Usage Score
8.9
Player Dossier
2015-2018UTSA
LB • 6'0" • 225 lbs • Wichita, KS, USA
Les Maruo shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 38.6 disruption score.
Usage Score
8.9
Efficiency
38.6
Consistency
46.4
Season Value
48.5
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by Season Value: 2018 Regular Season · UTSA
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Les Maruo, LB. Best season Best season by Season Value: 2018 Regular Season · UTSA. Les Maruo shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 38.6 disruption score.
Les Maruo played LB for UTSA. Across 4 tracked seasons, Les Maruo recorded 98 tackles. His top tracked season came in 2018 with UTSA.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2018 Regular Season
UTSA paired 10.5 primary output with 38.6 efficiency.
Supporting note
2018 Regular Season role shape
impact-led usage with 38.6 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value is trending up
2018 Regular Season improved on the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Southern Miss
Loss with 2.5 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
12
Havoc Plays / G
0.9
Efficiency
38.6
Usage
8.9
Consistency
46.4
Best Game by takeover score
Southern Miss
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Arizona State: 0. Baylor: 1. Kansas State: 1. Texas State: 2. UTEP: 0.5. Rice: 2. Louisiana Tech: 0. Southern Miss: 2.5. UAB: 0. Florida International: 0.5. Marshall: 1. North Texas: 0
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Arizona State: 3 by 12.5. Baylor: 5 by 30.8. Kansas State: 6 by 35. Texas State: 4 by 36.7. UTEP: 8 by 38.3. Rice: 8 by 53.3. Louisiana Tech: 8 by 33.3. Southern Miss: 12 by 75. UAB: 9 by 37.5. Florida International: 12 by 55. Marshall: 8 by 43.3. North Texas: 3 by 12.5
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
12 games
Featured metric
Havoc Plays
Top game by takeover score
Southern Miss
Best efficiency game
75 vs Southern Miss
| Result | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sun 11/25 | vs North Texas | L 21-24 | 3 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/17 | @ Marshall | L 0-23 | 8 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sun 11/11 | vs Florida International10+ tackles | L 7-45 | 12 | 1 | — | 0.50 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/3 | @ UAB | L 3-52 | 9 | 7 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/20 | @ Southern Miss10+ tackles · Splash game | L 17-27 | 12 | 8 | — | 1.50 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/13 | vs Louisiana Tech | L 3-31 | 8 | 5 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/6 | @ RiceSplash game | W 20-3 | 8 | 6 | — | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/29 | vs UTEP | W 30-21 | 8 | 6 | — | 0.50 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/22 | vs Texas StateSplash game | W 25-21 | 4 | 4 | — | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/15 | @ Kansas State | L 17-41 | 6 | 5 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/8 | vs Baylor | L 20-37 | 5 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sun 9/2 | @ Arizona State | L 7-49 | 3 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
UTSA
2015-2018
Opening stop
Season Value Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2015 Regular Season | UTSA | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2016 Regular Season | UTSA | 0 | — | — | 0 |
| 2017 Regular Season | UTSA | 4 | 18 | 5.3 | 4 |
| 2018 Regular Season | UTSA | 10.5 | 38.6 | 8.9 | 6.5 |
#1 Featured game
Southern Miss
Loss with 2.5 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2.5
Primary metric
2.5 disruption/tackle impact with 66.5 takeover score.
#2
Southern
3
Primary metric
Win with 3 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
3 disruption/tackle impact with 56.1 takeover score.
#3
Rice
2
Primary metric
Win with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 49 takeover score.
#4
Texas State
2
Primary metric
Win with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 42.4 takeover score.
#5
Marshall
1
Primary metric
Loss with 1 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
1 disruption/tackle impact with 30.9 takeover score.
#1 Season by Season Value
2018 Regular Season · UTSA
10.5 primary output · 38.6 efficiency · 8.9 usage
48.5
#2
2017 Regular Season · UTSA
18.7
4 primary · 18 efficiency · 5.3 usage
#3
2015 Regular Season · UTSA
—
0 primary · — efficiency · — usage
1
Impact games
4
Splash games
2
10+ tackle games
Career Facts
1
Career teams
4
Seasons tracked
98
Career Tackles
Data Context
Coverage spans 4 tracked seasons, 17 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Next best actions
Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.