Usage Score
16.5
Player Dossier
2016-2019Utah
DE • 6'3" • 265 lbs • Laie, HI, USA
Bradlee Anae shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 35.1 disruption score.
Usage Score
16.5
Efficiency
35.1
Consistency
48.7
Season Value
50.1
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by Season Value: 2019 Postseason · Utah
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Bradlee Anae, DE. Best season Best season by Season Value: 2019 Postseason · Utah. Bradlee Anae shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 35.1 disruption score.
Bradlee Anae played DE for Utah. Across 4 tracked seasons, Bradlee Anae recorded 14 rushing yards and 132 tackles. His top tracked season came in 2018 with Utah.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2019 Postseason
Utah paired 28 primary output with 35.1 efficiency.
Supporting note
2019 Postseason role shape
impact-led usage with 35.1 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2019 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Arizona State
Win with backfield disruption leading the way. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
12
Havoc Plays / G
2.3
Efficiency
35.1
Usage
16.5
Consistency
48.7
Best Game by takeover score
Arizona State
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Texas: 1. Northern Illinois: 6. Idaho State: 0. USC: 3. Washington State: 0. Oregon State: 0. Arizona State: 7. Washington: 2. UCLA: 4. Arizona: 2. Colorado: 3. Oregon: 0
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Texas: 6 by 35. Northern Illinois: 4 by 66.7. Idaho State: 1 by 4.2. USC: 5 by 50.8. Washington State: 1 by 4.2. Oregon State: 3 by 12.5. Arizona State: 3 by 62.5. Washington: 2 by 28.3. UCLA: 2 by 48.3. Arizona: 7 by 49.2. Colorado: 5 by 50.8. Oregon: 2 by 8.3
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
12 games
Featured metric
Havoc Plays
Top game by takeover score
Arizona State
Best efficiency game
66.7 vs Northern Illinois
| Result | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wed 1/1 | @ Texas | L 10-38 | 6 | 4 | — | 0.50 | 0.50 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 12/7 | @ Oregon | L 15-37 | 2 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sun 12/1 | vs ColoradoSplash game | W 45-15 | 5 | 1 | — | 1.50 | 1.50 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sun 11/24 | @ ArizonaSplash game | W 35-7 | 7 | 7 | — | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sun 11/17 | vs UCLA2+ sacks · Splash game | W 49-3 | 2 | 2 | — | 2 | 2 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/2 | @ WashingtonSplash game | W 33-28 | 2 | 1 | — | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/19 | vs Arizona State2+ sacks · Splash game | W 21-3 | 3 | 3 | — | 3 | 3 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sun 10/13 | @ Oregon State | W 52-7 | 3 | 3 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sun 9/29 | vs Washington State | W 38-13 | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/21 | @ USCSplash game | L 23-30 | 5 | 4 | — | 2 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/14 | vs Idaho State | W 31-0 | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/7 | vs Northern Illinois2+ sacks · Splash game | W 35-17 | 4 | 3 | — | 3 | 3 | — | 0 | — | — |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Utah
2016-2019
Opening stop
Season Value Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2016 Postseason | Utah | 4 | 18.9 | 4.6 | — |
| 2016 Regular Season | Utah | 4 | 18.9 | 4.6 | 0 |
| 2017 Postseason | Utah | 18 | 29.5 | 13.7 | 14 |
| 2017 Regular Season | Utah | 18 | 29.5 | 13.7 | 0 |
| 2018 Postseason | Utah | 26.5 | 36 | 12.1 | 8.5 |
| 2018 Regular Season | Utah | 26.5 | 36 | 12.1 | 0 |
| 2019 Postseason | Utah | 28 | 35.1 | 16.5 | 1.5 |
| 2019 Regular Season | Utah | 28 | 35.1 | 16.5 | 0 |
#1 Featured game
Colorado
Win with backfield disruption leading the way.
5.5
Primary metric
5.5 disruption/tackle impact with 71.6 takeover score.
#2
Arizona State
7
Primary metric
Win with backfield disruption leading the way.
7 disruption/tackle impact with 66.3 takeover score.
#3
Stanford
6
Primary metric
Win with backfield disruption leading the way.
6 disruption/tackle impact with 65.2 takeover score.
#4
Northern Illinois
6
Primary metric
Win with backfield disruption leading the way.
6 disruption/tackle impact with 61.9 takeover score.
#5
Colorado
4
Primary metric
Win with 4 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
4 disruption/tackle impact with 46.7 takeover score.
#1 Season by Season Value
2019 Postseason · Utah
28 primary output · 35.1 efficiency · 16.5 usage
50.1
#2
2019 Regular Season · Utah
50.1
28 primary · 35.1 efficiency · 16.5 usage
#3
2018 Postseason · Utah
49.8
26.5 primary · 36 efficiency · 12.1 usage
4
Impact games
21
Splash games
0
10+ tackle games
Career Facts
1
Career teams
8
Seasons tracked
132
Career Tackles
Data Context
Coverage spans 8 tracked seasons, 39 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Next best actions
Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.