Usage Score
9.3
Player Dossier
2016-2019Oregon
LB • 6'4" • 226 lbs • Norco, CA, USA
Troy Dye shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 42.6 disruption score.
Usage Score
9.3
Efficiency
42.6
Consistency
60.6
Season Value
51
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by Season Value: 2016 Regular Season · Oregon
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Troy Dye, LB. Best season Best season by Season Value: 2016 Regular Season · Oregon. Troy Dye shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 42.6 disruption score.
Troy Dye played LB for Oregon. Across 4 tracked seasons, Troy Dye recorded 383 tackles. His top tracked season came in 2017 with Oregon.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2016 Regular Season
Oregon paired 23.5 primary output with 59.7 efficiency.
Supporting note
2019 Postseason role shape
impact-led usage with 42.6 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2019 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Utah
Win with 3.5 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 92.3th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
13
Havoc Plays / G
1.7
Efficiency
42.6
Usage
9.3
Consistency
60.6
Best Game by takeover score
Utah
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Wisconsin: 0. Auburn: 0. Nevada: 4. Montana: 2. Stanford: 3. California: 2. Colorado: 0.5. Washington: 1. USC: 2. Arizona: 2. Arizona State: 1. Oregon State: 1. Utah: 3.5
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Wisconsin: 9 by 37.5. Auburn: 15 by 50. Nevada: 4 by 56.7. Montana: 2 by 28.3. Stanford: 4 by 46.7. California: 4 by 36.7. Colorado: 4 by 21.7. Washington: 5 by 30.8. USC: 4 by 36.7. Arizona: 8 by 53.3. Arizona State: 13 by 60. Oregon State: 4 by 26.7. Utah: 8 by 68.3
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
13 games
Featured metric
Havoc Plays
Top game by takeover score
Utah
Best efficiency game
68.3 vs Utah
| Result | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wed 1/1 | @ Wisconsin | W 28-27 | 9 | 6 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 12/7 | vs UtahSplash game | W 37-15 | 8 | 3 | — | 1 | 0.50 | 1 | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/30 | vs Oregon State | W 24-10 | 4 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sun 11/24 | @ Arizona State10+ tackles | L 28-31 | 13 | 10 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sun 11/17 | vs ArizonaSplash game | W 34-6 | 8 | 6 | — | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sun 11/3 | @ USCSplash game | W 56-24 | 4 | 3 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 10/19 | @ Washington | W 35-31 | 5 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 10/12 | vs Colorado | W 45-3 | 4 | 1 | — | 0.50 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sun 10/6 | vs CaliforniaSplash game | W 17-7 | 4 | 1 | — | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/21 | @ StanfordSplash game | W 21-6 | 4 | 3 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sun 9/15 | vs MontanaSplash game | W 35-3 | 2 | 2 | — | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/7 | vs NevadaSplash game | W 77-6 | 4 | 4 | — | 2 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 8/31 | @ Auburn10+ tackles | L 21-27 | 15 | 10 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Oregon
2016-2019
Opening stop
Season Value Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2016 Regular Season | Oregon | 23.5 | 59.7 | 17.3 | — |
| 2017 Postseason | Oregon | 24 | 52.8 | 13 | 0.5 |
| 2017 Regular Season | Oregon | 24 | 52.8 | 13 | 0 |
| 2018 Postseason | Oregon | 16 | 52.4 | 11.9 | -8 |
| 2018 Regular Season | Oregon | 16 | 52.4 | 11.9 | 0 |
| 2019 Postseason | Oregon | 22 | 42.6 | 9.3 | 6 |
| 2019 Regular Season | Oregon | 22 | 42.6 | 9.3 | 0 |
#1 Featured game
UC Davis
Win with 5.5 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
5.5
Primary metric
5.5 disruption/tackle impact with 75.3 takeover score.
#2
Southern Utah
5
Primary metric
Win with 5 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
5 disruption/tackle impact with 71.5 takeover score.
#3
Arizona State
4
Primary metric
Win with 4 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
4 disruption/tackle impact with 58.8 takeover score.
#4
Bowling Green
3
Primary metric
Win with 3 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
3 disruption/tackle impact with 58.2 takeover score.
#5
California
2.5
Primary metric
Win with 2.5 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2.5 disruption/tackle impact with 57.9 takeover score.
#1 Season by Season Value
2016 Regular Season · Oregon
23.5 primary output · 59.7 efficiency · 17.3 usage
60.4
#2
2017 Postseason · Oregon
56.4
24 primary · 52.8 efficiency · 13 usage
#3
2017 Regular Season · Oregon
56.4
24 primary · 52.8 efficiency · 13 usage
2
Impact games
26
Splash games
19
10+ tackle games
Career Facts
1
Career teams
7
Seasons tracked
383
Career Tackles
Data Context
Coverage spans 7 tracked seasons, 47 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Next best actions
Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.