Usage Score
26.4
Player Dossier
2015-2018Ole Miss
QB • 6'2" • 212 lbs • Pearl City, HI, USA
Jordan Ta'amu is a balanced quarterback profile with 26.4 usage in the latest tracked season.
Usage Score
26.4
Efficiency
63.9
Consistency
71.5
Season Value
65.4
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by Season Value: 2018 Regular Season · Ole Miss
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Jordan Ta'amu, QB. Best season Best season by Season Value: 2018 Regular Season · Ole Miss. Jordan Ta'amu is a balanced quarterback profile with 26.4 usage in the latest tracked season.
Jordan Ta'amu played QB for Ole Miss. Across 4 tracked seasons, Jordan Ta'amu recorded 5,194 passing yards, 513 rushing yards, and 38 touchdowns. His top tracked season came in 2018 with Ole Miss.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2018 Regular Season
Ole Miss paired 3,860 primary output with 63.9 efficiency.
Supporting note
2018 Regular Season role shape
pass-led usage with 63.9 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value is trending up
2018 Regular Season improved on the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Arkansas
Win with balanced pass-rush production and strong creator value. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
12
Primary Metric / G
321.7
Efficiency
63.9
Usage
26.4
Consistency
71.5
Best Game by takeover score
Arkansas
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Texas Tech: 343. Southern Illinois: 446. Alabama: 152. Kent State: 442. LSU: 203. UL Monroe: 437. Arkansas: 528. Auburn: 334. South Carolina: 445. Texas A&M: 0. Vanderbilt: 467. Mississippi State: 63
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Texas Tech: 38 by 67. Southern Illinois: 35 by 67.4. Alabama: 30 by 42.4. Kent State: 44 by 65. LSU: 46 by 52.4. UL Monroe: 30 by 96.9. Arkansas: 52 by 84.5. Auburn: 58 by 60.5. South Carolina: 67 by 66.9. Vanderbilt: 61 by 57.9. Mississippi State: 21 by 41.5
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
12 games
Featured metric
Total Offense
Top game by takeover score
Arkansas
Best efficiency game
96.9 vs UL Monroe
| Result | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fri 11/23 | vs Mississippi State | L 3-35 | 8 | 17 | 87 | 47.1 | 0 | 1 | 41.5 | 4 | -24 | -6 | 0 | 0 |
| Sun 11/18 | @ Vanderbilt300-yard game | L 29-36 | 32 | 51 | 457 | 62.7 | 2 | 2 | 57.9 | 10 | 10 | 1 | 0 | 12 |
| Sat 11/10 | @ Texas A&M | L 24-38 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sat 11/3 | vs South Carolina300-yard game · Dual-threat | L 44-48 | 31 | 46 | 379 | 67.4 | 0 | 0 | 66.9 | 21 | 66 | 3.10 | 1 | 17 |
| Sat 10/20 | vs Auburn | L 16-31 | 23 | 40 | 291 | 57.5 | 1 | 0 | 60.5 | 18 | 43 | 2.40 | 0 | 14 |
| Sat 10/13 | @ Arkansas300-yard game · 3+ TD | W 37-33 | 26 | 35 | 387 | 74.3 | 2 | 1 | 84.5 | 17 | 141 | 8.30 | 1 | 27 |
| Sat 10/6 | vs UL Monroe300-yard game · 3+ TD | W 70-21 | 21 | 24 | 374 | 87.5 | 3 | 0 | 96.9 | 6 | 63 | 10.50 | 2 | 39 |
| Sun 9/30 | @ LSU | L 16-45 | 19 | 38 | 178 | 50.0 | 0 | 1 | 52.4 | 8 | 25 | 3.10 | 0 | 11 |
| Sat 9/22 | vs Kent State300-yard game · 3+ TD | W 38-17 | 28 | 38 | 442 | 73.7 | 2 | 1 | 65 | 6 | 0 | -0.80 | 1 | 4 |
| Sat 9/15 | vs Alabama | L 7-62 | 7 | 22 | 133 | 31.8 | 1 | 2 | 42.4 | 8 | 19 | 2.40 | 0 | 21 |
| Sat 9/8 | vs Southern Illinois300-yard game · 3+ TD | W 76-41 | 23 | 33 | 448 | 69.7 | 5 | 0 | 67.4 | 2 | -2 | -1 | 0 | 5 |
| Sat 9/1 | @ Texas Tech300-yard game | W 47-27 | 22 | 32 | 336 | 68.8 | 2 | 0 | 67 | 6 | 7 | 1.20 | 0 | 7 |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Ole Miss
2015-2018
Opening stop
Season Value Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2015 Regular Season | Ole Miss | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2016 Regular Season | Ole Miss | 0 | — | — | 0 |
| 2017 Regular Season | Ole Miss | 1,847 | 71.5 | 24.9 | 1,847 |
| 2018 Regular Season | Ole Miss | 3,860 | 63.9 | 26.4 | 2,013 |
#1 Featured game
Arkansas
Win with balanced pass-rush production and strong creator value.
528
Primary metric
528 total offense with 84.5 efficiency.
#2
Arkansas
444
Primary metric
Loss with balanced pass-rush production and strong creator value.
444 total offense with 84.4 efficiency.
#3
UL Monroe
437
Primary metric
Win with balanced pass-rush production and strong creator value.
437 total offense with 96.9 efficiency.
#4
South Carolina
445
Primary metric
Loss with balanced pass-rush production and strong creator value.
445 total offense with 66.9 efficiency.
#5
Kentucky
390
Primary metric
Win with 390 yards of offense and 66.3 efficiency.
390 total offense with 66.3 efficiency.
#1 Season by Season Value
2018 Regular Season · Ole Miss
3,860 primary output · 63.9 efficiency · 26.4 usage
65.4
#2
2017 Regular Season · Ole Miss
53.1
1,847 primary · 71.5 efficiency · 24.9 usage
#3
2015 Regular Season · Ole Miss
—
0 primary · — efficiency · — usage
11
250+ passing yards
11
300+ total offense
6
3+ TD games
12
Above avg efficiency
Career Facts
1
Career teams
4
Seasons tracked
5,707
Career Total Offense
Data Context
Coverage spans 4 tracked seasons, 19 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Next best actions
Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.