Usage Score
4.4
Player Dossier
2017-2021UAB
S • 5'11" • 205 lbs • Florence, AL, USA
Dy'jonn Turner shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 26.2 disruption score.
Usage Score
4.4
Efficiency
26.2
Consistency
51.9
Season Value
24.7
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2019 Postseason · UAB
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Dy'jonn Turner, S. Best season Best season by value score: 2019 Postseason · UAB. Dy'jonn Turner shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 26.2 disruption score.
Dy'jonn Turner played S for UAB. Across 5 tracked seasons, Dy'jonn Turner recorded 17 receiving yards and 128 tackles. His top tracked season came in 2021 with UAB.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2019 Postseason
UAB paired 12.5 primary output with 22.3 efficiency.
Supporting note
2021 Postseason role shape
impact-led usage with 26.2 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2021 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Rice
Loss with 2.5 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
9
Havoc Plays / G
0.7
Efficiency
26.2
Usage
4.4
Consistency
51.9
Best Game by takeover score
BYU
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. BYU: 1. Unknown: 1. Georgia: 1. Southern Miss: 0. Rice: 2.5. Louisiana Tech: 0. Marshall: 1. UTSA: 0. UTEP: 0
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. BYU: 2 by 18.3. Unknown: 6 by 35. Georgia: 3 by 22.5. Southern Miss: 2 by 8.3. Rice: 6 by 50. Louisiana Tech: 6 by 25. Marshall: 6 by 35. UTSA: 3 by 12.5. UTEP: 7 by 29.2
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
9 games
Featured metric
Havoc Plays
Top game by takeover score
Rice
Best efficiency game
50 vs Rice
| Result | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 12/18 | @ BYU | W 31-28 | 2 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Fri 11/26 | vs UTEP | W 42-25 | 7 | 5 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/20 | @ UTSA | L 31-34 | 3 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/13 | @ Marshall | W 21-14 | 6 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 11/6 | vs Louisiana Tech | W 52-38 | 6 | 4 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/23 | vs Rice | L 24-30 | 6 | 3 | — | 1.50 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/16 | @ Southern Miss | W 34-0 | 2 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/11 | @ Georgia | L 7-56 | 3 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Wed 9/1 | @ Unknown | — | 6 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
UAB
2017-2021
Opening stop
Season Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2017 Regular Season | UAB | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2018 Regular Season | UAB | 3 | 7.9 | 1.9 | 3 |
| 2019 Postseason | UAB | 12.5 | 22.3 | 3.8 | 9.5 |
| 2019 Regular Season | UAB | 12.5 | 22.3 | 3.8 | 0 |
| 2020 Regular Season | UAB | 4 | 21.8 | 4.9 | -8.5 |
| 2021 Postseason | UAB | 6.5 | 26.2 | 4.4 | 2.5 |
| 2021 Regular Season | UAB | 6.5 | 26.2 | 4.4 | 0 |
#1 Featured game
Rice
Loss with 2.5 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2.5
Primary metric
2.5 disruption/tackle impact with 54.1 takeover score.
#2
South Alabama
2
Primary metric
Win with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 46.6 takeover score.
#3
Unknown
2
Primary metric
Game with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 45.1 takeover score.
#4
Louisiana Tech
2
Primary metric
Win with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 43.4 takeover score.
#5
Middle Tennessee
1
Primary metric
Win with 1 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
1 disruption/tackle impact with 43.3 takeover score.
#1 Season by value score
2019 Postseason · UAB
12.5 primary output · 22.3 efficiency · 3.8 usage
29.3
#2
2019 Regular Season · UAB
29.3
12.5 primary · 22.3 efficiency · 3.8 usage
#3
2021 Postseason · UAB
24.7
6.5 primary · 26.2 efficiency · 4.4 usage
0
Impact games
0
Splash games
0
10+ tackle games
Recruit Profile
Class 2017 · Rating 0.7683
Florence · Florence, AL
Career Facts
1
Career teams
7
Seasons tracked
128
Career Tackles
Data Context
Coverage spans 7 tracked seasons, 43 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.