Player Dossier

2014-2019

Notre Dame

Alohi Gilman

S • 5'10" • 202 lbs • Laie, HI, USA

Ball-hunting defenderSplash play profile

Alohi Gilman shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 29.9 disruption score.

Usage Score

5.6

Efficiency

29.9

Consistency

15.4

Season Value

29.4

Career Arc

Value trend by season

Best season by Season Value: 2016 Postseason · Navy

1415161618181919

Snapshot

Career Teams
2
Seasons Tracked
8
Program Path
Navy • Notre Dame
Peak Game
Peak game by takeover score: Florida State

Scouting Read

Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.

Alohi Gilman, S. Best season Best season by Season Value: 2016 Postseason · Navy. Alohi Gilman shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 29.9 disruption score.

Alohi Gilman played S for Navy and Notre Dame. Across 5 tracked seasons, Alohi Gilman recorded 236 tackles. His top tracked season came in 2016 with Navy.

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2016 Postseason

Navy paired 10 primary output with 29.8 efficiency.

Supporting note

2019 Postseason role shape

impact-led usage with 29.9 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value stayed steady

2019 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Multi-stop career journey

Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across Navy, Notre Dame.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: Boston College

Win with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2019 Postseason · Notre Dame

Games

13

Havoc Plays / G

0.6

Efficiency

29.9

Usage

5.6

Consistency

15.4

Best Game by takeover score

Boston College

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

12345678910111213

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Iowa State: 0. Louisville: 0.5. New Mexico: 2. Georgia: 0. Virginia: 2. Bowling Green: 0. USC: 0. Michigan: 0.5. Virginia Tech: 0. Duke: 0. Navy: 0. Boston College: 2. Stanford: 1

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Iowa State: 8 by 33.3. Louisville: 10 by 46.7. New Mexico: 3 by 32.5. Georgia: 8 by 33.3. Virginia: 3 by 32.5. Bowling Green: 5 by 20.8. USC: 9 by 37.5. Michigan: 5 by 25.8. Virginia Tech: 3 by 12.5. Duke: 6 by 25. Navy: 4 by 16.7. Boston College: 7 by 49.2. Stanford: 3 by 22.5

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins0.7 · Games = 11 · +0.4 vs Losses
Losses0.3 · Games = 2 · -0.4 vs Wins

Game Log

Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.

13 games

Featured metric

Havoc Plays

Top game by takeover score

Boston College

Best efficiency game

49.2 vs Boston College

Result
Sat 12/28@ Iowa StateW 33-982000
Sat 11/30@ StanfordW 45-2431001
Sat 11/23vs Boston CollegeSplash gameW 40-775110
Sat 11/16vs NavyW 52-2043000
Sun 11/10@ DukeW 38-763000
Sat 11/2vs Virginia TechW 21-2030000
Sat 10/26@ MichiganL 14-45510.5000
Sat 10/12vs USCW 30-2792000
Sat 10/5vs Bowling GreenW 52-053000
Sat 9/28vs VirginiaSplash gameW 35-20321010
Sun 9/22@ GeorgiaL 17-2383000
Sat 9/14vs New MexicoSplash gameW 66-1431001
Tue 9/3@ Louisville10+ tacklesW 35-171060.5000

Career Arc

Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.

  1. 1

    Navy

    2014-2016

    Opening stop

  2. 2

    Notre Dame

    2018-2019

    Final stop

Season Value Progression

20142015201620162018201820192019
SeasonTeamPrimaryEfficiencyUsageDelta
2014 Regular SeasonNavy0
2015 Regular SeasonNavy00
2016 PostseasonNavy1029.87.710
2016 Regular SeasonNavy1029.87.70
2018 PostseasonNotre Dame1236.46.22
2018 Regular SeasonNotre Dame1236.46.20
2019 PostseasonNotre Dame829.95.6-4
2019 Regular SeasonNotre Dame829.95.60

Signature Performances

Top Games

#1 Featured game

Florida State

Win with 4 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.

4

Primary metric

4 disruption/tackle impact with 66.3 takeover score.

#2

South Florida

2

Primary metric

Loss with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.

2 disruption/tackle impact with 59.2 takeover score.

#3

Boston College

2

Primary metric

Win with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.

2 disruption/tackle impact with 53.3 takeover score.

#4

Michigan

3

Primary metric

Win with 3 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.

3 disruption/tackle impact with 47.7 takeover score.

#5

Houston

2

Primary metric

Win with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.

2 disruption/tackle impact with 46.5 takeover score.

Top Seasons

#1 Season by Season Value

2016 Postseason · Navy

10 primary output · 29.8 efficiency · 7.7 usage

40.2

#2

2016 Regular Season · Navy

40.2

10 primary · 29.8 efficiency · 7.7 usage

#3

2018 Postseason · Notre Dame

38.9

12 primary · 36.4 efficiency · 6.2 usage

Milestones

1

Impact games

10

Splash games

6

10+ tackle games

Bio, Recruit, and Data Context

Recruit context is not available for this player in the current dataset.

Career Facts

2

Career teams

8

Seasons tracked

236

Career Tackles

Data Context

Coverage spans 8 tracked seasons, 40 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.