Usage Score
3.3
Player Dossier
2017-2021UTSA
De'Marco Guidry
LB • 6'0" • 220 lbs • La Marque, TX, USA
Ball-hunting defenderSplash play profile
De'Marco Guidry shows a ball-hunting defender profile with partial disruption data.
Efficiency
15.8
Consistency
11.1
Season Value
10.8
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2019 Regular Season · UTSA
171819202021
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 6
- Program Path
- UTSA
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: UAB
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
De'Marco Guidry, LB. Best season Best season by value score: 2019 Regular Season · UTSA. De'Marco Guidry shows a ball-hunting defender profile with partial disruption data.
De'Marco Guidry played LB for UTSA. Across 5 tracked seasons, De'Marco Guidry recorded 41 tackles. His top tracked season came in 2020 with UTSA.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2019 Regular Season
UTSA paired 0 primary output with 8.3 efficiency.
Supporting note
2020 Postseason role shape
impact-led usage with 15.8 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value cooled off
2021 Regular Season fell back from the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Middle Tennessee
Win with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2020 Postseason · UTSA
Games
9
Havoc Plays / G
0.3
Efficiency
15.8
Usage
3.3
Consistency
11.1
Best Game by takeover score
Louisiana
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Game-by-Game Trend
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Louisiana: 0. Texas State: 0.5. Middle Tennessee: 2. UAB: 0. BYU: 0. Army: 0. Louisiana Tech: 0. Florida Atlantic: 0.5. North Texas: 0
Volume vs Efficiency
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Louisiana: 5 by 20.8. Texas State: 4 by 21.7. Middle Tennessee: 2 by 28.3. UAB: 1 by 4.2. BYU: 2 by 8.3. Army: 2 by 8.3. Louisiana Tech: 3 by 12.5. Florida Atlantic: 5 by 25.8. North Texas: 3 by 12.5
Split Comparison
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Wins0.6 · Games = 4 · +0.5 vs Losses
Losses0.1 · Games = 5 · -0.5 vs Wins
First Half0.5 · Games = 5 · +0.4 vs Second Half
Second Half0.1 · Games = 4 · -0.4 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
9 games
Featured metric
Havoc Plays
Top game by takeover score
Middle Tennessee
Best efficiency game
28.3 vs Middle Tennessee
| Result | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 12/26 | vs Louisiana | L 24-31 | 5 | 3 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/28 | vs North Texas | W 49-17 | 3 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/31 | @ Florida Atlantic | L 3-24 | 5 | 1 | — | 0.50 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sun 10/25 | vs Louisiana Tech | W 27-26 | 3 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/17 | vs Army | L 16-28 | 2 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/10 | @ BYU | L 20-27 | 2 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/3 | @ UAB | L 13-21 | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/26 | vs Middle Tennessee | W 37-35 | 2 | 1 | — | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/12 | @ Texas State | W 51-48 | 4 | 2 | — | 0.50 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
UTSA
2017-2021
Opening stop
Season Progression
201720182019202020202021
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2017 Regular Season | UTSA | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 2018 Regular Season | UTSA | 1 | 8.7 | 6.2 | 1 |
| 2019 Regular Season | UTSA | 0 | 8.3 | 1.8 | -1 |
| 2020 Postseason | UTSA | 3 | 15.8 | 3.3 | 3 |
| 2020 Regular Season | UTSA | 3 | 15.8 | 3.3 | 0 |
| 2021 Regular Season | UTSA | 0 | — | — | -3 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
UAB
Loss with 1 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
1
Primary metric
1 disruption/tackle impact with 48.3 takeover score.
#2
Middle Tennessee
2
Primary metric
Win with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 45.9 takeover score.
#3
Florida Atlantic
0.5
Primary metric
Loss with 0.5 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
0.5 disruption/tackle impact with 18.4 takeover score.
#4
Texas State
0.5
Primary metric
Win with 0.5 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
0.5 disruption/tackle impact with 16.9 takeover score.
#5
Louisiana
0
Primary metric
Loss with 0 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
0 disruption/tackle impact with 8.1 takeover score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2019 Regular Season · UTSA
0 primary output · 8.3 efficiency · 1.8 usage
36.7
#2
2017 Regular Season · UTSA
33.3
0 primary · 0 efficiency · 0 usage
#3
2020 Postseason · UTSA
10.8
3 primary · 15.8 efficiency · 3.3 usage
Milestones
0
Impact games
0
Splash games
0
10+ tackle games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
3★
Class 2017 · Rating 0.8119
La Marque · La Marque, TX
- Committed To
- UTSA
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2017
Career Facts
1
Career teams
6
Seasons tracked
41
Career Tackles
Data Context
Coverage spans 6 tracked seasons, 18 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.