Usage Score
10.8
Player Dossier
2017-2022Ole Miss
Momo Sanogo
LB • 6'1" • 235 lbs • Plano, TX, USA
Ball-hunting defenderSplash play profile
Momo Sanogo shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 37.7 disruption score.
Efficiency
37.7
Consistency
30.9
Season Value
22.9
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2019 Regular Season · Ole Miss
1718192020212222
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 2
- Seasons Tracked
- 8
- Program Path
- Ole Miss • Louisville
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Clemson
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Momo Sanogo, LB. Best season Best season by value score: 2019 Regular Season · Ole Miss. Momo Sanogo shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 37.7 disruption score.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2019 Regular Season
Ole Miss paired 0 primary output with 16.7 efficiency.
Supporting note
2022 Postseason role shape
impact-led usage with 37.7 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2022 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Multi-stop career journey
Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across Ole Miss, Louisville.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Clemson
Loss with 3 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2022 Postseason · Louisville
Games
13
Havoc Plays / G
1.1
Efficiency
37.7
Usage
10.8
Consistency
30.9
Best Game by takeover score
Cincinnati
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
12345678910111213
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Cincinnati: 2. Syracuse: 1.5. UCF: 1. Florida State: 0. South Florida: 0. Boston College: 3. Virginia: 0.5. Pittsburgh: 0. Wake Forest: 2.5. James Madison: 0.5. Clemson: 3. NC State: 0. Kentucky: 0
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Cincinnati: 1 by 24.2. Syracuse: 6 by 40. UCF: 6 by 35. Florida State: 6 by 25. South Florida: 3 by 12.5. Boston College: 6 by 55. Virginia: 4 by 21.7. Pittsburgh: 7 by 29.2. Wake Forest: 9 by 62.5. James Madison: 13 by 55. Clemson: 14 by 80. NC State: 5 by 20.8. Kentucky: 7 by 29.2
Split Comparison
Wins0.8 · n=8 · -0.7 vs Losses
Losses1.5 · n=5 · +0.7 vs Wins
First Half1.1 · n=7 · +0.1 vs Second Half
Second Half1 · n=6 · -0.1 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
13 games
Featured metric
Havoc Plays
Top game by takeover score
Clemson
Best efficiency game
80 vs Clemson
| Result | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 12/17 | vs Cincinnati | W 24-7 | 1 | 1 | — | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/26 | @ Kentucky | L 13-26 | 7 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/19 | vs NC State | W 25-10 | 5 | 3 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/12 | @ Clemson10+ tackles · Splash game | L 16-31 | 14 | 10 | — | 2 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/5 | vs James Madison10+ tackles | W 34-10 | 13 | 5 | — | 0.50 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/29 | vs Wake Forest | W 48-21 | 9 | 4 | — | 1.50 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sun 10/23 | vs Pittsburgh | W 24-10 | 7 | 3 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/8 | @ Virginia | W 34-17 | 4 | 1 | — | 0.50 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/1 | @ Boston CollegeSplash game | L 33-34 | 6 | 5 | — | 2 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/24 | vs South Florida | W 41-3 | 3 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Fri 9/16 | vs Florida State | L 31-35 | 6 | 3 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Fri 9/9 | @ UCF | W 20-14 | 6 | 2 | — | 0.50 | 0.50 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sun 9/4 | @ Syracuse | L 7-31 | 6 | 5 | — | 1.50 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Ole Miss
2017-2021
Opening stop
- 2
Louisville
2022
Final stop
Season Progression
20172018201920202020202120222022
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2017 Regular Season | Ole Miss | 0 | 6.7 | 1 | — |
| 2018 Regular Season | Ole Miss | 8.5 | 43.2 | 9.4 | 8.5 |
| 2019 Regular Season | Ole Miss | 0 | 16.7 | 2.6 | -8.5 |
| 2020 Postseason | Ole Miss | 9 | 34 | 8.2 | 9 |
| 2020 Regular Season | Ole Miss | 9 | 34 | 8.2 | 0 |
| 2021 Regular Season | Ole Miss | 3 | 12.2 | 2.6 | -6 |
| 2022 Postseason | Louisville | 14 | 37.7 | 10.8 | 11 |
| 2022 Regular Season | Louisville | 14 | 37.7 | 10.8 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Clemson
Loss with 3 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
3
Primary metric
3 disruption/tackle impact with 68.3 takeover score.
#2
Vanderbilt
3
Primary metric
Loss with 3 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
3 disruption/tackle impact with 67.1 takeover score.
#3
Boston College
3
Primary metric
Loss with 3 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
3 disruption/tackle impact with 59.9 takeover score.
#4
Mississippi State
2.5
Primary metric
Win with 2.5 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2.5 disruption/tackle impact with 58.1 takeover score.
#5
Wake Forest
2.5
Primary metric
Win with 2.5 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2.5 disruption/tackle impact with 52.5 takeover score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2019 Regular Season · Ole Miss
0 primary output · 16.7 efficiency · 2.6 usage
39.8
#2
2017 Regular Season · Ole Miss
35.9
0 primary · 6.7 efficiency · 1 usage
#3
2020 Postseason · Ole Miss
26.8
9 primary · 34 efficiency · 8.2 usage
Milestones
2
Impact games
3
Splash games
8
10+ tackle games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
3★
Class 2017 · Rating 0.8842
Plano West · Plano, TX
- Committed To
- Ole Miss
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2017
Career Facts
2
Career teams
8
Seasons tracked
296
Career Tackles
Data Context
Coverage spans 8 tracked seasons, 52 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.