Usage Score
9.2
Player Dossier
2017-2021Michigan State
DE • 6'4" • 250 lbs • Roselle, IL, USA
Jacub Panasiuk shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 30.3 disruption score.
Usage Score
9.2
Efficiency
30.3
Consistency
51.5
Season Value
38.7
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2021 Postseason · Michigan State
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Jacub Panasiuk, DE. Best season Best season by value score: 2021 Postseason · Michigan State. Jacub Panasiuk shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 30.3 disruption score.
Jacub Panasiuk played DE for Michigan State. Across 5 tracked seasons, Jacub Panasiuk recorded 139 tackles. His top tracked season came in 2021 with Michigan State.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2021 Postseason
Michigan State paired 21 primary output with 30.3 efficiency.
Supporting note
2021 Postseason role shape
impact-led usage with 30.3 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2021 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Nebraska
Win with backfield disruption leading the way. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
12
Havoc Plays / G
1.8
Efficiency
30.3
Usage
9.2
Consistency
51.5
Best Game by takeover score
Pittsburgh
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Pittsburgh: 3. Northwestern: 0. Unknown: 2. Miami: 1. Nebraska: 4. Western Kentucky: 4. Rutgers: 1. Indiana: 3. Michigan: 1. Purdue: 0. Maryland: 0. Penn State: 2
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Pittsburgh: 5 by 50.8. Northwestern: 0 by 0. Unknown: 4 by 36.7. Miami: 1 by 14.2. Nebraska: 7 by 69.2. Western Kentucky: 2 by 48.3. Rutgers: 4 by 26.7. Indiana: 5 by 50.8. Michigan: 2 by 18.3. Purdue: 3 by 12.5. Maryland: 0 by 0. Penn State: 4 by 36.7
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
12 games
Featured metric
Havoc Plays
Top game by takeover score
Nebraska
Best efficiency game
69.2 vs Nebraska
| Result | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fri 12/31 | vs PittsburghSplash game | W 31-21 | 5 | 1 | — | 2 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/27 | vs Penn State | W 30-27 | 4 | 1 | — | 0.50 | 0.50 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 11/13 | vs Maryland | W 40-21 | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/6 | @ Purdue | L 29-40 | 3 | 3 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/30 | vs Michigan | W 37-33 | 2 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 10/16 | @ Indiana | W 20-15 | 5 | 3 | — | 1 | 1 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 10/9 | @ Rutgers | W 31-13 | 4 | 0 | — | 0.50 | 0.50 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/2 | vs Western Kentucky2+ sacks · Splash game | W 48-31 | 2 | 2 | — | 2 | 2 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/25 | vs Nebraska2+ sacks · Splash game | W 23-20 | 7 | 2 | — | 2 | 2 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/18 | @ Miami | W 38-17 | 1 | 1 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/11 | vs UnknownSplash game | — | 4 | 1 | — | 2 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/4 | @ Northwestern | W 38-21 | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Michigan State
2017-2021
Opening stop
Season Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2017 Regular Season | Michigan State | 4 | 14.6 | 5.7 | — |
| 2018 Postseason | Michigan State | 7.5 | 18.6 | 5.1 | 3.5 |
| 2018 Regular Season | Michigan State | 7.5 | 18.6 | 5.1 | 0 |
| 2019 Postseason | Michigan State | 14 | 22.4 | 7 | 6.5 |
| 2019 Regular Season | Michigan State | 14 | 22.4 | 7 | 0 |
| 2020 Regular Season | Michigan State | 4.5 | 29.8 | 10.4 | -9.5 |
| 2021 Postseason | Michigan State | 21 | 30.3 | 9.2 | 16.5 |
| 2021 Regular Season | Michigan State | 21 | 30.3 | 9.2 | 0 |
#1 Featured game
Indiana
Loss with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2
Primary metric
2 disruption/tackle impact with 62.8 takeover score.
#2
Nebraska
4
Primary metric
Win with backfield disruption leading the way.
4 disruption/tackle impact with 61.3 takeover score.
#3
Western Kentucky
4
Primary metric
Win with backfield disruption leading the way.
4 disruption/tackle impact with 58.2 takeover score.
#4
Maryland
3.5
Primary metric
Win with 3.5 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
3.5 disruption/tackle impact with 55.9 takeover score.
#5
Indiana
2
Primary metric
Win with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 52.7 takeover score.
#1 Season by value score
2021 Postseason · Michigan State
21 primary output · 30.3 efficiency · 9.2 usage
38.7
#2
2021 Regular Season · Michigan State
38.7
21 primary · 30.3 efficiency · 9.2 usage
#3
2019 Postseason · Michigan State
30
14 primary · 22.4 efficiency · 7 usage
2
Impact games
6
Splash games
0
10+ tackle games
Recruit Profile
Class 2017 · Rating 0.8661
Lake Park · Roselle, IL
Career Facts
1
Career teams
8
Seasons tracked
139
Career Tackles
Data Context
Coverage spans 8 tracked seasons, 47 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.