Usage Score
18.1
Player Dossier
2016-2017Eastern Michigan
Antoine Porter
WR • 5'8" • 180 lbs • San Francisco, CA, USA
Vertical playmakerExplosive finisher
Antoine Porter reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
73.7
Consistency
71
Season Value
65.7
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by Season Value: 2017 Regular Season · Eastern Michigan
1617
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 2
- Program Path
- Eastern Michigan
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Western Michigan
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Antoine Porter, WR. Best season Best season by Season Value: 2017 Regular Season · Eastern Michigan. Antoine Porter reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Antoine Porter played WR for Eastern Michigan. Across 2 tracked seasons, Antoine Porter recorded -16 rushing yards, 1,039 receiving yards, and 2 tackles. His top tracked season came in 2017 with Eastern Michigan.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2017 Regular Season
Eastern Michigan paired 548 primary output with 73.7 efficiency.
Supporting note
2017 Regular Season role shape
target-driven usage with 73.7 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value is trending up
2017 Regular Season improved on the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Western Michigan
Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2017 Regular Season · Eastern Michigan
Games
12
Receiving Yards / G
45.7
Efficiency
73.7
Usage
18.1
Consistency
71
Best Game by takeover score
Western Michigan
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Game-by-Game Trend
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Charlotte: 74. Rutgers: 62. Ohio: 41. Kentucky: 58. Toledo: 23. Army: 45. Western Michigan: 93. Northern Illinois: 39. Ball State: 24. Central Michigan: 18. Miami (OH): 47. Bowling Green: 24
Volume vs Efficiency
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Charlotte: 3 by 100. Rutgers: 7 by 59. Ohio: 4 by 68.3. Kentucky: 5 by 77.3. Toledo: 3 by 51.1. Army: 1 by 100. Western Michigan: 10 by 62. Northern Illinois: 2 by 100. Ball State: 3 by 53.3. Central Michigan: 2 by 60. Miami (OH): 3 by 100. Bowling Green: 3 by 53.3
Split Comparison
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Wins46.2 · Games = 5 · +0.9 vs Losses
Losses45.3 · Games = 7 · -0.9 vs Wins
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
12 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Western Michigan
Best efficiency game
100 vs Miami (OH)
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wed 11/22 | vs Bowling Green | W 34-31 | — | 3 | 24 | 8 | 8 | 0 | 11 |
| Thu 11/16 | @ Miami (OH) | W 27-24 | — | 3 | 47 | 15.7 | 15.70 | 0 | 24 |
| Thu 11/9 | @ Central Michigan | L 30-42 | — | 2 | 18 | 9 | 9 | 0 | 21 |
| Thu 11/2 | vs Ball State | W 56-14 | — | 3 | 24 | 8 | 8 | 1 | 11 |
| Thu 10/26 | @ Northern Illinois | L 27-30 | — | 2 | 39 | 19.5 | 19.50 | 0 | 27 |
| Sat 10/21 | vs Western MichiganHigh volume | L 17-20 | — | 10 | 93 | 7 | 9.30 | 0 | 32 |
| Sat 10/14 | @ Army | L 27-28 | — | 1 | 45 | 45 | 45 | 1 | 45 |
| Sat 10/7 | @ Toledo | L 15-20 | — | 3 | 23 | 7.7 | 7.70 | 1 | 12 |
| Sat 9/30 | @ Kentucky | L 20-24 | — | 5 | 58 | 11.6 | 11.60 | 0 | 21 |
| Sat 9/23 | vs Ohio | L 20-27 | — | 4 | 41 | 10.3 | 10.30 | 0 | 25 |
| Sat 9/9 | @ Rutgers | W 16-13 | — | 7 | 62 | 8.9 | 8.90 | 1 | 14 |
| Fri 9/1 | vs Charlotte | W 24-7 | — | 3 | 74 | 24.7 | 24.70 | 0 | 41 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Eastern Michigan
2016-2017
Opening stop
Season Value Progression
20162017
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2016 Regular Season | Eastern Michigan | 491 | 71.7 | 16.9 | — |
| 2017 Regular Season | Eastern Michigan | 548 | 73.7 | 18.1 | 57 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Western Michigan
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
80
Primary metric
80 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Bowling Green
64
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
64 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Western Michigan
93
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
93 receiving yards with a 62 efficiency score.
#4
Charlotte
74
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
74 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
Ohio
74
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
74 receiving yards with a 70.5 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by Season Value
2017 Regular Season · Eastern Michigan
548 primary output · 73.7 efficiency · 18.1 usage
65.7
#2
2016 Regular Season · Eastern Michigan
60.7
491 primary · 71.7 efficiency · 16.9 usage
Milestones
0
100+ receiving yards
1
8+ catch outings
0
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Career Facts
1
Career teams
2
Seasons tracked
1,039
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 2 tracked seasons, 23 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Next best actions
Keep exploring Antoine Porter
Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.