Usage Score
20.7
Player Dossier
2016-2017Buffalo
WR • 6'4" • 215 lbs • Philadelphia, PA, USA
Kamathi Holsey reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Usage Score
20.7
Efficiency
87.6
Consistency
67.8
Season Value
69
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by Season Value: 2017 Regular Season · Buffalo
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Kamathi Holsey, WR. Best season Best season by Season Value: 2017 Regular Season · Buffalo. Kamathi Holsey reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Kamathi Holsey played WR for Buffalo. Across 2 tracked seasons, Kamathi Holsey recorded 737 receiving yards, 3 tackles, and 2 touchdowns. His top tracked season came in 2017 with Buffalo.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2017 Regular Season
Buffalo paired 548 primary output with 87.6 efficiency.
Supporting note
2017 Regular Season role shape
target-driven usage with 87.6 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value is trending up
2017 Regular Season improved on the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Western Michigan
Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
8
Receiving Yards / G
68.5
Efficiency
87.6
Usage
20.7
Consistency
67.8
Best Game by takeover score
Western Michigan
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Army: 34. Colgate: 14. Florida Atlantic: 25. Western Michigan: 143. Miami (OH): 67. Akron: 100. Bowling Green: 88. Ohio: 77
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Army: 3 by 75.6. Colgate: 2 by 46.7. Florida Atlantic: 2 by 83.3. Western Michigan: 6 by 100. Miami (OH): 3 by 100. Akron: 7 by 95.2. Bowling Green: 4 by 100. Ohio: 5 by 100
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
8 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Western Michigan
Best efficiency game
100 vs Ohio
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fri 11/24 | vs Ohio | W 31-24 | — | 5 | 77 | 15.4 | 15.40 | 0 | 33 |
| Wed 11/8 | vs Bowling Green | W 38-28 | — | 4 | 88 | 22 | 22 | 0 | 51 |
| Sat 10/28 | @ Akron100 receiving yards | L 20-21 | — | 7 | 100 | 14.3 | 14.30 | 0 | 25 |
| Sat 10/21 | @ Miami (OH) | L 14-24 | — | 3 | 67 | 22.3 | 22.30 | 0 | 37 |
| Sat 10/7 | vs Western Michigan100 receiving yards | L 68-71 | — | 6 | 143 | 23.8 | 23.80 | 1 | 72 |
| Sat 9/23 | vs Florida Atlantic | W 34-31 | — | 2 | 25 | 12.5 | 12.50 | 0 | 14 |
| Sat 9/16 | vs Colgate | W 33-10 | — | 2 | 14 | 7 | 7 | 0 | 7 |
| Sat 9/9 | @ Army | L 17-21 | — | 3 | 34 | 11.3 | 11.30 | 0 | 12 |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Buffalo
2016-2017
Opening stop
Season Value Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2016 Regular Season | Buffalo | 189 | 60.6 | 10.3 | — |
| 2017 Regular Season | Buffalo | 548 | 87.6 | 20.7 | 359 |
#1 Featured game
Western Michigan
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
143
Primary metric
143 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Kent State
38
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
38 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
UAlbany
42
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
42 receiving yards with a 70 efficiency score.
#4
Akron
100
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
100 receiving yards with a 95.2 efficiency score.
#5
Ohio
77
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
77 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#1 Season by Season Value
2017 Regular Season · Buffalo
548 primary output · 87.6 efficiency · 20.7 usage
69
#2
2016 Regular Season · Buffalo
41
189 primary · 60.6 efficiency · 10.3 usage
2
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
0
2+ TD games
Career Facts
1
Career teams
2
Seasons tracked
737
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 2 tracked seasons, 17 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Next best actions
Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.