Usage Score
9.1
Player Dossier
2018-2022Tennessee
Princeton Fant
TE • 6'2" • 235 lbs • Nashville, TN, USA
Reliable chain-moverPossession profile
Princeton Fant reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
65.8
Consistency
57.2
Season Value
58
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by Season Value: 2022 Postseason · Tennessee
18192021212222
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 7
- Program Path
- Tennessee
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Purdue
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Princeton Fant, TE. Best season Best season by Season Value: 2022 Postseason · Tennessee. Princeton Fant reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Princeton Fant played TE for Tennessee. Across 5 tracked seasons, Princeton Fant recorded 66 passing yards, 24 rushing yards, and 570 receiving yards. His top tracked season came in 2022 with Tennessee.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2022 Postseason
Tennessee paired 241 primary output with 65.8 efficiency.
Supporting note
2022 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 65.8 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2022 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: South Carolina
Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2022 Postseason · Tennessee
Games
12
Receiving Yards / G
20.1
Efficiency
65.8
Usage
9.1
Consistency
57.2
Best Game by takeover score
South Carolina
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Game-by-Game Trend
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Clemson: 19. Pittsburgh: 8. Akron: 23. Florida: 43. LSU: 13. Alabama: 24. UT Martin: 17. Kentucky: 11. Georgia: 5. Missouri: 21. South Carolina: 57. Vanderbilt: 0
Volume vs Efficiency
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Clemson: 2 by 63.3. Pittsburgh: 1 by 53.3. Akron: 2 by 76.7. Florida: 5 by 57.3. LSU: 2 by 43.3. Alabama: 3 by 53.3. UT Martin: 1 by 100. Kentucky: 1 by 73.3. Georgia: 1 by 33.3. Missouri: 2 by 70. South Carolina: 2 by 100
Split Comparison
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Wins17.9 · Games = 10 · -13.1 vs Losses
Losses31 · Games = 2 · +13.1 vs Wins
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
12 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
South Carolina
Best efficiency game
100 vs South Carolina
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 12/31 | @ Clemson | W 31-14 | — | 2 | 19 | 9.5 | 9.50 | 0 | 15 |
| Sun 11/27 | @ Vanderbilt | W 56-0 | — | — | — | 0.5 | — | — | — |
| Sun 11/20 | @ South Carolina | L 38-63 | — | 2 | 57 | 28.5 | 28.50 | 1 | 41 |
| Sat 11/12 | vs Missouri2+ TD | W 66-24 | — | 2 | 21 | 10.5 | 10.50 | 2 | 19 |
| Sat 11/5 | @ Georgia | L 13-27 | — | 1 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 0 | 5 |
| Sat 10/29 | vs Kentucky | W 44-6 | — | 1 | 11 | 6.5 | 11 | 0 | 11 |
| Sat 10/22 | vs UT Martin | W 65-24 | — | 1 | 17 | 9.7 | 17 | 0 | 17 |
| Sat 10/15 | vs Alabama | W 52-49 | — | 3 | 24 | 6.5 | 8 | 0 | 9 |
| Sat 10/8 | @ LSU | W 40-13 | — | 2 | 13 | 6.5 | 6.50 | 0 | 8 |
| Sat 9/24 | vs Florida | W 38-33 | — | 5 | 43 | 8.6 | 8.60 | 0 | 16 |
| Sat 9/17 | vs Akron | W 63-6 | — | 2 | 23 | 11.5 | 11.50 | 0 | 19 |
| Sat 9/10 | @ Pittsburgh | W 34-27 | — | 1 | 8 | 8 | 8 | 0 | 8 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Tennessee
2018-2022
Opening stop
Season Value Progression
2018201920202021202120222022
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2018 Regular Season | Tennessee | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| 2019 Regular Season | Tennessee | 15 | 50 | 7.8 | 15 |
| 2020 Regular Season | Tennessee | 94 | 56.7 | 9.7 | 79 |
| 2021 Postseason | Tennessee | 220 | 69.7 | 9 | 126 |
| 2021 Regular Season | Tennessee | 220 | 69.7 | 9 | 0 |
| 2022 Postseason | Tennessee | 241 | 65.8 | 9.1 | 21 |
| 2022 Regular Season | Tennessee | 241 | 65.8 | 9.1 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Purdue
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
71
Primary metric
71 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Chattanooga
19
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
19 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
South Carolina
57
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
57 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
Auburn
28
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
28 receiving yards with a 62.2 efficiency score.
#5
Pittsburgh
47
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
47 receiving yards with a 78.3 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by Season Value
2022 Postseason · Tennessee
241 primary output · 65.8 efficiency · 9.1 usage
58
#2
2022 Regular Season · Tennessee
58
241 primary · 65.8 efficiency · 9.1 usage
#3
2021 Postseason · Tennessee
50.2
220 primary · 69.7 efficiency · 9 usage
Milestones
0
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
1
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Career Facts
1
Career teams
7
Seasons tracked
570
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 7 tracked seasons, 32 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Next best actions
Keep exploring Princeton Fant
Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.