Usage Score
22.2
Player Dossier
2017-2020Northwestern
Aidan Smith
QB • 6'2" • 215 lbs • Fort Wayne, IN, USA
Balanced quarterback profileVolume operator
Aidan Smith is a balanced quarterback profile with variable involvement in the latest tracked season.
Efficiency
47.1
Consistency
64.4
Season Value
58.4
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by Season Value: 2019 Regular Season · Northwestern
17181920
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 4
- Program Path
- Northwestern
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Nebraska
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Aidan Smith, QB. Best season Best season by Season Value: 2019 Regular Season · Northwestern. Aidan Smith is a balanced quarterback profile with variable involvement in the latest tracked season.
Aidan Smith played QB for Northwestern. Across 4 tracked seasons, Aidan Smith recorded 770 passing yards, 211 rushing yards, and 6 tackles. His top tracked season came in 2019 with Northwestern.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2019 Regular Season
Northwestern paired 981 primary output with 47.1 efficiency.
Supporting note
2019 Regular Season role shape
pass-led usage with 47.1 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value cooled off
2020 Regular Season fell back from the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Nebraska
Loss with balanced pass-rush production and strong creator value. It landed in the 88.9th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2019 Regular Season · Northwestern
Games
9
Primary Metric / G
109
Efficiency
47.1
Usage
22.2
Consistency
64.4
Best Game by takeover score
Nebraska
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Game-by-Game Trend
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Stanford: 0. Michigan State: 35. Wisconsin: 110. Nebraska: 200. Ohio State: 75. Iowa: 133. Indiana: 81. Purdue: 224. Massachusetts: 123
Volume vs Efficiency
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Michigan State: 17 by 23.1. Wisconsin: 27 by 44.2. Nebraska: 48 by 55.6. Ohio State: 31 by 39.4. Iowa: 43 by 44.9. Indiana: 18 by 57.7. Purdue: 38 by 59.5. Massachusetts: 20 by 52
Split Comparison
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Wins123 · Games = 1 · +15.8 vs Losses
Losses107.3 · Games = 8 · -15.8 vs Wins
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
9 games
Featured metric
Total Offense
Top game by takeover score
Nebraska
Best efficiency game
59.5 vs Purdue
| Result | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 11/16 | vs Massachusetts | W 45-6 | 7 | 13 | 76 | 53.8 | 0 | 2 | 52 | 7 | 47 | 6.70 | 0 | 19 |
| Sat 11/9 | vs Purdue | L 22-24 | 18 | 30 | 194 | 60.0 | 2 | 1 | 59.5 | 8 | 30 | 3.80 | 0 | 9 |
| Sat 11/2 | @ Indiana | L 3-34 | 5 | 12 | 47 | 41.7 | 0 | 0 | 57.7 | 6 | 34 | 5.70 | 0 | 22 |
| Sat 10/26 | vs Iowa | L 0-20 | 18 | 32 | 138 | 56.3 | 0 | 1 | 44.9 | 11 | -5 | -0.50 | 0 | 9 |
| Sat 10/19 | vs Ohio State | L 3-52 | 6 | 20 | 42 | 30.0 | 0 | 1 | 39.4 | 11 | 33 | 3 | 0 | 10 |
| Sat 10/5 | @ NebraskaDual-threat | L 10-13 | 19 | 32 | 136 | 59.4 | 0 | 1 | 55.6 | 16 | 64 | 4 | 1 | 11 |
| Sat 9/28 | @ Wisconsin | L 15-24 | 8 | 20 | 99 | 40.0 | 1 | 1 | 44.2 | 7 | 11 | 1.60 | 0 | 9 |
| Sat 9/21 | vs Michigan State | L 10-31 | 4 | 11 | 38 | 36.4 | 0 | 2 | 23.1 | 6 | -3 | -0.50 | 0 | 5 |
| Sat 8/31 | @ Stanford | L 7-17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Northwestern
2017-2020
Opening stop
Season Value Progression
2017201820192020
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2017 Regular Season | Northwestern | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2018 Regular Season | Northwestern | 0 | — | — | 0 |
| 2019 Regular Season | Northwestern | 981 | 47.1 | 22.2 | 981 |
| 2020 Regular Season | Northwestern | 0 | — | — | -981 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Nebraska
Loss with balanced pass-rush production and strong creator value.
200
Primary metric
200 total offense with 55.6 efficiency.
#2
Purdue
224
Primary metric
Loss with 224 yards of offense and 59.5 efficiency.
224 total offense with 59.5 efficiency.
#3
Iowa
133
Primary metric
Loss with 133 yards of offense and 44.9 efficiency.
133 total offense with 44.9 efficiency.
#4
Massachusetts
123
Primary metric
Win shaped by high passing volume and turnover pressure.
123 total offense with 52 efficiency.
#5
Indiana
81
Primary metric
Loss with 81 yards of offense and 57.7 efficiency.
81 total offense with 57.7 efficiency.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by Season Value
2019 Regular Season · Northwestern
981 primary output · 47.1 efficiency · 22.2 usage
58.4
#2
2017 Regular Season · Northwestern
—
0 primary · — efficiency · — usage
#3
2018 Regular Season · Northwestern
—
0 primary · — efficiency · — usage
Milestones
0
250+ passing yards
0
300+ total offense
0
3+ TD games
0
Above avg efficiency
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Career Facts
1
Career teams
4
Seasons tracked
981
Career Total Offense
Data Context
Coverage spans 4 tracked seasons, 9 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Next best actions
Keep exploring Aidan Smith
Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.