155. Indiana: 284. Michigan: 330
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Penn State: 60 by 50.3. Indiana State: 19 by 94. Syracuse: 56 by 74.5. Minnesota: 44 by 53.5. Maryland: 50 by 59.1. Nebraska: 56 by 58.2. Wisconsin: 50 by 49.8. Iowa: 47 by 40.1. Illinois: 42 by 75.5. Northwestern: 29 by 54.3. Indiana: 34 by 61.4. Michigan: 53 by 54
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
12 games
Featured metric
Total Offense
Top game by takeover score
Indiana State
Best efficiency game
94 vs Indiana State
| Result | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sun 12/4 | @ Michigan300-yard game | L 22-43 | 32 | 47 | 366 | 68.1 | 0 | 2 | 54 | 6 | -36 | -6 | 0 | 0 |
| Sat 11/26 | @ Indiana | W 30-16 | 18 | 29 | 290 | 62.1 | 2 | 0 | 61.4 | 5 | -6 | -1.20 | 0 | 10 |
| Sat 11/19 | vs Northwestern | W 17-9 | 16 | 25 | 159 | 64.0 | 2 | 0 | 54.3 | 4 | -4 | -1 | 0 | 3 |
| Sat 11/12 | @ Illinois3+ TD | W 31-24 | 25 | 40 | 237 | 62.5 | 3 | 1 | 75.5 | 2 | 33 | 16.50 | 0 | 24 |
| Sat 11/5 | vs Iowa | L 3-24 | 20 | 43 | 168 | 46.5 | 0 | 2 | 40.1 | 4 | -26 | -6.50 | 0 | 3 |
| Sat 10/22 | @ Wisconsin300-yard game | L 24-35 | 31 | 46 | 320 | 67.4 | 1 | 3 | 49.8 | 4 | -20 | -5 | 1 | 1 |
| Sat 10/15 | vs Nebraska300-yard game · 3+ TD | W 43-37 | 35 | 54 | 391 | 64.8 | 4 | 1 | 58.2 | 2 | 3 | 1.50 | 0 | 3 |
| Sat 10/8 | @ Maryland300-yard game | W 31-29 | 30 | 41 | 360 | 73.2 | 2 | 1 | 59.1 | 9 | -25 | -2.80 | 0 | 3 |
| Sat 10/1 | @ Minnesota | W 20-10 | 27 | 40 | 199 | 67.5 | 0 | 2 | 53.5 | 4 | 10 | 2.50 | 0 | 9 |
| Sat 9/17 | @ Syracuse300-yard game · 3+ TD | L 29-32 | 39 | 55 | 424 | 70.9 | 3 | 1 | 74.5 | 1 | 7 | 7 | 0 | 7 |
| Sat 9/10 | vs Indiana State3+ TD | W 56-0 | 17 | 19 | 211 | 89.5 | 4 | 0 | 94 | — | — | — | — | — |
| Fri 9/2 | vs Penn State300-yard game | L 31-35 | 29 | 58 | 356 | 50.0 | 1 | 0 | 50.3 | 2 | -17 | -8.50 | 0 | 0 |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Purdue
2018-2022
Opening stop
Season Value Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2018 Regular Season | Purdue | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2019 Regular Season | Purdue | 1,090 | 59.5 | 12.6 | 1,090 |
| 2020 Regular Season | Purdue | 852 | 55.2 | 17.9 | -238 |
| 2021 Postseason | Purdue | 3,592 | 62.1 | 8.5 | 2,740 |
| 2021 Regular Season | Purdue | 3,592 | 62.1 | 8.5 | 0 |
| 2022 Regular Season | Purdue | 3,400 | 60.4 | 12.6 | -192 |
#1 Featured game
Ohio State
Loss with 390 yards of offense and 79.8 efficiency.
390
Primary metric
390 total offense with 79.8 efficiency.
#2
Indiana State
211
Primary metric
Win with 211 yards of offense and 94 efficiency.
211 total offense with 94 efficiency.
#3
Illinois
350
Primary metric
Win with 350 yards of offense and 67.8 efficiency.
350 total offense with 67.8 efficiency.
#4
Syracuse
431
Primary metric
Loss with 431 yards of offense and 74.5 efficiency.
431 total offense with 74.5 efficiency.
#5
Michigan State
523
Primary metric
Win with 523 yards of offense and 64.2 efficiency.
523 total offense with 64.2 efficiency.
#1 Season by Season Value
2022 Regular Season · Purdue
3,400 primary output · 60.4 efficiency · 12.6 usage
61.6
#2
2021 Postseason · Purdue
60.1
3,592 primary · 62.1 efficiency · 8.5 usage
#3
2021 Regular Season · Purdue
60.1
3,592 primary · 62.1 efficiency · 8.5 usage
20
250+ passing yards
14
300+ total offense
12
3+ TD games
14
Above avg efficiency
Career Facts
1
Career teams
6
Seasons tracked
8,934
Career Total Offense
Data Context
Coverage spans 6 tracked seasons, 33 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Next best actions
Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.