Usage Score
6.7
Player Dossier
2016-2017UTEP
LB • 5'11" • 230 lbs • Port Arthur, TX, USA
Dante Lovilotte shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 29 disruption score.
Usage Score
6.7
Efficiency
29
Consistency
11.1
Season Value
23.3
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by Season Value: 2016 Regular Season · UTEP
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Dante Lovilotte, LB. Best season Best season by Season Value: 2016 Regular Season · UTEP. Dante Lovilotte shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 29 disruption score.
Dante Lovilotte played LB for UTEP. Across 2 tracked seasons, Dante Lovilotte recorded 156 tackles. His top tracked season came in 2016 with UTEP.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2016 Regular Season
UTEP paired 14 primary output with 42.2 efficiency.
Supporting note
2017 Regular Season role shape
impact-led usage with 29 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value cooled off
2017 Regular Season fell back from the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: New Mexico State
Loss with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
12
Havoc Plays / G
0.5
Efficiency
29
Usage
6.7
Consistency
11.1
Best Game by takeover score
New Mexico State
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Oklahoma: 2. Rice: 0. Arizona: 0. New Mexico State: 2. Army: 0. Western Kentucky: 0. Southern Miss: 0. UTSA: 0.5. Middle Tennessee: 0. North Texas: 2. Louisiana Tech: 0. UAB: 0
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Oklahoma: 3 by 32.5. Rice: 11 by 45.8. Arizona: 7 by 29.2. New Mexico State: 8 by 53.3. Army: 4 by 16.7. Western Kentucky: 1 by 4.2. Southern Miss: 6 by 25. UTSA: 2 by 13.3. Middle Tennessee: 7 by 29.2. North Texas: 6 by 45. Louisiana Tech: 8 by 33.3. UAB: 5 by 20.8
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
12 games
Featured metric
Havoc Plays
Top game by takeover score
New Mexico State
Best efficiency game
53.3 vs New Mexico State
| Result | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 11/25 | @ UAB | L 7-28 | 5 | 3 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/18 | vs Louisiana Tech | L 21-42 | 8 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/11 | @ North TexasSplash game | L 10-45 | 6 | 3 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 11/4 | @ Middle Tennessee | L 3-30 | 7 | 6 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sun 10/29 | vs UTSA | L 14-31 | 2 | 0 | — | 0.50 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/14 | @ Southern Miss | L 0-24 | 6 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sun 10/8 | vs Western Kentucky | L 14-15 | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/30 | @ Army | L 21-35 | 4 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sun 9/24 | @ New Mexico StateSplash game | L 14-41 | 8 | 3 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 9/16 | vs Arizona | L 16-63 | 7 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sun 9/10 | vs Rice10+ tackles | L 14-31 | 11 | 4 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/2 | @ OklahomaSplash game | L 7-56 | 3 | 3 | — | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
UTEP
2016-2017
Opening stop
Season Value Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2016 Regular Season | UTEP | 14 | 42.2 | 10.9 | — |
| 2017 Regular Season | UTEP | 6.5 | 29 | 6.7 | -7.5 |
#1 Featured game
New Mexico State
Win with 3.5 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
3.5
Primary metric
3.5 disruption/tackle impact with 57.6 takeover score.
#2
New Mexico State
2
Primary metric
Loss with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 56.7 takeover score.
#3
North Texas
2
Primary metric
Loss with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 51.8 takeover score.
#4
Oklahoma
2
Primary metric
Loss with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 49.5 takeover score.
#5
UTSA
2.5
Primary metric
Win with 2.5 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2.5 disruption/tackle impact with 45.3 takeover score.
#1 Season by Season Value
2016 Regular Season · UTEP
14 primary output · 42.2 efficiency · 10.9 usage
52
#2
2017 Regular Season · UTEP
23.3
6.5 primary · 29 efficiency · 6.7 usage
0
Impact games
6
Splash games
4
10+ tackle games
Career Facts
1
Career teams
2
Seasons tracked
156
Career Tackles
Data Context
Coverage spans 2 tracked seasons, 24 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Next best actions
Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.