Usage Score
25.7
Player Dossier
2015-2019Syracuse
WR • 6'1" • 191 lbs • West Bloomfield, MI, USA
Trishton Jackson reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Usage Score
25.7
Efficiency
82.7
Consistency
60.5
Season Value
67.2
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by Season Value: 2019 Regular Season · Syracuse
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Trishton Jackson, WR. Best season Best season by Season Value: 2019 Regular Season · Syracuse. Trishton Jackson reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Trishton Jackson played WR for Michigan State and Syracuse. Across 5 tracked seasons, Trishton Jackson recorded 5 passing yards, -3 rushing yards, and 1,282 receiving yards. His top tracked season came in 2019 with Syracuse.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2019 Regular Season
Syracuse paired 1,023 primary output with 82.7 efficiency.
Supporting note
2019 Regular Season role shape
target-driven usage with 82.7 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value is trending up
2019 Regular Season improved on the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Multi-stop career journey
Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across Michigan State, Syracuse.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Boston College
Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 91.7th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
12
Receiving Yards / G
85.3
Efficiency
82.7
Usage
25.7
Consistency
60.5
Best Game by takeover score
Boston College
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Liberty: 21. Maryland: 157. Clemson: 16. Western Michigan: 141. Holy Cross: 58. NC State: 106. Pittsburgh: 76. Florida State: 57. Boston College: 148. Duke: 68. Louisville: 64. Wake Forest: 111
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Liberty: 3 by 46.7. Maryland: 7 by 100. Clemson: 2 by 53.3. Western Michigan: 6 by 100. Holy Cross: 6 by 64.4. NC State: 9 by 78.5. Pittsburgh: 5 by 100. Florida State: 5 by 76. Boston College: 8 by 100. Duke: 2 by 100. Louisville: 3 by 100. Wake Forest: 10 by 74
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
12 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Boston College
Best efficiency game
100 vs Louisville
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 11/30 | vs Wake Forest100 receiving yards · High volume | W 39-30 | — | 10 | 111 | 11.1 | 11.10 | 1 | 26 |
| Sat 11/23 | @ Louisville | L 34-56 | — | 3 | 64 | 17.3 | 21.30 | 1 | 48 |
| Sat 11/16 | @ Duke | W 49-6 | — | 2 | 68 | 34 | 34 | 1 | 50 |
| Sat 11/2 | vs Boston College100 receiving yards · High volume | L 27-58 | — | 8 | 148 | 18.5 | 18.50 | 2 | 85 |
| Sat 10/26 | @ Florida State | L 17-35 | — | 5 | 57 | 9.2 | 11.40 | 0 | 23 |
| Fri 10/18 | vs Pittsburgh | L 20-27 | — | 5 | 76 | 15.2 | 15.20 | 0 | 40 |
| Fri 10/11 | @ NC State100 receiving yards · High volume | L 10-16 | — | 9 | 106 | 11.8 | 11.80 | 1 | 52 |
| Sat 9/28 | vs Holy Cross | W 41-3 | — | 6 | 58 | 9.7 | 9.70 | 1 | 17 |
| Sat 9/21 | vs Western Michigan100 receiving yards · 2+ TD | W 52-33 | — | 6 | 141 | 23.5 | 23.50 | 2 | 59 |
| Sat 9/14 | vs Clemson | L 6-41 | — | 2 | 16 | 8 | 8 | 0 | 12 |
| Sat 9/7 | @ Maryland100 receiving yards · 2+ TD | L 20-63 | — | 7 | 157 | 22.4 | 22.40 | 2 | 52 |
| Sat 8/31 | @ Liberty | W 24-0 | — | 3 | 21 | 7 | 7 | 0 | 9 |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Michigan State
2015-2017
Opening stop
Syracuse
2018-2019
Final stop
Season Value Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2015 Regular Season | Michigan State | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2016 Regular Season | Michigan State | 89 | 65.6 | 11.9 | 89 |
| 2017 Postseason | Michigan State | 143 | 65.9 | 10.1 | 54 |
| 2017 Regular Season | Michigan State | 143 | 65.9 | 10.1 | 0 |
| 2018 Postseason | Syracuse | 27 | 60 | 14.3 | -116 |
| 2019 Regular Season | Syracuse | 1,023 | 82.7 | 25.7 | 996 |
#1 Featured game
Boston College
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
148
Primary metric
148 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Maryland
157
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
157 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Rutgers
67
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
67 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
Western Michigan
141
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
141 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
Notre Dame
69
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
69 receiving yards with a 92 efficiency score.
#1 Season by Season Value
2019 Regular Season · Syracuse
1,023 primary output · 82.7 efficiency · 25.7 usage
67.2
#2
2018 Postseason · Syracuse
44.2
27 primary · 60 efficiency · 14.3 usage
#3
2017 Postseason · Michigan State
32.4
143 primary · 65.9 efficiency · 10.1 usage
5
100+ receiving yards
3
8+ catch outings
3
2+ TD games
Career Facts
2
Career teams
6
Seasons tracked
1,282
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 6 tracked seasons, 23 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Next best actions
Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.