Usage Score
41.9
Player Dossier
2015-2018UConn
QB • 6'0" • 195 lbs • Columbia, MD, USA
David Pindell is a pass-first distributor with 41.9 usage in the latest tracked season.
Usage Score
41.9
Efficiency
59.4
Consistency
66
Season Value
66.8
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by Season Value: 2018 Regular Season · UConn
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
David Pindell, QB. Best season Best season by Season Value: 2018 Regular Season · UConn. David Pindell is a pass-first distributor with 41.9 usage in the latest tracked season.
David Pindell played QB for UConn. Across 4 tracked seasons, David Pindell recorded 2,888 passing yards, 1,431 rushing yards, and 16 receiving yards. His top tracked season came in 2018 with UConn.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2018 Regular Season
UConn paired 3,093 primary output with 59.4 efficiency.
Supporting note
2018 Regular Season role shape
pass-led usage with 59.4 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value is trending up
2018 Regular Season improved on the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Rhode Island
Win with balanced pass-rush production and strong creator value. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
12
Primary Metric / G
257.8
Efficiency
59.4
Usage
41.9
Consistency
66
Best Game by takeover score
Rhode Island
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. UCF: 423. Boise State: 111. Rhode Island: 445. Syracuse: 227. Cincinnati: 147. Memphis: 225. South Florida: 330. Massachusetts: 135. Tulsa: 382. SMU: 396. East Carolina: 159. Temple: 113
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. UCF: 63 by 70.4. Boise State: 35 by 47.5. Rhode Island: 53 by 76.8. Syracuse: 36 by 71.6. Cincinnati: 28 by 57.1. Memphis: 45 by 56.1. South Florida: 49 by 62.9. Massachusetts: 27 by 44.5. Tulsa: 51 by 67.5. SMU: 59 by 72.2. East Carolina: 40 by 49.5. Temple: 40 by 36.6
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
12 games
Featured metric
Total Offense
Top game by takeover score
Rhode Island
Best efficiency game
76.8 vs Rhode Island
| Result | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 11/24 | vs Temple | L 7-57 | 12 | 23 | 89 | 52.2 | 1 | 3 | 36.6 | 17 | 24 | 1.40 | 0 | 12 |
| Sun 11/18 | @ East Carolina3+ TD | L 21-55 | 15 | 25 | 156 | 60.0 | 3 | 1 | 49.5 | 15 | 3 | 0.20 | 0 | 8 |
| Sat 11/10 | vs SMU3+ TD · Dual-threat | L 50-62 | 25 | 38 | 215 | 65.8 | 4 | 1 | 72.2 | 21 | 181 | 8.60 | 2 | 48 |
| Sat 11/3 | @ TulsaDual-threat | L 19-49 | 14 | 28 | 232 | 50.0 | 2 | 1 | 67.5 | 23 | 150 | 6.50 | 0 | 24 |
| Sat 10/27 | vs MassachusettsDual-threat | L 17-22 | 4 | 6 | 15 | 66.7 | 0 | 1 | 44.5 | 21 | 120 | 5.70 | 1 | 25 |
| Sat 10/20 | @ South FloridaDual-threat | L 30-38 | 10 | 21 | 133 | 47.6 | 0 | 1 | 62.9 | 28 | 197 | 7 | 2 | 28 |
| Sat 10/6 | @ Memphis | L 14-55 | 22 | 37 | 190 | 59.5 | 1 | 2 | 56.1 | 8 | 35 | 4.40 | 1 | 10 |
| Sat 9/29 | vs Cincinnati | L 7-49 | 9 | 23 | 125 | 39.1 | 1 | 0 | 57.1 | 5 | 22 | 4.40 | 0 | 17 |
| Sat 9/22 | @ SyracuseDual-threat | L 21-51 | 17 | 24 | 151 | 70.8 | 1 | 0 | 71.6 | 12 | 76 | 6.30 | 1 | 75 |
| Sat 9/15 | vs Rhode Island300-yard game · 3+ TD | W 56-49 | 20 | 27 | 308 | 74.1 | 4 | 1 | 76.8 | 26 | 137 | 5.30 | 2 | 45 |
| Sun 9/9 | @ Boise State | L 7-62 | 11 | 21 | 71 | 52.4 | 1 | 1 | 47.5 | 14 | 40 | 2.90 | 0 | 12 |
| Thu 8/30 | vs UCFDual-threat | L 17-56 | 27 | 41 | 266 | 65.9 | 1 | 1 | 70.4 | 22 | 157 | 7.10 | 1 | 26 |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
UConn
2015-2018
Opening stop
Season Value Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2015 Regular Season | UConn | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2016 Regular Season | UConn | 0 | — | — | 0 |
| 2017 Regular Season | UConn | 1,226 | 49.8 | 23.1 | 1,226 |
| 2018 Regular Season | UConn | 3,093 | 59.4 | 41.9 | 1,867 |
#1 Featured game
Rhode Island
Win with balanced pass-rush production and strong creator value.
445
Primary metric
445 total offense with 76.8 efficiency.
#2
UCF
423
Primary metric
Loss with balanced pass-rush production and strong creator value.
423 total offense with 70.4 efficiency.
#3
SMU
396
Primary metric
Loss with balanced pass-rush production and strong creator value.
396 total offense with 72.2 efficiency.
#4
Cincinnati
368
Primary metric
Loss with balanced pass-rush production and strong creator value.
368 total offense with 58.2 efficiency.
#5
Tulsa
382
Primary metric
Loss with balanced pass-rush production and strong creator value.
382 total offense with 67.5 efficiency.
#1 Season by Season Value
2018 Regular Season · UConn
3,093 primary output · 59.4 efficiency · 41.9 usage
66.8
#2
2017 Regular Season · UConn
43
1,226 primary · 49.8 efficiency · 23.1 usage
#3
2015 Regular Season · UConn
—
0 primary · — efficiency · — usage
3
250+ passing yards
6
300+ total offense
4
3+ TD games
9
Above avg efficiency
Career Facts
1
Career teams
4
Seasons tracked
4,319
Career Total Offense
Data Context
Coverage spans 4 tracked seasons, 19 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Next best actions
Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.