Player Stats

Alohi Gilman College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Tackles
236
TFL
11
Sacks
1
QB hurries
3
Passes defended
12

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesTacklesTFLSacksQB HurPDTDOverall
2014 Regular SeasonNavy00-0--0-
2015 Regular SeasonNavy00-0--0-
2016 PostseasonNavy146-0--054.3
2016 Regular SeasonNavy147050-5054.3
2018 PostseasonNotre Dame1318-0-2050.3
2018 Regular SeasonNotre Dame13683023050.3
2019 PostseasonNotre Dame138-0--039.7
2019 Regular SeasonNotre Dame13663112039.7

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2016 Postseason

Navy paired 10 primary output with 29.8 efficiency.

Supporting note

2019 Postseason role shape

impact-led usage with 29.9 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value stayed steady

2019 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Multi-stop career journey

Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across Navy, Notre Dame.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: Boston College

Win with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2019 Postseason · Notre Dame

Games

13

Havoc Plays / G

0.6

Efficiency

29.9

Usage

5.6

Consistency

15.4

Best Game by takeover score

Boston College

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

12345678910111213

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Iowa State: 0. Louisville: 0.5. New Mexico: 2. Georgia: 0. Virginia: 2. Bowling Green: 0. USC: 0. Michigan: 0.5. Virginia Tech: 0. Duke: 0. Navy: 0. Boston College: 2. Stanford: 1

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Iowa State: 8 by 33.3. Louisville: 10 by 46.7. New Mexico: 3 by 32.5. Georgia: 8 by 33.3. Virginia: 3 by 32.5. Bowling Green: 5 by 20.8. USC: 9 by 37.5. Michigan: 5 by 25.8. Virginia Tech: 3 by 12.5. Duke: 6 by 25. Navy: 4 by 16.7. Boston College: 7 by 49.2. Stanford: 3 by 22.5

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins0.7 · Games = 11 · +0.4 vs Losses
Losses0.3 · Games = 2 · -0.4 vs Wins