Usage Score
5.6
Player Dossier
2016-2017Utah State
WR • 6'2" • 185 lbs • Riverview, FL, USA
Alex Byers reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Usage Score
5.6
Efficiency
51.1
Consistency
62.6
Season Value
45.1
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by Season Value: 2016 Regular Season · Utah State
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Alex Byers, WR. Best season Best season by Season Value: 2016 Regular Season · Utah State. Alex Byers reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Alex Byers played WR for Utah State. Across 2 tracked seasons, Alex Byers recorded 10 rushing yards and 79 receiving yards. His top tracked season came in 2016 with Utah State.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2016 Regular Season
Utah State paired 49 primary output with 70 efficiency.
Supporting note
2017 Regular Season role shape
target-driven usage with 51.1 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2017 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: UNLV
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
3
Receiving Yards / G
10
Efficiency
51.1
Usage
5.6
Consistency
62.6
Best Game by takeover score
UNLV
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Wisconsin: 8. Idaho State: 4. UNLV: 18
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Wisconsin: 2 by 26.7. Idaho State: 1 by 26.7. UNLV: 1 by 100
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
3 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
UNLV
Best efficiency game
100 vs UNLV
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Utah State
2016-2017
Opening stop
Season Value Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2016 Regular Season | Utah State | 49 | 70 | 6.6 | — |
| 2017 Regular Season | Utah State | 30 | 51.1 | 5.6 | -19 |
#1 Featured game
San Diego State
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
43
Primary metric
43 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
UNLV
18
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
18 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Wisconsin
8
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
8 receiving yards with a 26.7 efficiency score.
#4
USC
6
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
6 receiving yards with a 40 efficiency score.
#5
Idaho State
4
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
4 receiving yards with a 26.7 efficiency score.
#1 Season by Season Value
2016 Regular Season · Utah State
49 primary output · 70 efficiency · 6.6 usage
50
#2
2017 Regular Season · Utah State
45.1
30 primary · 51.1 efficiency · 5.6 usage
0
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
0
2+ TD games
Career Facts
1
Career teams
2
Seasons tracked
79
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 2 tracked seasons, 6 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Next best actions
Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.