Usage Score
17.4
Player Dossier
2014-2019Michigan
Devin Asiasi
TE • 6'3" • 279 lbs • Shoreview, CA, USA
Vertical playmakerExplosive finisher
Devin Asiasi reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
82.2
Consistency
57.5
Season Value
64
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2019 Regular Season · UCLA
1415161819
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 2
- Seasons Tracked
- 5
- Program Path
- Michigan • UCLA
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: USC
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Devin Asiasi, TE. Best season Best season by value score: 2019 Regular Season · UCLA. Devin Asiasi reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2019 Regular Season
UCLA paired 641 primary output with 82.2 efficiency.
Supporting note
2019 Regular Season role shape
target-driven usage with 82.2 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value is trending up
2019 Regular Season improved on the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Multi-stop career journey
Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across Michigan, UCLA.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: USC
Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2019 Regular Season · UCLA
Games
12
Receiving Yards / G
53.4
Efficiency
82.2
Usage
17.4
Consistency
57.5
Best Game by takeover score
California
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
123456789101112
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Cincinnati: 0. San Diego State: 43. Oklahoma: 71. Washington State: 50. Arizona: 27. Oregon State: 32. Stanford: 41. Arizona State: 20. Colorado: 45. Utah: 72. USC: 141. California: 99
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. San Diego State: 4 by 71.7. Oklahoma: 3 by 100. Washington State: 4 by 83.3. Arizona: 2 by 90. Oregon State: 3 by 71.1. Stanford: 4 by 68.3. Arizona State: 2 by 66.7. Colorado: 4 by 75. Utah: 5 by 96. USC: 5 by 100. California: 8 by 82.5
Split Comparison
Wins39 · n=4 · -21.6 vs Losses
Losses60.6 · n=8 · +21.6 vs Wins
First Half37.2 · n=6 · -32.5 vs Second Half
Second Half69.7 · n=6 · +32.5 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
12 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
USC
Best efficiency game
100 vs USC
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sun 12/1 | vs CaliforniaHigh volume | L 18-28 | — | 8 | 99 | 12.4 | 12.40 | 0 | 21 |
| Sat 11/23 | @ USC100 receiving yards | L 35-52 | — | 5 | 141 | 28.2 | 28.20 | 1 | 53 |
| Sun 11/17 | @ Utah | L 3-49 | — | 5 | 72 | 14.4 | 14.40 | 0 | 26 |
| Sun 11/3 | vs Colorado | W 31-14 | — | 4 | 45 | 11.3 | 11.30 | 1 | 16 |
| Sat 10/26 | vs Arizona State | W 42-32 | — | 2 | 20 | 10 | 10 | 1 | 12 |
| Fri 10/18 | @ Stanford | W 34-16 | — | 4 | 41 | 10.3 | 10.30 | 0 | 22 |
| Sun 10/6 | vs Oregon State | L 31-48 | — | 3 | 32 | 10.7 | 10.70 | 0 | 18 |
| Sun 9/29 | @ Arizona | L 17-20 | — | 2 | 27 | 13.5 | 13.50 | 0 | 16 |
| Sun 9/22 | @ Washington State | W 67-63 | — | 4 | 50 | 12.5 | 12.50 | 1 | 17 |
| Sun 9/15 | vs Oklahoma | L 14-48 | — | 3 | 71 | 23.7 | 23.70 | 0 | 28 |
| Sat 9/7 | vs San Diego State | L 14-23 | — | 4 | 43 | 10.8 | 10.80 | 0 | 17 |
| Thu 8/29 | @ Cincinnati | L 14-24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Michigan
2014-2016
Opening stop
- 2
UCLA
2018-2019
Final stop
Season Progression
20142015201620182019
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2014 Regular Season | Michigan | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2015 Regular Season | Michigan | 0 | — | — | 0 |
| 2016 Regular Season | Michigan | 18 | 60 | 5.6 | 18 |
| 2018 Regular Season | UCLA | 130 | 100 | 6 | 112 |
| 2019 Regular Season | UCLA | 641 | 82.2 | 17.4 | 511 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
USC
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
141
Primary metric
141 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Oregon
51
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
51 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Michigan State
15
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
15 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
California
99
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
99 receiving yards with a 82.5 efficiency score.
#5
Utah
72
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
72 receiving yards with a 96 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2019 Regular Season · UCLA
641 primary output · 82.2 efficiency · 17.4 usage
64
#2
2018 Regular Season · UCLA
48.3
130 primary · 100 efficiency · 6 usage
#3
2016 Regular Season · Michigan
32.4
18 primary · 60 efficiency · 5.6 usage
Milestones
1
100+ receiving yards
1
8+ catch outings
0
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
4★
Class 2016 · Rating 0.9633
De La Salle · Concord, CA
- Committed To
- Michigan
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2016
Career Facts
2
Career teams
5
Seasons tracked
789
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 5 tracked seasons, 18 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.