Usage Score
25.3
Player Dossier
2016-2019Arkansas
TE • 6'4" • 256 lbs • Fayetteville, AR, USA
Cheyenne O'Grady reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Usage Score
25.3
Efficiency
70.6
Consistency
69.7
Season Value
64.7
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by Season Value: 2018 Regular Season · Arkansas
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Cheyenne O'Grady, TE. Best season Best season by Season Value: 2018 Regular Season · Arkansas. Cheyenne O'Grady reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Cheyenne O'Grady played TE for Arkansas. Across 4 tracked seasons, Cheyenne O'Grady recorded 3 rushing yards, 967 receiving yards, and 4 tackles. His top tracked season came in 2018 with Arkansas.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2018 Regular Season
Arkansas paired 400 primary output with 86.5 efficiency.
Supporting note
2019 Regular Season role shape
target-driven usage with 70.6 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2019 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Texas A&M
Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
7
Receiving Yards / G
53.1
Efficiency
70.6
Usage
25.3
Consistency
69.7
Best Game by takeover score
Texas A&M
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Ole Miss: 45. Colorado State: 74. San José State: 33. Texas A&M: 91. Kentucky: 44. Auburn: 72. Alabama: 13
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Ole Miss: 3 by 100. Colorado State: 3 by 100. San José State: 4 by 55. Texas A&M: 8 by 75.8. Kentucky: 4 by 73.3. Auburn: 7 by 68.6. Alabama: 4 by 21.7
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
7 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Texas A&M
Best efficiency game
100 vs Colorado State
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 10/26 | @ Alabama | L 7-48 | — | 4 | 13 | 3.3 | 3.30 | 1 | 8 |
| Sat 10/19 | vs Auburn | L 10-51 | — | 7 | 72 | 9.4 | 10.30 | 1 | 45 |
| Sat 10/12 | @ Kentucky | L 20-24 | — | 4 | 44 | 11 | 11 | 0 | 22 |
| Sat 9/28 | vs Texas A&MHigh volume | L 27-31 | — | 8 | 91 | 11.4 | 11.40 | 0 | 27 |
| Sat 9/21 | vs San José State | L 24-31 | — | 4 | 33 | 8.3 | 8.30 | 0 | 12 |
| Sat 9/14 | vs Colorado State | W 55-34 | — | 3 | 74 | 24.7 | 24.70 | 1 | 62 |
| Sat 9/7 | @ Ole Miss | L 17-31 | — | 3 | 45 | 15 | 15 | 0 | 25 |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Arkansas
2016-2019
Opening stop
Season Value Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2016 Postseason | Arkansas | 63 | 100 | 8.1 | — |
| 2016 Regular Season | Arkansas | 63 | 100 | 8.1 | 0 |
| 2017 Regular Season | Arkansas | 132 | 44.3 | 13.3 | 69 |
| 2018 Regular Season | Arkansas | 400 | 86.5 | 20.4 | 268 |
| 2019 Regular Season | Arkansas | 372 | 70.6 | 25.3 | -28 |
#1 Featured game
Vanderbilt
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
83
Primary metric
83 receiving yards with a 92.2 efficiency score.
#2
Texas A&M
77
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
77 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Virginia Tech
40
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
40 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
Texas A&M
91
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
91 receiving yards with a 75.8 efficiency score.
#5
LSU
75
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
75 receiving yards with a 83.3 efficiency score.
#1 Season by Season Value
2018 Regular Season · Arkansas
400 primary output · 86.5 efficiency · 20.4 usage
68.7
#2
2019 Regular Season · Arkansas
64.7
372 primary · 70.6 efficiency · 25.3 usage
#3
2016 Postseason · Arkansas
49.5
63 primary · 100 efficiency · 8.1 usage
0
100+ receiving yards
1
8+ catch outings
2
2+ TD games
Recruit Profile
Class 2015 · Rating 0.9204
Fayetteville · Fayetteville, AR
Career Facts
1
Career teams
5
Seasons tracked
967
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 5 tracked seasons, 27 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Next best actions
Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.