Usage Score
6.2
Player Dossier
2016-2021Houston
CB • 5'8" • 185 lbs • Enterprise, AL, USA
Marcus Jones shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 29.7 disruption score.
Usage Score
6.2
Efficiency
29.7
Consistency
35.6
Season Value
42.9
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by Season Value: 2021 Regular Season · Houston
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Marcus Jones, CB. Best season Best season by Season Value: 2021 Regular Season · Houston. Marcus Jones shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 29.7 disruption score.
Marcus Jones played CB for Troy and Houston. Across 6 tracked seasons, Marcus Jones recorded 9 rushing yards, 137 receiving yards, and 152 tackles. His top tracked season came in 2021 with Houston.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2021 Regular Season
Houston paired 19 primary output with 29.7 efficiency.
Supporting note
2021 Regular Season role shape
impact-led usage with 29.7 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value is trending up
2021 Regular Season improved on the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Multi-stop career journey
Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across Troy, Houston.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Memphis
Win with 5 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
13
Havoc Plays / G
1.5
Efficiency
29.7
Usage
6.2
Consistency
35.6
Best Game by takeover score
Memphis
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Texas Tech: 0. Rice: 0. Grambling: 0. Navy: 0. Tulsa: 2. Tulane: 0. East Carolina: 1. SMU: 2. South Florida: 3. Temple: 1. Memphis: 5. UConn: 4. Cincinnati: 1
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Texas Tech: 6 by 25. Grambling: 1 by 4.2. Navy: 0 by 0. Tulsa: 4 by 36.7. Tulane: 6 by 25. East Carolina: 7 by 39.2. SMU: 6 by 45. South Florida: 4 by 46.7. Temple: 4 by 26.7. Memphis: 6 by 75. UConn: 2 by 48.3. Cincinnati: 1 by 14.2
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
13 games
Featured metric
Havoc Plays
Top game by takeover score
Memphis
Best efficiency game
75 vs Memphis
| Result | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 12/4 | @ Cincinnati | L 20-35 | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 11/27 | @ UConnSplash game | W 45-17 | 2 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 4 | — | — |
| Sat 11/20 | vs MemphisSplash game | W 31-13 | 6 | 5 | — | 0 | 0 | 2 | 3 | — | — |
| Sat 11/13 | @ Temple | W 37-8 | 4 | 3 | — | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/6 | @ South FloridaSplash game | W 54-42 | 4 | 4 | — | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | — | — |
| Sat 10/30 | vs SMUSplash game | W 44-37 | 6 | 6 | — | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/23 | vs East Carolina | W 31-24 | 7 | 5 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Thu 10/7 | @ Tulane | W 40-22 | 6 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Fri 10/1 | @ TulsaSplash game | W 45-10 | 4 | 3 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 2 | — | — |
| Sat 9/25 | vs Navy | W 28-20 | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/18 | vs Grambling | W 45-0 | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/11 | @ Rice | W 44-7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sat 9/4 | vs Texas Tech | L 21-38 | 6 | 5 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Troy
2016-2018
Opening stop
Houston
2019-2021
Final stop
Season Value Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2016 Regular Season | Troy | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2017 Postseason | Troy | 10 | 23.4 | 4.2 | 10 |
| 2017 Regular Season | Troy | 10 | 23.4 | 4.2 | 0 |
| 2018 Postseason | Troy | 9 | 20.3 | 2.8 | -1 |
| 2018 Regular Season | Troy | 9 | 20.3 | 2.8 | 0 |
| 2019 Regular Season | Houston | 0 | — | — | -9 |
| 2020 Postseason | Houston | 7 | 24.3 | 4.6 | 7 |
| 2020 Regular Season | Houston | 7 | 24.3 | 4.6 | 0 |
| 2021 Regular Season | Houston | 19 | 29.7 | 6.2 | 12 |
#1 Featured game
Memphis
Win with 5 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
5
Primary metric
5 disruption/tackle impact with 64 takeover score.
#2
Memphis
5
Primary metric
Loss with 5 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
5 disruption/tackle impact with 63 takeover score.
#3
UL Monroe
3
Primary metric
Win with 3 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
3 disruption/tackle impact with 54.7 takeover score.
#4
Arkansas State
2.5
Primary metric
Win with 2.5 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2.5 disruption/tackle impact with 50 takeover score.
#5
LSU
2
Primary metric
Win with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 49.3 takeover score.
#1 Season by Season Value
2021 Regular Season · Houston
19 primary output · 29.7 efficiency · 6.2 usage
42.9
#2
2017 Postseason · Troy
29.3
10 primary · 23.4 efficiency · 4.2 usage
#3
2017 Regular Season · Troy
29.3
10 primary · 23.4 efficiency · 4.2 usage
2
Impact games
13
Splash games
0
10+ tackle games
Career Facts
2
Career teams
9
Seasons tracked
152
Career Tackles
Data Context
Coverage spans 9 tracked seasons, 44 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Next best actions
Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.