Player Stats

Dy'jonn Turner College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Tackles
128
TFL
5
Sacks
1
QB hurries
3
Passes defended
18

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesTacklesTFLSacksQB HurPDTDOverall
2017 Regular SeasonUAB00-0--0-
2018 Regular SeasonUAB1315-0-2013.1
2019 PostseasonUAB146-0--053.6
2019 Regular SeasonUAB14391.50110053.6
2020 Regular SeasonUAB7272022042.7
2021 PostseasonUAB92-0-1040.5
2021 Regular SeasonUAB9391.51-3040.5

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2019 Postseason

UAB paired 13.5 primary output with 23 efficiency.

Supporting note

2021 Postseason role shape

impact-led usage with 26.2 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value stayed steady

2021 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: Rice

Loss with 2.5 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2021 Postseason · UAB

Games

9

Havoc Plays / G

0.7

Efficiency

26.2

Usage

4.3

Consistency

51.9

Best Game by takeover score

Rice

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

123456789

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. BYU: 1. Jacksonville State: 1. Georgia: 1. Southern Miss: 0. Rice: 2.5. Louisiana Tech: 0. Marshall: 1. UTSA: 0. UTEP: 0

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. BYU: 2 by 18.3. Jacksonville State: 6 by 35. Georgia: 3 by 22.5. Southern Miss: 2 by 8.3. Rice: 6 by 50. Louisiana Tech: 6 by 25. Marshall: 6 by 35. UTSA: 3 by 12.5. UTEP: 7 by 29.2

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins0.5 · Games = 6 · -0.7 vs Losses
Losses1.2 · Games = 3 · +0.7 vs Wins