Player Stats

Trishton Jackson College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Receiving yards
1,282
Receptions
86
Touchdowns
13

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesRecRec YdsTDOverall
2015 Regular SeasonMichigan State0-00-
2016 Regular SeasonMichigan State4589134.7
2017 PostseasonMichigan State6-0038.4
2017 Regular SeasonMichigan State612143038.4
2018 PostseasonSyracuse1327152.6
2019 Regular SeasonSyracuse12661,0231182.2

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2019 Regular Season

Syracuse paired 1,023 primary output with 82.7 efficiency.

Supporting note

2019 Regular Season role shape

target-driven usage with 82.7 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value is trending up

2019 Regular Season improved on the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Multi-stop career journey

Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across Michigan State, Syracuse.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: Boston College

Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 91.7th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2019 Regular Season · Syracuse

Games

12

Receiving Yards / G

85.3

Efficiency

82.7

Usage

25.7

Consistency

60.5

Best Game by takeover score

Boston College

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

123456789101112

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Liberty: 21. Maryland: 157. Clemson: 16. Western Michigan: 141. Holy Cross: 58. NC State: 106. Pittsburgh: 76. Florida State: 57. Boston College: 148. Duke: 68. Louisville: 64. Wake Forest: 111

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Liberty: 3 by 46.7. Maryland: 7 by 100. Clemson: 2 by 53.3. Western Michigan: 6 by 100. Holy Cross: 6 by 64.4. NC State: 9 by 78.5. Pittsburgh: 5 by 100. Florida State: 5 by 76. Boston College: 8 by 100. Duke: 2 by 100. Louisville: 3 by 100. Wake Forest: 10 by 74

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins79.8 · Games = 5 · -9.3 vs Losses
Losses89.1 · Games = 7 · +9.3 vs Wins