Usage Score
3.9
Player Dossier
2017-2021Cincinnati
Coby Bryant
CB • 6'1" • 198 lbs • Akron, OH, USA
Ball-hunting defenderSplash play profile
Coby Bryant shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 24.2 disruption score.
Efficiency
24.2
Consistency
60.5
Season Value
29.3
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2017 Regular Season · Cincinnati
171818191920202121
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 9
- Program Path
- Cincinnati
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Temple
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Coby Bryant, CB. Best season Best season by value score: 2017 Regular Season · Cincinnati. Coby Bryant shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 24.2 disruption score.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2017 Regular Season
Cincinnati paired 0 primary output with 5.6 efficiency.
Supporting note
2021 Postseason role shape
impact-led usage with 24.2 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2021 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Notre Dame
Win with 3 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2021 Postseason · Cincinnati
Games
14
Havoc Plays / G
1.1
Efficiency
24.2
Usage
3.9
Consistency
60.5
Best Game by takeover score
Alabama
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
1234567891011121314
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Alabama: 0. Miami (OH): 1. Unknown: 1. Indiana: 1. Notre Dame: 3. Temple: 1.5. UCF: 2. Navy: 2. Tulane: 1. Tulsa: 0. South Florida: 2. SMU: 1. East Carolina: 0. Houston: 0
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Alabama: 4 by 16.7. Miami (OH): 4 by 26.7. Unknown: 3 by 22.5. Indiana: 0 by 10. Notre Dame: 7 by 59.2. Temple: 6 by 40. UCF: 1 by 24.2. Navy: 1 by 24.2. Tulane: 2 by 18.3. Tulsa: 2 by 8.3. South Florida: 6 by 45. SMU: 2 by 18.3. East Carolina: 3 by 12.5. Houston: 3 by 12.5
Split Comparison
Wins1.2 · n=12
First Half1.4 · n=7 · +0.5 vs Second Half
Second Half0.9 · n=7 · -0.5 vs First Half
All Games1.1 · n=14
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
14 games
Featured metric
Havoc Plays
Top game by takeover score
Notre Dame
Best efficiency game
59.2 vs Notre Dame
| Result | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fri 12/31 | @ Alabama | L 6-27 | 4 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 12/4 | vs Houston | W 35-20 | 3 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Fri 11/26 | @ East Carolina | W 35-13 | 3 | 3 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/20 | vs SMU | W 48-14 | 2 | 2 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Fri 11/12 | @ South Florida | W 45-28 | 6 | 6 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 2 | — | — |
| Sat 11/6 | vs Tulsa | W 28-20 | 2 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/30 | @ Tulane | W 31-12 | 2 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/23 | @ Navy | W 27-20 | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 2 | — | — |
| Sat 10/16 | vs UCF | W 56-21 | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | — | — |
| Fri 10/8 | vs Temple | W 52-3 | 6 | 3 | — | 0.50 | 0 | 1 | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/2 | @ Notre Dame | W 24-13 | 7 | 6 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 3 | — | — |
| Sat 9/18 | @ Indiana | W 38-24 | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 9/11 | vs Unknown | — | 3 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 9/4 | vs Miami (OH) | W 49-14 | 4 | 4 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Cincinnati
2017-2021
Opening stop
Season Progression
201720182018201920192020202020212021
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2017 Regular Season | Cincinnati | 0 | 5.6 | 0.9 | — |
| 2018 Postseason | Cincinnati | 11 | 23.5 | 3.9 | 11 |
| 2018 Regular Season | Cincinnati | 11 | 23.5 | 3.9 | 0 |
| 2019 Postseason | Cincinnati | 11.5 | 24.3 | 4.6 | 0.5 |
| 2019 Regular Season | Cincinnati | 11.5 | 24.3 | 4.6 | 0 |
| 2020 Postseason | Cincinnati | 12 | 26.6 | 5.6 | 0.5 |
| 2020 Regular Season | Cincinnati | 12 | 26.6 | 5.6 | 0 |
| 2021 Postseason | Cincinnati | 15.5 | 24.2 | 3.9 | 3.5 |
| 2021 Regular Season | Cincinnati | 15.5 | 24.2 | 3.9 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Temple
Loss with 5 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
5
Primary metric
5 disruption/tackle impact with 61.4 takeover score.
#2
South Florida
4
Primary metric
Win with 4 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
4 disruption/tackle impact with 58.8 takeover score.
#3
East Carolina
3
Primary metric
Win with 3 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
3 disruption/tackle impact with 56.1 takeover score.
#4
Notre Dame
3
Primary metric
Win with 3 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
3 disruption/tackle impact with 54.9 takeover score.
#5
South Florida
2
Primary metric
Win with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 39.1 takeover score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2017 Regular Season · Cincinnati
0 primary output · 5.6 efficiency · 0.9 usage
35.5
#2
2021 Postseason · Cincinnati
29.3
15.5 primary · 24.2 efficiency · 3.9 usage
#3
2021 Regular Season · Cincinnati
29.3
15.5 primary · 24.2 efficiency · 3.9 usage
Milestones
1
Impact games
2
Splash games
0
10+ tackle games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
3★
Class 2017 · Rating 0.8189
Glenville · Cleveland, OH
- Committed To
- Cincinnati
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2017
Career Facts
1
Career teams
9
Seasons tracked
167
Career Tackles
Data Context
Coverage spans 9 tracked seasons, 51 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.