Usage Score
9.2
Player Dossier
2017-2021Michigan State
Jacub Panasiuk
DE • 6'4" • 250 lbs • Roselle, IL, USA
Ball-hunting defenderSplash play profile
Jacub Panasiuk shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 30.3 disruption score.
Efficiency
30.3
Consistency
51.5
Season Value
38.7
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2021 Postseason · Michigan State
1718181919202121
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 8
- Program Path
- Michigan State
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Indiana
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Jacub Panasiuk, DE. Best season Best season by value score: 2021 Postseason · Michigan State. Jacub Panasiuk shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 30.3 disruption score.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2021 Postseason
Michigan State paired 21 primary output with 30.3 efficiency.
Supporting note
2021 Postseason role shape
impact-led usage with 30.3 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2021 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Nebraska
Win with backfield disruption leading the way. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2021 Postseason · Michigan State
Games
12
Havoc Plays / G
1.8
Efficiency
30.3
Usage
9.2
Consistency
51.5
Best Game by takeover score
Pittsburgh
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
123456789101112
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Pittsburgh: 3. Northwestern: 0. Unknown: 2. Miami: 1. Nebraska: 4. Western Kentucky: 4. Rutgers: 1. Indiana: 3. Michigan: 1. Purdue: 0. Maryland: 0. Penn State: 2
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Pittsburgh: 5 by 50.8. Northwestern: 0 by 0. Unknown: 4 by 36.7. Miami: 1 by 14.2. Nebraska: 7 by 69.2. Western Kentucky: 2 by 48.3. Rutgers: 4 by 26.7. Indiana: 5 by 50.8. Michigan: 2 by 18.3. Purdue: 3 by 12.5. Maryland: 0 by 0. Penn State: 4 by 36.7
Split Comparison
Wins1.9 · n=10
First Half2.3 · n=6 · +1.2 vs Second Half
Second Half1.2 · n=6 · -1.2 vs First Half
All Games1.8 · n=12
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
12 games
Featured metric
Havoc Plays
Top game by takeover score
Nebraska
Best efficiency game
69.2 vs Nebraska
| Result | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fri 12/31 | vs PittsburghSplash game | W 31-21 | 5 | 1 | — | 2 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/27 | vs Penn State | W 30-27 | 4 | 1 | — | 0.50 | 0.50 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 11/13 | vs Maryland | W 40-21 | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/6 | @ Purdue | L 29-40 | 3 | 3 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/30 | vs Michigan | W 37-33 | 2 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 10/16 | @ Indiana | W 20-15 | 5 | 3 | — | 1 | 1 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 10/9 | @ Rutgers | W 31-13 | 4 | 0 | — | 0.50 | 0.50 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/2 | vs Western Kentucky2+ sacks · Splash game | W 48-31 | 2 | 2 | — | 2 | 2 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/25 | vs Nebraska2+ sacks · Splash game | W 23-20 | 7 | 2 | — | 2 | 2 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/18 | @ Miami | W 38-17 | 1 | 1 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/11 | vs UnknownSplash game | — | 4 | 1 | — | 2 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/4 | @ Northwestern | W 38-21 | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Michigan State
2017-2021
Opening stop
Season Progression
20172018201820192019202020212021
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2017 Regular Season | Michigan State | 4 | 14.6 | 5.7 | — |
| 2018 Postseason | Michigan State | 7.5 | 18.6 | 5.1 | 3.5 |
| 2018 Regular Season | Michigan State | 7.5 | 18.6 | 5.1 | 0 |
| 2019 Postseason | Michigan State | 14 | 22.4 | 7 | 6.5 |
| 2019 Regular Season | Michigan State | 14 | 22.4 | 7 | 0 |
| 2020 Regular Season | Michigan State | 4.5 | 29.8 | 10.4 | -9.5 |
| 2021 Postseason | Michigan State | 21 | 30.3 | 9.2 | 16.5 |
| 2021 Regular Season | Michigan State | 21 | 30.3 | 9.2 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Indiana
Loss with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2
Primary metric
2 disruption/tackle impact with 62.8 takeover score.
#2
Nebraska
4
Primary metric
Win with backfield disruption leading the way.
4 disruption/tackle impact with 61.3 takeover score.
#3
Western Kentucky
4
Primary metric
Win with backfield disruption leading the way.
4 disruption/tackle impact with 58.2 takeover score.
#4
Maryland
3.5
Primary metric
Win with 3.5 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
3.5 disruption/tackle impact with 55.9 takeover score.
#5
Indiana
2
Primary metric
Win with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 52.7 takeover score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2021 Postseason · Michigan State
21 primary output · 30.3 efficiency · 9.2 usage
38.7
#2
2021 Regular Season · Michigan State
38.7
21 primary · 30.3 efficiency · 9.2 usage
#3
2019 Postseason · Michigan State
30
14 primary · 22.4 efficiency · 7 usage
Milestones
2
Impact games
6
Splash games
0
10+ tackle games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
3★
Class 2017 · Rating 0.8661
Lake Park · Roselle, IL
- Committed To
- Michigan State
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2017
Career Facts
1
Career teams
8
Seasons tracked
139
Career Tackles
Data Context
Coverage spans 8 tracked seasons, 47 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.