Usage Score
16.4
Player Dossier
2016-2017Houston
RB • 5'10" • 200 lbs • Houston, TX, USA
Dillon Birden leans balanced backfield option traits and 55.5 efficiency.
Usage Score
16.4
Efficiency
55.5
Consistency
63.2
Season Value
58.8
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by Season Value: 2017 Regular Season · Houston
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Dillon Birden, RB. Best season Best season by Season Value: 2017 Regular Season · Houston. Dillon Birden leans balanced backfield option traits and 55.5 efficiency.
Dillon Birden played RB for Houston. Across 2 tracked seasons, Dillon Birden recorded 622 rushing yards, 119 receiving yards, and 4 tackles. His top tracked season came in 2017 with Houston.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2017 Regular Season
Houston paired 398 primary output with 55.5 efficiency.
Supporting note
2017 Regular Season role shape
backfield-heavy usage with 55.5 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value is trending up
2017 Regular Season improved on the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Memphis
Loss driven by a workhorse rushing load. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
6
Scrimmage Yards / G
66.3
Efficiency
55.5
Usage
16.4
Consistency
63.2
Best Game by takeover score
Memphis
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Arizona: 105. Rice: 12. Texas Tech: 29. Temple: 44. Tulsa: 89. Memphis: 119
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Arizona: 17 by 62.8. Rice: 4 by 31.3. Texas Tech: 5 by 49.2. Temple: 8 by 58.3. Tulsa: 12 by 77.5. Memphis: 22 by 54.1
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
6 games
Featured metric
Scrimmage Yards
Top game by takeover score
Memphis
Best efficiency game
77.5 vs Tulsa
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Houston
2016-2017
Opening stop
Season Value Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2016 Regular Season | Houston | 343 | 45 | 8.9 | — |
| 2017 Regular Season | Houston | 398 | 55.5 | 16.4 | 55 |
#1 Featured game
Tulsa
Win with 103 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
103
Primary metric
103 scrimmage yards and 19.8 usage.
#2
Memphis
119
Primary metric
Loss driven by a workhorse rushing load.
119 scrimmage yards and 26.5 usage.
#3
Arizona
105
Primary metric
Win with 105 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
105 scrimmage yards and 27.4 usage.
#4
Tulsa
89
Primary metric
Loss with 89 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
89 scrimmage yards and 16.7 usage.
#5
UCF
74
Primary metric
Win with 74 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
74 scrimmage yards and 16 usage.
#1 Season by Season Value
2017 Regular Season · Houston
398 primary output · 55.5 efficiency · 16.4 usage
58.8
#2
2016 Regular Season · Houston
42.6
343 primary · 45 efficiency · 8.9 usage
1
100+ rush yards
0
150+ scrimmage yards
2
2+ TD games
Career Facts
1
Career teams
2
Seasons tracked
741
Career Scrimmage Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 2 tracked seasons, 17 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Next best actions
Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.