Usage Score
15.2
Player Dossier
2016-2019Louisville
Seth Dawkins
WR • 6'3" • 218 lbs • Columbus, OH, USA
Vertical playmakerExplosive finisher
Seth Dawkins reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
83.8
Consistency
29.2
Season Value
45.6
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by Season Value: 2017 Postseason · Louisville
161617171819
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 6
- Program Path
- Louisville
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Boston College
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Seth Dawkins, WR. Best season Best season by Season Value: 2017 Postseason · Louisville. Seth Dawkins reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Seth Dawkins played WR for Louisville. Across 4 tracked seasons, Seth Dawkins recorded 4 rushing yards, 1,510 receiving yards, and 3 tackles. His top tracked season came in 2017 with Louisville.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2017 Postseason
Louisville paired 642 primary output with 87.5 efficiency.
Supporting note
2019 Regular Season role shape
target-driven usage with 83.8 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2019 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Boston College
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2019 Regular Season · Louisville
Games
9
Receiving Yards / G
38.7
Efficiency
83.8
Usage
15.2
Consistency
29.2
Best Game by takeover score
Boston College
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Game-by-Game Trend
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Notre Dame: 18. Eastern Kentucky: 0. Western Kentucky: 21. Boston College: 170. Wake Forest: 68. Clemson: 6. Virginia: 0. Miami: 36. Syracuse: 29
Volume vs Efficiency
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Notre Dame: 1 by 100. Western Kentucky: 3 by 46.7. Boston College: 6 by 100. Wake Forest: 3 by 100. Clemson: 1 by 40. Miami: 1 by 100. Syracuse: 1 by 100
Split Comparison
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Wins48 · Games = 6 · +28 vs Losses
Losses20 · Games = 3 · -28 vs Wins
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
9 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Boston College
Best efficiency game
100 vs Syracuse
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 11/23 | vs Syracuse | W 56-34 | — | 1 | 29 | 29 | 29 | 1 | 29 |
| Sat 11/9 | @ Miami | L 27-52 | — | 1 | 36 | 36 | 36 | 0 | 36 |
| Sat 10/26 | vs Virginia | W 28-21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sat 10/19 | vs Clemson | L 10-45 | — | 1 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 0 | 6 |
| Sat 10/12 | @ Wake Forest | W 62-59 | — | 3 | 68 | 22.7 | 22.70 | 1 | 55 |
| Sat 10/5 | vs Boston College100 receiving yards | W 41-39 | — | 6 | 170 | 28.3 | 28.30 | 1 | 77 |
| Sat 9/14 | @ Western Kentucky | W 38-21 | — | 3 | 21 | 7 | 7 | 0 | 10 |
| Sat 9/7 | vs Eastern Kentucky | W 42-0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Tue 9/3 | vs Notre Dame | L 17-35 | — | 1 | 18 | 18 | 18 | 0 | 18 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Louisville
2016-2019
Opening stop
Season Value Progression
201620162017201720182019
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2016 Postseason | Louisville | 191 | 87.5 | 8.4 | — |
| 2016 Regular Season | Louisville | 191 | 87.5 | 8.4 | 0 |
| 2017 Postseason | Louisville | 642 | 87.5 | 16.9 | 451 |
| 2017 Regular Season | Louisville | 642 | 87.5 | 16.9 | 0 |
| 2018 Regular Season | Louisville | 329 | 75.7 | 14.1 | -313 |
| 2019 Regular Season | Louisville | 348 | 83.8 | 15.2 | 19 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Boston College
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
170
Primary metric
170 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
NC State
133
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
133 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Alabama
68
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
68 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
Houston
49
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
49 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
Duke
53
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
53 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by Season Value
2017 Postseason · Louisville
642 primary output · 87.5 efficiency · 16.9 usage
67.7
#2
2017 Regular Season · Louisville
67.7
642 primary · 87.5 efficiency · 16.9 usage
#3
2018 Regular Season · Louisville
49.4
329 primary · 75.7 efficiency · 14.1 usage
Milestones
2
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
0
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Career Facts
1
Career teams
6
Seasons tracked
1,510
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 6 tracked seasons, 42 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Next best actions
Keep exploring Seth Dawkins
Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.