Usage Score
8.3
Player Dossier
2016-2019Army
Kell Walker
RB • 5'9" • 195 lbs • Decatur, GA, USA
Balanced backfield optionSteady chain mover
Kell Walker leans balanced backfield option traits and 58.7 efficiency.
Efficiency
58.7
Consistency
64.3
Season Value
47.7
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by Season Value: 2017 Postseason · Army
161617171819
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 6
- Program Path
- Army
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Rice
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Kell Walker, RB. Best season Best season by Season Value: 2017 Postseason · Army. Kell Walker leans balanced backfield option traits and 58.7 efficiency.
Kell Walker played RB for Army. Across 4 tracked seasons, Kell Walker recorded 1,719 rushing yards, 352 receiving yards, and 4 tackles. His top tracked season came in 2017 with Army.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2017 Postseason
Army paired 740 primary output with 72.8 efficiency.
Supporting note
2019 Regular Season role shape
backfield-heavy usage with 58.7 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2019 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: UTSA
Win with 80 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2019 Regular Season · Army
Games
12
Scrimmage Yards / G
36.6
Efficiency
58.7
Usage
8.3
Consistency
64.3
Best Game by takeover score
UTSA
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Game-by-Game Trend
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Rice: 42. Michigan: 39. UTSA: 80. Morgan State: 17. Tulane: 8. Western Kentucky: 13. Georgia State: 10. San José State: 54. Massachusetts: 60. VMI: 68. Hawai'i: 37. Navy: 11
Volume vs Efficiency
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Rice: 5 by 74.1. Michigan: 5 by 81.3. UTSA: 5 by 100. Morgan State: 5 by 35.4. Tulane: 4 by 8.3. Western Kentucky: 4 by 33.9. Georgia State: 3 by 34.7. San José State: 7 by 80.4. Massachusetts: 7 by 85.7. VMI: 4 by 100. Hawai'i: 8 by 48.2. Navy: 5 by 22.9
Split Comparison
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Wins53.4 · Games = 5 · +28.8 vs Losses
Losses24.6 · Games = 7 · -28.8 vs Wins
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
12 games
Featured metric
Scrimmage Yards
Top game by takeover score
UTSA
Best efficiency game
100 vs VMI
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 12/14 | @ Navy | L 7-31 | 5 | 11 | 2.20 | 0 | — | — | 2.2 |
| Sun 12/1 | @ Hawai'i | L 31-52 | 8 | 37 | 4.60 | 0 | — | — | 4.6 |
| Sat 11/16 | vs VMI | W 47-6 | 3 | 67 | 22.30 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 17 |
| Sat 11/9 | vs Massachusetts | W 63-7 | 7 | 60 | 8.60 | 0 | — | — | 8.6 |
| Sat 10/26 | vs San José State | L 29-34 | 7 | 54 | 7.70 | 0 | — | — | 7.7 |
| Sat 10/19 | @ Georgia State | L 21-28 | 3 | 10 | 3.30 | 0 | — | — | 3.3 |
| Sat 10/12 | @ Western Kentucky | L 8-17 | 4 | 13 | 3.30 | 0 | — | — | 3.3 |
| Sat 10/5 | vs Tulane | L 33-42 | 2 | -15 | -7.50 | 0 | 2 | 23 | 2 |
| Sat 9/21 | vs Morgan State | W 52-21 | 5 | 17 | 3.40 | 0 | — | — | 3.4 |
| Sat 9/14 | @ UTSA2+ TD | W 31-13 | 5 | 80 | 16 | 2 | — | — | 16 |
| Sat 9/7 | @ Michigan | L 21-24 | 5 | 39 | 7.80 | 0 | — | — | 7.8 |
| Fri 8/30 | vs Rice | W 14-7 | 4 | 25 | 6.30 | 0 | 1 | 17 | 8.4 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Army
2016-2019
Opening stop
Season Value Progression
201620162017201720182019
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2016 Postseason | Army | 402 | 66.3 | 7.8 | — |
| 2016 Regular Season | Army | 402 | 66.3 | 7.8 | 0 |
| 2017 Postseason | Army | 740 | 72.8 | 12.3 | 338 |
| 2017 Regular Season | Army | 740 | 72.8 | 12.3 | 0 |
| 2018 Regular Season | Army | 490 | 49.6 | 11.5 | -250 |
| 2019 Regular Season | Army | 439 | 58.7 | 8.3 | -51 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Rice
Win with 127 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
127
Primary metric
127 scrimmage yards and 15.2 usage.
#2
UTSA
80
Primary metric
Win with 80 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
80 scrimmage yards and 8.8 usage.
#3
Eastern Michigan
115
Primary metric
Win with 115 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
115 scrimmage yards and 23 usage.
#4
Oklahoma
120
Primary metric
Loss with 120 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
120 scrimmage yards and 18.3 usage.
#5
VMI
68
Primary metric
Win with 68 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
68 scrimmage yards and 5.8 usage.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by Season Value
2017 Postseason · Army
740 primary output · 72.8 efficiency · 12.3 usage
61.5
#2
2017 Regular Season · Army
61.5
740 primary · 72.8 efficiency · 12.3 usage
#3
2018 Regular Season · Army
48.4
490 primary · 49.6 efficiency · 11.5 usage
Milestones
2
100+ rush yards
0
150+ scrimmage yards
3
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Career Facts
1
Career teams
6
Seasons tracked
2,071
Career Scrimmage Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 6 tracked seasons, 45 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Next best actions
Keep exploring Kell Walker
Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.